Advertisement

Cascaded Plasma–Ozone Injection System: A Novel Approach for Controlling Total Hydrocarbon Emission in Diesel Exhaust

  • Apeksha Madhukar
  • B. S. RajanikanthEmail author
Original Paper
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The hydrocarbons present in diesel exhaust, although treated as minor pollutants, are equivalent to some of the major pollutants in terms of toxicity, contamination and harmfulness to the environment and hence, any effort towards treating hydrocarbons is a welcome step before letting the same into the atmosphere. In this current work two non-thermal plasma techniques viz., electrical discharge plasma (direct plasma) and ozone injection (indirect plasma) were coupled while treating the diesel exhaust for possible mitigation of total hydrocarbons (THC). The work is intended to provide a cleaning system which is non-catalytic, non-adsorbent and non-thermal plasma based one leading to less utilization of electrical energy and long lasting. The study was conducted at laboratory level with controlled flow conditions of the diesel exhaust. It was observed that the combined discharge plasma and ozone injection has resulted in more of THC reduction/conversion to the tune of 95% at about plasma specific energy of 55 J/L and with an injection of 1656 ppm of ozone. The individual as well as cascaded treatment techniques are discussed in detail and a comparative analysis of the same has been provided.

Keywords

Total hydrocarbon Diesel exhaust Ozone injection Non-thermal plasma Electrical discharge Cascaded plasma 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ogata A, Mizuno K, Kushiyama S, Yamamoto T (1998) Methane decomposition in a barium titanate packed-bed nonthermal plasma reactor. Plamsa Chem Plasma Process 18:363–376.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021897419040 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sanjeeva M, Mok YS, Lee SB, Park H (2013) Effect of various parameters for butane decomposition under ambient temperature in a dielectric barrier discharge non-thermal plasma reactor. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 44:786–794.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2013.01.016 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Futamura S, Zhang A, Prieto G, Yamamoto T (1998) Factors and intermediates governing byproduct distribution for decomposition of butane in nonthermal plasma. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 34:967–974.  https://doi.org/10.1109/28.720436 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gandhi MS, Ananth A, Mok YS, Song JI, Park KH (2014) Effect of porosity of α-alumina on non-thermal plasma decomposition of ethylene in a dielectric-packed bed reactor. Res Chem Intermed 40:1483–1493.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-013-1053-z Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ogata A, Ito D, Mizuno K, Kushiyama S, Gal A, Yamamoto T (2002) Effect of coexisting components on aromatic decomposition in a packed-bed plasma reactor. Appl Catal A 236:9–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(02)00280-6 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhu T, Li J, Jin Y, Liang Y, Ma G (2008) Decomposition of benzene by non-thermal plasma processing: photocatalyst and ozone effect. Int J Environ Sci Technol 5:375–384.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326032 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Quoc An HT, Pham Huu T, Le Van T, Cormier JM, Khacef A (2011) Application of atmospheric non-thermal plasma-catalysis hybrid system for air pollution control: Toluene removal. Catal Today 176:474–477.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.10.005 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muhammad FM, Xindi F, Yanjun L, Yawar A, Hongtao W, Wenjing L (2018) Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) removal in non-thermal plasma double dielectric barrier discharge reactor. J Hazard Mater 347:317–324Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ding H-X, Zhu A-M, Yang X-F, Li C-H, Xu Y (2005) Removal of formaldehyde from gas streams via packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge plasmas. J Phys D Appl Phys 38:4160–4167.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/28/23/004 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chae J, Moon S, Sun HS, Young Kim K, Vassiliev VA, Mikhalap EM (1999) A study of volatile organic compounds decomposition with the use of non-thermal plasma. KSME Int J 13:647–655.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03184575 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee HM, Chang MB (2001) Gas-phase removal of acetaldehyde via packed-bed dielectric barrier discharge reactor. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 21:329–343.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011018325026 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu X, Tu X, Mei D, Zheng C, Zhou J, Gao X, Luo Z, Ni M, Cen K (2016) Investigation of hybrid plasma-catalytic removal of acetone over CuO/γ–Al2O3 catalysts using response surface method. Chemosphere 155:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.03.114 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhu X, Gao X, Yu X, Zheng C, Tu X (2015) Catalyst screening for acetone removal in a single-stage plasma-catalysis system. Catal Today 256:108–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.01.028 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Talebizadeh P, Babaie M, Brown R, Rahimzadeh H, Ristovski Z, Arai M (2014) The role of non-thermal plasma technique in NOx treatment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:886–901.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.194 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chae JO (2003) Non-thermal plasma for diesel exhaust treatment. J Electrost 57:251–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3886(02)00165-1 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Madhukar A, Pragati KM, Janardhana M, Rajnaikanth BS (2018) Agricultural rice husk waste for cleaning diesel exhaust pre-treated by non-thermal direct/indirect plasma. In: International symposium on non-thermal plasma, July 1–5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Madhukar A, Rajanikanth BS (2018) Plasma/adsorbent system for NOx treatment in diesel exhaust: a case study on solid industrial wastes. Int J Environ Sci Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1776-x Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anusuya B, Rajanikanth BS (2015) Estimation of power input to complex dielectric barrier discharge reactor geometries used in NOx cleaning. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 22:2907–2914.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2015.005054 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Apeksha M, Rajanikanth BS (2018) Augmenting NOx reduction in diesel exhaust by combined plasma/ozone injection technique: a laboratory investigation. IET Trans High Volt 3:60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1049/hve.2017.0153 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoshio T, Kuwata K (1993) Sensitive flame ionization detector for the determination of traces of atmospheric hydrocarbons by capillary column gas chromatography. J Chromatogr A 642:383–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(93)80102-E Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spanjers CS, Beach CA, Jones AJ, Dauenhauer PJ (2017) Increasing flame ionization detector (FID) sensitivity using post-column oxidation–methanation. R Soc Chem 9:1928–1934.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY03363F Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Partial List of Chemicals Associated with Diesel Exhaust. OSHA united states department of labor https://www.osha.gov/SLTC/dieselexhaust/chemical.html. Accessed 18 Oct 2018
  23. 23.
    Reşitoğlu İA, Keskin K, Altinişik A (2015) The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust aftertreatment systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:15–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0793-9 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zbarcea O, Scarpete D, Vrabie V (2016) Environmental pollution by diesel engines. Part II: a literature review regarding HC, CO, CO2 and soot emissions. Termotehnica. http://www.agir.ro/buletine/2653.pdf. Accessed 24 Oct 2018
  25. 25.
    Conversion factors for hydrocarbon emission components (2004) Report no. NR-002b, U.S. Environmental protection agencyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tsai JH, Chang SY, Chiang HL (2012) Volatile organic compounds from the exhaust of light-duty diesel vehicles. Atmos Environ 61:499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.078 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schmidt M, Jõgi I, Hołub M, Brandenburg R (2015) Non-thermal plasma-based decomposition of volatile organic compounds in industrial exhaust gases. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3745–3754.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-015-0814-1 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gaur M, Singh R, Shukla A (2016) Volatile organic compounds in india: concentration and sources. J Civ Environ Eng 6:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2165-784X.1000251 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cooper DA, Peterson K, Simpson D (1996) Hydrocarbon, PAH and PCB emissions from ferries: a case study in the Skagerak–Kattegatt–Öresund region. Atmos Environ 30:2463–2473.  https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00494-7 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang Bangfen, Xiaoxin Xu, Weicheng Xu, Wang Ni, Xiao Hailin, Sun Yuhai, Huang Haomin, Lian Yu, Mingli Fu, Junliang Wu, Chen Limin, Ye Daiqi (2018) The mechanism of non-thermal plasma catalysis on volatile organic compounds removal. Catal Surv Asia 22:73–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-018-9241-x Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pringle KJ, Whitehead JC, Wilman JJ, Wu J (2004) The chemistry of methane remediation by a non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 24:421–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-004-2277-x Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jiang C, Mohamed AAH, Stark RH (2005) Removal of volatile organic compounds in atmospheric pressure air by means of direct current glow discharges. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 33:1416–1425.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2005.851970 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Atkinson R, Carter WPL (1984) Kinetics and mechanism of gas phase reactions of ozone with organic compounds under atmospheric conditions. ACS Chem Rev 84:437–470.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00063a002 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Skalska K, Miller JS, Ledakowicz S (2010) Trends in NOx abatement: a review. Sci Total Environ 408:3976–3989.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.06.001 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sanchez-Gonzalez R, Kim Y, Rosocha LA, Abbate S (2007) Methane and ethane decomposition in an atmospheric-pressure plasma jet. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 35:1669–1679.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2007.910743 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aerts R, Tu X, Van Gaens W, Whitehead JC, Bogaerts A (2013) Gas purification by nonthermal plasma: a case study of ethylene. Environ Sci Technol 47:6478–6485.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es400405c Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gandhi MS, Ananth A, Mok YS, Song JI, Park KH (2013) Time dependence of ethylene decomposition and byproducts formation in a continuous flow dielectric-packed plasma reactor. Chemosphere 91:685–691.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.060 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hill SL, Kim HH, Futamura S, Whitehead JC (2008) The destruction of atmospheric pressure propane and propene using a surface discharge plasma reactor. J Phys Chem 112:3953–3958.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp800146t Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bufalini JJ, Altshuller AP (1965) Kinetics of vapor-phase hydrocarbon–ozone reactions. Can J Chem 43:2243–2250.  https://doi.org/10.1139/v65-302 Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rousseau A, Gatilova O, Hannemann M, Ropcke J (2007) Measurement of the C2H2 destruction kinetics by infrared laser absorption spectroscopy in a pulsed low pressure dc discharge. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:2018–2025.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/7/025 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cal MP, Schluep M (2004) Destruction of benzene with non-thermal plasma in dielectric barrier discharge reactors. Environ Progress Banner 20:151–156.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670200310 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vandenbroucke AM, Morent R, De Geyter Nathalie, Leys Christophe (2011) Non-thermal plasmas for non-catalytic and catalytic VOC abatement. J Hazard Mater 165:30–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.08.060 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Xiao Z, Di Xu, Hao C, Qiu J, Liu K (2017) High concentration xylene decomposition and diagnostic analysis by non-thermal plasma in a DBD reactor. IEEE Plasma Sci Technol 19:2017.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-6272/aa632c Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gao J, Ma C, Xing S, Sun L, Liu J (2016) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emissions of non-road diesel engine treated with non-thermal plasma technology. Korean J Chem Eng 33:3425–3433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0222-3 Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Blin-Simiand N, Pasquiers S, Jorand F, Postel C, Vacher J-R (2009) Removal of formaldehyde in nitrogen and in dry air by a DBD: importance of temperature and role of nitrogen metastable states. J Phys D Appl Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/12/122003 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Storch DG, Kushner MJ (1998) Destruction mechanisms for formaldehyde in atmospheric pressure low temperature plasmas. J Appl Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.353828 Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang F, Sun H, Sun J, Jia X, Zhang Y, Tang Y, Pan X, Su Z, Hao L, Wang R (2010) Mechanistic and kinetic study of CH2O + O3 reaction. J Phys Chem 114:3516–3522.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp910754b Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang B, Xu X, Xu W, Wang N, Sun Y, Huang H, Yu L, Fu M, Wu J, Chen L, Ye D (2018) The mechanism of non-thermal plasma catalysis on volatile organic compounds removal. Catal Surv Asia 22:73–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-018-9241-x Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mizuno N, Kamata K (2011) Catalytic oxidation of hydrocarbons with hydrogen peroxide by vanadium-based polyoxometalates. Coord Chem Rev 255:2358–2370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.041 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Payne JH, Jr GFL (1941) The oxidation of aldehydes and hydrogen peroxide. J Am Chem Soc 63:226–228.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01846a053 Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Vereecken L, Harger H, Novelli A (2014) The reactions of Criegee intermediates with alkenes, ozone and carbonyl oxides. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:4039–4049.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp54514h Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.High Voltage Lab, Electrical DepartmentIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations