Advertisement

The God Mysticism Scale: a Brief Version

  • W. Paul Williamson
  • Ralph W. HoodJr
  • Zhuo Job ChenEmail author
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents two studies concerned with developing a brief version of the 32-item God Mysticism Scale (GMS; Hood Jr. and Williamson Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 19(3), 232–244, 2000). Study 1 submitted 12 representative items from the GMS to an exploratory factor analysis and found a two-factor solution (Interpretation, 6 items; Experience, 6 items) that was used to constitute the God Mysticism Scale-Brief (GMS-B). Study 2 examined the construct validity of the GMS-B through a confirmatory factor analysis. The two-factor solution was confirmed, and fit indices revealed a good fit of the model to the data. Other analyses of the GMS-B found sufficient internal consistency (Study 1, Interpretation, α = .94, Experience, α = .86; Study 2, Interpretation, α = .93, Experience, α = .84) and preliminary evidence for criterion validity with religious and spirituality measures. The two studies together indicate that the GMS-B is well grounded in theory, psychometrically sound, and useful as an economic measure of mysticism in God language.

Keywords

Mysticism God mysticism Religious orientation Spirituality Scale construction 

Notes

References

  1. Caird, D. (1988). The structure of Hood’s mysticism scale: A factor analytic study. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Guo, Y., Kopec, J. A., Cibere, J., Li, L. C., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2016). Population survey features and response rates: A randomized experiment. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 1422–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hood, R. W., Jr. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mysticism experience. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hood, R. W., Jr., & Williamson, W. P. (2000). An empirical test of the unity thesis: The structure of mystical descriptors in various faith samples. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 19(3), 232–244.Google Scholar
  6. Hood, R. W., Jr., Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Ghramaleki, A. F., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., et al. (2001). Dimensions of the mysticism scale: Confirming the three-factor structure in the United States and Iran. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 691–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hood, R. W., Jr., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2009). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach (4th ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. James, W. (1982). The varieties of religious experience. New York: Penguin Books. (Original work published in 1902).Google Scholar
  9. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Peytchev, A., & Peytcheva, E. (2017). Reduction of measurement error due to survey length: Evaluation of the split questionnaire design approach. Survey Research Methods, 11, 361–368.Google Scholar
  11. Stace, W. T. (1960). Mysticism and philosophy. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  12. Streib, H., & Hood, R. W. (Eds.). (2016). Semantics and psychology of spirituality. A cross-cultural analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.Google Scholar
  13. Streib, H., Klein, C., Keller, B., & Hood, R. W. (forthcoming). The mysticism scale as measure for subjective spirituality: New results with Hood’s M-scale and the development of a short form. In A. L. Ai, K. A. Harris, & P. Wink (Eds.), Assessing spirituality and religion in a diversified world: Beyond the mainstream perspective (pp. 1–30). Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. Williamson, W. P., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (2012). The Lazarus project: A longitudinal study of spiritual transformation among substance abusers. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 15, 611–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Williamson, W. P., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (2016). Psychology and spiritual transformation in a substance abuse program: The Lazarus project. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Paul Williamson
    • 1
  • Ralph W. HoodJr
    • 2
  • Zhuo Job Chen
    • 3
  1. 1.Henderson State UniversityArkadelphiaUSA
  2. 2.University of Tennessee at ChattanoogaChattanoogaUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations