Advertisement

Thin-walled tubes under torsion: multi-objective optimal design

  • F. Ballo
  • M. GobbiEmail author
  • G. Mastinu
  • G. Previati
Research Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The lightweight design of a thin-walled tube under torsion is addressed in the paper. A multi-objective optimization approach is adopted to minimize the mass while maximizing the structural stiffness of the thin walled tube. Constraints on available room (maximum diameter), safety (admissible stress), elastic stability (buckling), minimum thickness (forced by manufacturing technologies) are included in the problem. The analytical solution of the multi-objective optimization problem is obtained by applying a relaxed formulation of the Fritz John conditions for Pareto-optimality. Relatively simple analytical expressions of the Pareto-optimal set are derived both in the design variables (tube diameter and wall thickness) and objective functions (mass and compliance) domain. Simple practical formulae are provided to the designer for the preliminary design of thin-walled tubes under torsion. Finally, the comparative lightweight design of tubes made from different materials is presented and an application of the derived formulae to a simple engineering problem is discussed.

Keywords

Multi-objective optimization Analytical solution Thin-walled tube Twisted shaft 

Notes

References

  1. Ashby M (2011) Materials selection in mechanical design, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Askar S, Tiwari A (2009) Finding exact solutions for multi-objective optimisation problems using a symbolic algorithm. In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, 18–21 May 2009, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  3. Askar S, Tiwari A (2011) Finding innovative design principles for multiobjective optimization problems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 41(4):554–559.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2010.2081666 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballo F, Gobbi M, Previati G (2017) Optimal design of a beam subject to bending: a basic application. Meccanica.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-017-0682-5
  5. Banichuk NV (1990) Introduction to optimization of structures. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Björck A (1996) Numerical methods for least squares problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, PhiladelphiaCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Crate H, Batdorf S, Baab G (1944) The effect of internal pressure on the buckling stress of thin-walled circular cylinders under torsion. Technical Report L4E27, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  8. Donnell L (1935) Stability of thin-walled tubes under torsion. Technical report 479, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. Dutta J, Lalitha CS (2006) Bounded sets of kkt multipliers in vector optimization. J Glob Optim 36:425–437.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-006-9019-y MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Gobbi M, Mastinu G (2001) On the optimal design of composite material tubular helical springs. Meccanica 36(5):525–553.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015640909013 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Gobbi M, Levi F, Mastinu G (2006) Multi-objective stochastic optimisation of the suspension system of road vehicles. J Sound Vib 298:1055–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gobbi M, Levi F, Mastinu G, Previati G (2014) On the analytical derivation of the pareto-optimal set with an application to structural design. Struct Multidiscip Optim 51(3):645–657MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gobbi M, Previati G, Ballo F, Mastinu G (2017) Bending of beams of arbitrary cross sections—optimal design by analytical formulae. Struct Multidiscip Optim 55:827–838.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406217704678 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haftka R, Gurdal Z (2002) Elements of structural optimization. Kluver, DordrechtzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Kasperska RJ, Magnucki K, Ostwald M (2007) Bicriteria optimization of cold-formed thin-walled beams with monosymmetrical open cross sections under pure bending. Thin Walled Struct 45:563–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim T, Kim Y (2002) Multiobjective topology optimization of a beam under torsion and distortion. AIAA J 40:376–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim D, Lee G, Lee B, Cho S (2001) Counterexample and optimality conditions in differentiable multiobjective programming. J Optim Theory Appl 109:187–192MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Levi F, Gobbi M (2006) An application of analytical multi-objective optimization to truss structures. In: 11th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, 6–8 September 2006, Portsmouth, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  19. Lundquist E (1934) Strength tests on thin-walled duralumin cylinders. Technical report 473, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Mastinu G, Gobbi M, Miano C (2006) Optimal design of complex mechanical systems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Mastinu G, Previati G, Gobbi M (2017) Bending of lightweight circular tubes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 232(7):1165–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406217704678 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Miettinen K (1998) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, 1st edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Ostwald M, Rodak M (2013) Multicriteria optimization of cold-formed thin-walled beams with generalized open shape under different loads. Thin Walled Struct 65:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Papalambros P, Wilde D (2000) Principles of optimal design. Modeling and computation, 1st edn. Cambridge Universirty Press, CambridgeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Previati G, Mastinu G, Gobbi M (2017) On the pareto optimality of Ashby’s selection method for beams under bending. J Mech Des 140(1):014,501.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038296. http://mechanicaldesign.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?
  26. Schwerin E (1924) Torsional stability of thin-walled tubes. In: Proceedings of the first international congress for applied mechanics at Delft, Netherlands, pp 255–265Google Scholar
  27. Wang C (2013) Optimization of torsion bars with rounded polygonal cross section. J Eng Mech 139:629–634.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Young W, Budynas R (1989) Roark’s formulas for stress and strain, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations