Advertisement

Synchronization control of Markov jump neural networks with mixed time-varying delay and parameter uncertain based on sample point controller

  • Nuo Xu
  • Liankun SunEmail author
Original paper
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

This paper put forward an improved synchronization problem for neural networks with Markov jump parameters. The traditional Markov jump neural network (MJNN) only considers the basic external time-varying delays, ignoring both the distributed and leakage delays in the internal transmission of the neural network and the small time-varying errors in the mode switching of Markov probability transition rates. In this paper, we focus on the synchronization of MJNN with mixed time-varying delay. And an improved Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional is constructed. The convergence of inequalities is solved by using affine Bessel–Legendre inequalities and Wirtinger double integral inequalities. At the same time, a new method is used to optimize the mathematical geometric area of the time-varying delay and reduce the conservativeness of the system. Finally, a sample point controller is constructed to synchronize the driving system and the corresponding system.

Keywords

Markov jump parameters Mixed time-varying delay Time-varying transition rates Neural network 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61403278, 61503280). The authors are very indebted to the Editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and valuable suggestions that have helped improve the academic research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn, C.K., Shi, P., Wu, L.: Receding horizon stabilization and disturbance attenuation for neural networks with time-varying delay. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 45(12), 2680–2692 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Briat, C.: Convergence and equivalence results for the Jensen’s inequality—application to time-delay and sampled-data systems. IEEE Transa. Autom. Control 56(7), 1660–1665 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ding, Y., Liu, H.: Stability analysis of continuous-time Markovian jump time-delay systems with time-varying transition rates. J. Frankl. Inst. 353(11), 2418–2430 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gu, K., Kharitonov, V.L., Chen, J.: Stability of Time-Delay Systems. Birkh-user, Boston (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guan, H., Gao, L.: Delay-dependent robust stability and \(H_{\infty }\) control for jump linear systems with interval time-varying delay. In: Proceedings of the 26th Chinese Control Conference, pp. 609–614. IEEE, Zhangjiajie (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gyurkovics, Eva: A Note on Wirtinger-Type Integral Inequalities for Time-Delay Systems. Pergamon Press, Inc, Oxford (2015)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kasemsuk, C., Oyama, G., Hattori, N.: Management of impulse control disorders with deep brain stimulation: a double-edged sword. J. Neurol. Sci. 374, 63–68 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, W.I., Lee, S.Y., Park, P.G.: Affine Bessel–Legendre inequality: application to stability analysis for systems with time-varying delays. Automatica 93, S0005109818301687 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li, R.G., Wu, H.N.: Adaptive synchronization control based on QPSO algorithm with interval estimation for fractional-order chaotic systems and its application in secret communication. Nonlinear Dyn 92(3), 1–25 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, F.F., Zeng, Z.Z.: Synchronization of uncertain fractional-order chaotic systems with time delay based on adaptive neural network control. Acta Phys. Sin. 66, 9 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayer, J., Schuster, H.G., Claussen, J.C., et al.: Corticothalamic projections control synchronization in locally coupled bistable thalamic oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(6), 068102 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mohammadzadeh, A., Ghaemi, S.: Robust synchronization of uncertain fractional-order chaotic systems with time-varying delay. Nonlinear Dyn. 93(4), 1809–1821 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagamani, G., Joo, Y.H., Radhika, T.: Delay-dependent dissipativity criteria for Markovian jump neural networks with random delays and incomplete transition probabilities. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(4), 2503–2522 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagamani, G., Joo, Y.H., Radhika, T.: Delay-dependent dissipativity criteria for Markovian jump neural networks with random delays and incomplete transition probabilities. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(56), 2503–2522 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Novienko, V., Ratas, I.: In-phase synchronization in complex oscillator networks by adaptive delayed feedback control. Phys. Rev. E 98(4), 042302 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nuo, Xu, Sun, L.: An improved delay-dependent stability analysis for Markovian jump systems with interval time-varying-delays. IEEE Access 6, 33055–33061 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park, M., Kwon, O., Park, J.H., Lee, S., Cha, E.: Stability of time-delay systems via Wirtinger-based double integral inequality. Automatica 55, 204–208 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Park, I.S., Kwon, N.K., Park, P.G.: Dynamic output-feedback control for singular Markovian jump systems with partly unknown transition rates. Nonlinear Dyn. 95(4), 1–12 (2019)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rong, Z., Yang, Y., Xu, Z., et al.: Function projective synchronization in drive—response dynamical network. Phys. Lett. A 374(30), 3025–3028 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schibli, T.R., Kim, J., Kuzucu, O., et al.: Attosecond active synchronization of passively mode-locked lasers by balanced cross correlation. Opt. Lett. 28(11), 947–9 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Seuret, A.: Frdric Gouaisbaut. Stability of linear systems with time-varying delays using Bessel–Legendre inequalities. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 63(1), 225–232 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seuret, A., Gouaisbaut, F.: Wirtinger-based integral inequality: application to time-delay systems. Automatica 49(9), 2860–2866 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shu, Y., Liu, X.G., Qiu, S., et al.: Dissipativity analysis for generalized neural networks with Markovian jump parameters and time-varying delay. Nonlinear Dyn. 89(3), 2125–2140 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sun, L., Nuo, X.: Stability analysis of Markovian jump system with multi-time-varying disturbances based on improved interactive convex inequality and positive definite condition. IEEE Access 7, 54910–54917 (2019)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Syed, A.M., Marudai, M.: Stochastic stability of discrete-time uncertain recurrent neural networks with Markovian jumping and time-varying delays. Math. Comput. Model. 54(9–10), 1979–1988 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tao, J., Wu, Z.G., Su, H., et al.: Asynchronous and resilient filtering for Markovian jump neural networks subject to extended dissipativity. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 99, 1–10 (2018)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, J., Luo, Y.: Further improvement of delay-dependent stability for Markov jump systems with time-varying delay. In Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Interligent Control and Automation, pp. 6319-6324. IEEE, Chongqing, (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wang, Y., Xie, L., de Souza, C.E.: Robust control of a class of uncertain nonlinear system. Syst. Control Lett. 19(2), 139–149 (1992)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang, Y.F., Lin, P., Wang, L.S.: Exponential stability of reaction-diffusion high-order Markovian jump Hopfield neural networks with time-varying delays. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 13(3), 1353–1361 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, J., Chen, X., Feng, J., et al.: Synchronization of networked harmonic oscillators subject to Markovian jumping coupling strengths. Nonlinear Dyn. 91(1), 1–13 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu, S., Lam, J., Mao, X.: Delay-dependent \(H_{\infty }\) control and filtering for uncertain Markovian jump systems with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. P. 54(9), 2070–2077 (2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zeng, H.B., He, Y., Wu, M., et al.: Free-matrix-based integral inequality for stablilty analysis of systems with time-varying delay. IEEE Trans. Autumatic Control 60(10), 2768–2772 (2015)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang, X., Lv, X., Li, X.: Sampled-data-based lag synchronization of chaotic delayed neural networks with impulsive control. Nonlinear Dyn. 90(3), 2199–2207 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang, X.M., Han, Q.L., Seuret, A., et al.: An improved reciprocally convex inequality and an augmented Lyapunov–Krasovskii functional for stability of linear systems with time-varying delay. Automatica 84, 221–226 (2017)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhao, X., Zeng, Q.: Delay-dependent stability analysis for Markovian jump systems with interval time-varying-delay. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 7(2), 224–229 (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhi, Z., Liu, K., Wang, W.Q., et al.: Robust adaptive beamforming against mutual coupling based on mutual coupling coefficients estimation. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 99, 1–1 (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhu, X.L., Yang, G.H.: Jensen integral inequality approach to stability analysis of continuous-time systems with time-varying delay. IET Control Theory Appl. 2(6), 524–534 (2008)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and TechnologyTianjin Polytechnic UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations