Advertisement

Natural Hazards

, Volume 94, Issue 3, pp 1141–1162 | Cite as

Review of comparative studies on market mechanisms for carbon emission reduction: a bibliometric analysis

  • Xiang-Yu Wang
  • Bao-Jun Tang
Original Paper

Abstract

This study uses the bibliometric method to analyze the comparative studies on different market mechanisms applied to carbon reduction between 1970 and 2016 based on the online databases of Science Citation Index Expanded (1970–2016) and Social Science Citation Index (2002–2016). We found by observing the characteristics of publications that such studies belong to a multidisciplinary field that has been continuously developing since the 1990s. The USA and the UK have maintained their leading research strengths in the field, whereas China entered late but has developed rapidly. The most productive journal, institution, and author in this field are Energy Policy, Resources for the Future, and Pizer from the USA, respectively. The auctorial and institutional cooperation degrees are growing and still have a broad collaboration space, but the cooperation among countries is fluctuating at a lower level. Nonetheless, the USA keeps its significant international cooperation ties. The bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis reveals that articles in this field are closely related to one another. The basic literature in the field was written by Weitzman and published in 1974, and the article by Nordhaus published in Science in 1992 is the most cited in the field. The analysis of keywords and abstract shows that the hot spots include policy choice, price-versus-quantity analysis, and mechanism design.

Keywords

Carbon emission reduction Market mechanism Prices versus quantities Bibliometrics Statistical analysis Co-occurrence analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71573013, 71521002, 71642004), the Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 9152014), Key Project of Beijing Social Science Foundation Research Base (Grant No.15DJA084) and National Key R&D Program (Grant No. 2016YFA0602603), and Special Items Fund of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education.

References

  1. Aldy JE, Pizer WA (2015) The Competitiveness Impacts of Climate Change Mitigation Policies. J Ass Environ Resource Econ 2:565–595Google Scholar
  2. Bauin S, Michelet B, Schweighoffer MG, Vermeulin P (1991) Using bibliometrics in strategic analysis: “understanding chemical reactions” at the CNRS. Scientometrics 22:113–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumol WJ, Oates WE, Bawa VS, Bradford DF (1998) The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemsitry. Scientometrics 22:155–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Du H, Li N, Brown MA, Peng Y, Shuai Y (2014) A bibliographic analysis of recent solar energy literatures: the expansion and evolution of a research field. Renew Energy 66:696–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elkins P, Baker T (2001) Carbon taxes and carbon emissions trading. J Econ Surv 15:325–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan JL, Liang QM, Wang Q et al (2015) Will export rebate policy be effective for CO 2, emissions reduction in China? A CEEPA-based analysis. J Clean Prod 103:120–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garfield E (2002) From bibliographic coupling to co-citation analysis via algorithmic historio-bibliographyGoogle Scholar
  9. H L (2011) EU Carbon Finance Markets Analysis and References for China. Fudan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  10. Hepburn C (2007) Carbon Trading: A Review of the Kyoto Mechanisms. Ann Rev Environ Resources 32:375–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16569–16572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoel M, Karp L (2001a) Taxes and quotas for a stock pollutant with multiplicative uncertainty. J Public Econ 82:91–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoel M, Karp L (2001b) Taxes versus quotas for a stock pollutant. Resour Energy Econ 24:367–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jacoby HD, Ellerman AD (2002) The safety valve and climate policy. Energy Policy 32:481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jotzo F, Pezzey JCV (2007) Optimal intensity targets for greenhouse gas emissions trading under uncertainty. Environ Resource Econ 38:259–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Law J, Bauin S, Courtial JP, Whittaker J (1988) Policy and the mapping of scientific change: a co-word analysis of research into environmental acidification. Scientometrics 14:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu L, Chen C, Zhao Y, Zhao E (2015) China’s carbon-emissions trading: overview, challenges and future. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mansanetbataller M, Pardo Á (2008) What You Should Know About Carbon Markets. Energies 1:120–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mckibbin WJ, Wilcoxen PJ (2002) The role of economics in climate change policy. J Econ Perspect 16:107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menanteau P, Finon D, Lamy ML (2003) Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31:799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morman ET (1980) Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities by Eugene Garfield. Libr Q Inf Commun Policy 21:714Google Scholar
  22. Murray B, Rivers N (2015) British Columbia’s revenue-neutral carbon tax: a review of the latest “grand experiment” in environmental policy. Energy Policy 86:674–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murray BC, Newell RG, Pizer WA (2009) Balancing cost and emissions certainty: an allowance reserve for cap-and-trade. Soc Sci Electron Publ 3:84–103Google Scholar
  24. Newell RG, Pizer WA (2003) Regulating stock externalities under uncertainty. J Environ Econ Manag 45:416–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newell RG, Pizer WA (2008) Indexed regulation. J Environ Econ Manag 56:221–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Newell R, Pizer W, Zhang J (2005) Managing permit markets to stabilize prices. Environ Resource Econ 31:133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newell RG, Pizer WA, Raimi D (2012) Carbon markets: past, present, and future. Annual Rev Resource Econ 6:191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nordhaus WD (1992) An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases. Science 258:1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pizer WA (1999) The optimal choice of climate change policy in the presence of uncertainty. Resour Energy Econ 21:255–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pizer WA (2002) Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. J Public Econ 85:409–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberts MJ, Spence M (1976) Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. J Public Econ 5:193–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shi HD, Tan LJ (2007) The statistic analysis of novelty search research paper of China during 1985–2006. Mod Inf 27:179–181Google Scholar
  33. Small H (1999) Visualizing science by citation mapping. J Ass Inf Sci Technol 50:799–813Google Scholar
  34. Stavins RN (1996) Correlated Uncertainty and Policy Instrument Choice. J Environ Econ Manag 30:218–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sumner J, Bird L, Dobos H (2011) Carbon taxes: a review of experience and policy design considerations. Clim Policy 11:922–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Venmans F (2012) A literature-based multi-criteria evaluation of the EU ETS. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:5493–5510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang KCM, Wei YM (2017) Forecast and prospect of China ‘s carbon market in 2017. Forecasting and prospects research report. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  38. Weitzman ML (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41:477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weitzman ML (1978) Optimal rewards for economic regulation. Am Econ Rev 68:683–691Google Scholar
  40. Yu H, Wei YM, Tang BJ, Mi Z, Pan SY (2016) Assessment on the research trend of low-carbon energy technology investment: a bibliometric analysis. Appl Energy 184:960–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang YJ, Wei YM (2010) An overview of current research on EU ETS: evidence from its operating mechanism and economic effect. Appl Energy 87:1804–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang K, Wang Q, Liang QM, Chen H (2016) A bibliometric analysis of research on carbon tax from 1989 to 2014. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao YM (2009) Definition, classification and evolution of environmental regulations. China Popul Resour Environ 19:85–90Google Scholar
  44. Zhao XG, Jiang GW, Nie D, Chen H (2016) How to improve the market efficiency of carbon trading: a perspective of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1229–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhong WJ, Li J (2008) The research of co-word analysis(2). J Inf 27:141–143Google Scholar
  46. Zou Y, Gao Y, Liu XY, He QY, Shen LN (2016) Annual report of Beijing carbon market 2016. China Beijing Environment Exchange, Beijing Emissions Trading Association, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Energy and Environmental Policy ResearchBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  3. 3.Beijing Key Lab of Energy Economics and Environmental ManagementBeijingChina
  4. 4.Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of BeijingBeijingChina
  5. 5.Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations