Advertisement

Do subsidies improve the financial performance of renewable energy companies? Evidence from China

  • Zhishuang Zhu
  • Hua Liao
Original Paper

Abstract

The promotion of renewable energy cannot be separated from the support provided by government subsidies. However, the effect of government subsidies is controversial. Taking China’s listed renewable energy companies as examples, this paper analyzes the impact of government subsidies on the financial performance of these companies. The results show that government subsidies do not promote improvements in corporate financial performance, and renewable energy companies are less profitable than other companies. The negative effect of government subsidies on corporate financial performance can be explained mostly by the rent-seeking behavior of firms. The occurrence of subsidy-induced overcapacity and adverse selection and moral hazard created by asymmetric information also weaken the incentive effect of government subsidies to some extent.

Keywords

Renewable energy Government subsidies Rent-seeking behavior Overcapacity Asymmetric information 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by funding from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71673026, 71642004, 71521002, 71322306, 71273027), China’s National Key R&D Program (2016YFA0602801), Joint Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. We appreciate the comments and constructive suggestions from the anonymous referees.

References

  1. An T, Zhou S, Pi J (2009) The stimulating effects of R&D subsidies on independent innovation of Chinese enterprises. Econ Res J 44(10):87–98 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  2. Anderson M, Banker R, Huang R, Janakiraman S (2007) Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs. J Acc Audit Financ 22(1):1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andor M, Voss A (2016) Optimal renewable-energy promotion: capacity subsidies vs. generation subsidies. Resour Energy Econ 45:144–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antoniou F, Strausz R (2017) Feed-in subsidies, taxation, and inefficient entry. Environ Resour Econ 67(4):925–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BP (2017) Statistical review of world energy. British Petroleum, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan R, Feng X (2017) Local government subsidy strategy analysis for new energy vehicles under subsidies recession era. China Popul Resour Environ 27(3):30–38 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  8. Freedman LS, Graubard BI, Schatzkin A (1992) Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Stat Med 11(2):167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han X (2012) An analysis of the problem of overcapacity in China’s new energy industry and policy recommendations: taking the wind energy and solar energy industries as examples. Manag World 8:171–172 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  10. Hao H, Ou X, Du J, Wang H, Ouyang M (2014) China’s electric vehicle subsidy scheme: rationale and impacts. Energy Policy 73:722–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hong J, Koo Y, Jeong G, Lee J (2012) Ex-ante evaluation of profitability and government’s subsidy policy on vehicle-to-grid system. Energy Policy 42(42):95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IEA (2013) Energy Policies of IEA countries: Germany 2013 review. International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC (2013) The fifth assessment report “climate change 2013: the physical science basis”. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang F, Geng Q, Lu D, Li X (2012) Mechanism of excess capacity based on China’s regional competition and market distortion. China Ind Econ 6:44–56 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  15. Kalkuhl M, Edenhofer O, Kai L (2013) Renewable energy subsidies: second-best policy or fatal aberration for mitigation? Resour Energy Econ 35(3):217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin Y, Wu H, Xing Y (2010) “Wave Phenomena” and formation of excess capacity. Econ Res J 45(10):4–19 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  17. Liu G (2016) An analysis of the incentive effect of tax preference and fiscal subsidy policy: an empirical study based on the information asymmetry theory. Manag World 10:62–71 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  18. Metcalf GE (2010) Investment in energy infrastructure and the tax code. Tax Policy Econ 24(1):1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy KM, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Why is rent-seeking so costly to growth? Am Econ Rev 83(2):409–414Google Scholar
  20. Murray BC, Cropper ML, Chesnaye FCDL, Reilly JM (2014) How effective are US renewable energy subsidies in cutting greenhouse gases. Am Econ Rev 104(5):569–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nicolini M, Tavoni M (2017) Are renewable energy subsidies effective? Evidence from Europe. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 74:412–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reichenbach J, Requate T (2012) Subsidies for renewable energies in the presence of learning effects and market power. Resour Energy Econ 34(2):236–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ren S, Zhang J (2013) Subsidy, rent-seeking cost and markup rate: an empirical study based on Chinese equipment manufacturing firms. Manag World 10:118–129 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  24. REN21 (2017) Renewables 2017 global status report. Renewable energy policy network for the 21st Century, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Rezai A, Ploeg FVD (2017) Second-best renewable subsidies to de-carbonize the economy: commitment and the Green Paradox. Environ Resour Econ 66(3):409–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosnes O (2014) Subsidies for renewable energy in inflexible power markets. J Regul Econ 46(3):318–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sampedro J, Arto I, González-Eguino M (2018) Implications of switching fossil fuel subsidies to solar: a case study for the European Union. Sustainability 10(1):1–12Google Scholar
  28. Schwanitz VJ, Piontek F, Bertram C, Luderer G (2014) Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. Energy Policy 67:882–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shi X, Liu X, Yao L (2016) Assessment of instruments in facilitating investment in off-grid renewable energy projects. Energy Policy 95:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shi X, Chen H, Yu Y, Wen F (2018a) Development of variable renewable energy policy in developing countries: a case study of Sri Lanka. Int J Public Policy 14(1/2):10–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shi X, Rioux B, Galkin P (2018b) Unintended consequences of China’s coal capacity cut policy. Energy Policy 113:478–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sobel ME (1987) Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. Soc Methods Res 16(1):155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang Q, Luo D (2007) An empirical study on the motivation and effects of government subsidy: evidence from Chinese listed companies. J Financ Res 6:149–163 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  34. Wang H, Miao X (2013) Research on the game theory of R&D subsidy for new energy vehicles in China. Soft Sci 27(6):29–32 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  35. Wang W, Ming J, Yue C (2014) Enterprise size, local government intervention and overcapacity. Manag World 10:17–36 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  36. Xia F, Song F (2017a) The uneven development of wind power in China: determinants and the role of supporting policies. Energy Econ 67:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xia F, Song F (2017b) Evaluating the economic impact of wind power development on local economies in China. Energy Policy 110:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamamoto Y (2017) Feed-in tariffs combined with capital subsidies for promoting the adoption of residential photovoltaic systems. Energy Policy 111:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang D, Chen Z, Nie PY (2016) Output subsidy of renewable energy power industry under asymmetric information. Energy 117:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang J, Dong J, Hu L (2018) Design government incentive schemes for promoting electric taxis in China. Energy Policy 115:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu D, Lu Y (2015) Government Improper intervention and overcapacity of strategic emerging industries: a case study of Chinese photovoltaic industry. China Ind Econ 10:53–68 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  42. Yu M, Hui Y, Pan H (2010) Political connections, rent-seeking, and the fiscal subsidy efficiency of local governments. Econ Res J 45(3):65–77 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  43. Yu F, Guo Y, Le-Nguyen K, Barnes SJ, Zhang W (2016) The impact of government subsidies and enterprises’ R&D investment: a panel data study from renewable energy in China. Energy Policy 89:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang H, Sheng Z, Meng Q (2015) The government subsidies mechanism for market development of new energy vehicle. J Manag Sci 28(6):122–132 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  45. Zhang H, Zheng Y, Ozturk UA, Li S (2016) The impact of subsidies on overcapacity: a comparison of wind and solar energy companies in China. Energy 94:821–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao C, Wang Z, Yang D, Cao W (2015) Research on the catering behavior of enterprise and government subsidy performance: based on the analysis of the enterprise’s profitability. China Ind Econ 7:130–145 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  47. Zheng Y, Zhu Y (2013) Bank lending incentives and firm investment decisions in China. J Multinatl Financ Manag 23(3):146–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhong T, Du R (2015) A Research of subsidies for new energy vehicles based on game theory. Chin J Manag Sci 23((SI)):817–822 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  49. Zhou Y, Pu Y, Chen S, Fang F (2015) Government support and development of emerging industries: a new energy industry survey. Econ Res J 50(6):147–161 (in Chinese) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP)Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT)BeijingChina
  3. 3.Sustainable Development Research Institute for Economy and Society of BeijingBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of EconomicsShanxi University of Finance and EconomicsTaiyuanChina
  5. 5.Beijing Key Laboratory of Energy Economics and Environmental ManagementBeijingChina
  6. 6.Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations