Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The theoretical relationships between resilience and vulnerability have long been debated, but limited research has been done to test their relationships from an empirical perspective. This study presents an important case to demonstrate the empirical verification of the relationships. After reviewing relevant theories, we propose revisions of two widely adopted disaster risk and vulnerability formulas and apply them in a Taiwanese case of Typhoon Morakot. The data incorporate four natural hazard data sets, a Taiwan Social Change Survey of nonvictims as the reference group, and a longitudinal data set of Social Impact and Recovery Survey for Typhoon Morakot victims (2010–2012). With those data, two sets of models were constructed based on the two revised formulas. The first set of models estimates a disaster risk, defined as the probability and expected value of victimization determined by the typhoon hazard, household’s exposure, and contextual vulnerability composed of social class, ethnicity, education, and family status. The second set of models estimates an affected household’s outcome vulnerability, defined as the continuous trajectory of household living condition consisted of exposure, contextual vulnerability, and resilience. In the second set, outcome vulnerability is measured through household income pre- and post-disaster to depict the impact and dynamism; resilience is measured through social capital variables. Logit, ordinal linear regression (OLS), and fixed-effect regression were applied to statistically estimate the models. The results highlight that contextual vulnerability deteriorates the disaster risk of typhoon. Resilience has an impact on outcome vulnerability, but its effect is uncertain, likely to be restricted in the disaster recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source see Table 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24:347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich DP (2012) Building resilience: social capital in post-disaster recovery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich DP, Crook K (2008) Strong civil society as a double-edged sword: sitting trailers in post-Katrina New Orleans. Political Res Q 61:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich DP, Meyer MA (2015) Social capital and community resilience. Am Behav Sci 59:254–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béné C, Wood RG, Newsham A, Davies M (2012) Resilience: New Utopia or New Tyranny? Reflection about the potentials and limits of the concept of resilience in relation to vulnerability reduction programmes IDS working papers 2012:1–61 doi:10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00405.x

  • Berkes F (2007) Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking. Nat Hazard 41:283–295. doi:10.1007/s11069-006-9036-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle HG, Downing TE, Watts MJ (1994) Climate change and social vulnerability: toward a sociology and geography of food insecurity. Glob Environ Chang 4:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand FX, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckle P (2006) Assessing social resilience. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C Thomas, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Gunderson LH (2001) Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. Bioscience 51:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County South Carolina. Ann Ass Am Geogr 90:713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84:242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Barnes L, Berry M, Burton C, Evans E, Tate E, Webb J (2008) A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Glob Environ Chang 18:598–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilley M, Chen R, Deichmann U (2005) Natural disaster hotspots: a global risk analysis. World Bank Hazard Management Unit, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:365–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott J, Haney T, Sams-Abiodum P (2010) Limits to social capital: comparing network assistance in two New Orleans neighbors devastated by Hurricane Katrina. Sociol Q 51:624–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson R, Goldthorpe JH (1992) The constant flux: a study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frigerio I, De Amicis M (2016) Mapping social vulnerability to natural hazards in Italy: a suitable tool for risk mitigation strategies. Environ Sci Policy 63:187–196. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Chang 17:155–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2009) Review and quantitative analysis of indices of climate change exposure, adaptive capacity, sensitivity, and impacts: background note to the world development report 2010. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research

  • Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Chang 75:301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Chang 16:293–303. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison MEB, Sasser DD (2009) Families and disasters: making meaning out of adversity. In: Cherry KE (ed) Lifespan perspectives on natural disasters: coping with Katrina, Rita, and other storms. Springer, New York, pp 113–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen V, Kaltenborn BP, Williams DR (2016) A bridge over troubled water: a contextual analysis of social vulnerability to climate change in a riverine landscape in south-east Norway Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift—Norwegian. J Geogr 70:216–229. doi:10.1080/00291951.2016.1194317

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439

  • Gunderson LH (2010) Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural disasters. Ecol Soc 15:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines VA, Hurlbert JS, Beggs JJ (1996) Exploring the determinants of support provision: provider characteristics, personal networks, community contexts, and support following life events. J Health Soc Behav 37:252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins RL, Maurer K (2010) Bonding, bridging and linking: how social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Br J Soc Work 40:1777–1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 292–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins D (2015) Applying a comprehensive contextual climate change vulnerability framework to New Zealand’s tourism industry. Ambio 44:110–120. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0525-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hout M (1983) Mobility tables. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.

  • Hsu H-H, Chou C, Wu YC, Lu MM, Chen CT, Chen YM (2011) Climate change in taiwan: scientific report 2011. National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan

  • Hurlbert J, Haines VA, Beggs J (2000) Core networks and tie activation: what kinds of routine networks allocated resources in nonroutine situations? Am Sociol Rev 65:598–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p 976

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working group II contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report—changes to the underlying scientific/technical assessment. Intergovernmental panel on climate change

  • Joakim E, Mortsch L, Oulahen G (2015) Using vulnerability and resilience concepts to advance climate change adaptation. Environ Hazard 14:137–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongman B, Winsemius HC, Aerts JCJH, de Perez EC, van Aalst MK, Kron W, Ward PJ (2015) Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112:E2271–E2280 doi:10.1073/pnas.1414439112

  • Kaniasty K, Norris FH (1993) A test of the social support deterioration model in the context of natural disaster. J Personal Soc Psychol 64:395–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE (2005) The social contours of risk: risk analysis, corporations and the globalization of risk, vol II. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Nicholls R, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environ Hazard 5:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koks EE, Jongman B, Husby TG, Botzen WJW (2015) Combining hazard, exposure and social vulnerability to provide lessons for flood risk management. Environ Sci Policy 47:42–52. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korup O, Clague JJ (2009) Natural hazards, extreme events, and mountain topography. Quatern Sci Rev 28:977–990. doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2009.02.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlicke C (2013) Resilience: a capacity and a myth: findings from an in-depth case study in disaster management research. Nat Hazard 67:61–76. doi:10.1007/s11069-010-9646-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N (2001) Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin KH, Polsky C (2015) Indexing livelihood vulnerability to the effects of typhoons in indigenous communities of Taiwan. Geogr J. doi:10.1111/geoj.12141

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin KH, Chang YC, Liu GY, Chan CH, Lin TH, Yeh CH (2015) An interdisciplinary perspective on social and physical determinants of seismic risk. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 15:2173–2182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucini B (2013) Social capital and sociological resilience in megacities context. Int J Disaster Resil Built Environ 4:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludena CE, Yoon SW (2015) Local vulnerability indicators and adaptation to climate change: a survey. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Luers AL, Lobell David B, Sklar Leonard S, Lee Addams C, Matson Pamela A (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley Mexico. Glob Environ Chang 13:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyena SB (2006) The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters 30:433–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller F et al (2010) Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecol Soc 15:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MPDRC (2012) An innovative approach for post-disaster reconstruction of Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. Morakot post-disaster reconstruction council, Executive Yuan, Republic of China, Taipei, Taiwan

  • MPDRC (2014) Morakot Typhoon post-disaster reconstruction council, Executive Yuan’s five-year mission successful closes on August 8th, 2014, http://morakotdatabase.nstm.gov.tw/88flood.www.gov.tw/files/committee_other/219.pdf?id=219&type=pdf&location=committee_other

  • Murphy DJ, Wyborn C, Yung L, Williams DR (2015) Key concepts and methods in social vulnerability and adaptive capacity. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Colorako

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • NCDR (2012) Social impacts and recovery survey of Typhoon Morakot, wave 1~3. National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction, New Taipei City, Taiwan. doi:https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/group/sciitem/3/1384. https://srda.sinica.edu.tw/group/sciitem/3/1674

  • NHRA (2015) Natural Hazards Risk Atlas. http://maplecroft.com/

  • O’Brien K et al (2004) Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: climate change and globalization in India. Glob Environ Chang 14:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen SH, Nygaard L, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7:73–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okpara UT, Stringer LC, Dougill AJ (2016) Perspectives on contextual vulnerability in discourses of climate conflict. Earth Syst Dyn 7:89–102. doi:10.5194/esd-7-89-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (1998) Participation, social capital and vulnerability to urban flooding in Guyana. J Int Dev 10:469–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSCS (2010) Taiwan social change survey. Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. doi:http://www.ios.sinica.edu.tw/sc/cht/scDownload.php

  • Turner BL II (2010) Vulnerability and resilience: coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science? Glob Environ Chang 20:570–576. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NJ, Clifton H (2009) “It’s so different today”: climate change and indigenous lifeways in British Columbia, Canada. Glob Environ Chang 19:180–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDRO (1980) Natural disasters and vulnerability analysis. UNDRO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2015) Adoption of the Paris Agreement. United Nations framework convention on climate change

  • UNISDR (2004) Living with risks: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. United Nations Publication, Geneva, Switzerland. doi:http://www.unisdr.org/files/657_1wr1.pdf

  • Veland S, Howitt R, Dominey-Howes D, Thomalla F, Houston D (2013) Procedural vulnerability: understanding environmental change in a remote indigenous community. Glob Environ Chang 23:314–326. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (Project NO. 104-2410-H-001-002-MY2). The authors also like to thank Ms. Rico Yang for her assistance on data management.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, 128 Sec. 2 Academia Rd., Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan

    Kuan-Hui Elaine Lin

  2. George Perkins Marsh Institute, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA, 01610-1477, USA

    Kuan-Hui Elaine Lin

  3. National Science and Technology Center for Disaster Reduction (NCDR), 9F, No.200, Sec. 3, Beisin Rd., Sindian District, New Taipei City, 23143, Taiwan

    Hsiang-Chieh Lee

  4. Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, 128 Sec. 2 Academia Rd., Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan

    Thung-Hong Lin

Authors
  1. Kuan-Hui Elaine Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hsiang-Chieh Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thung-Hong Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thung-Hong Lin.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, KH.E., Lee, HC. & Lin, TH. How does resilience matter? An empirical verification of the relationships between resilience and vulnerability. Nat Hazards 88, 1229–1250 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2916-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-017-2916-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation