Advertisement

Line Length in Old English Poetry: A Chronological and Stylistic Criterion

  • Leonard NeidorfEmail author
  • Yi Zhao
  • Jie Yu
Article

Abstract

This article presents the first systematic, quantitative assessment of line length in Old English poetry. Its aim is to determine whether line length can be used as a reliable criterion in studies pertaining to relative chronology and authorship attribution. Our findings indicate that line length is a rather complicated criterion, which is affected not only by language change, but also by subject matter and other non-linguistic variables. Nevertheless, we conclude that critical application of the criterion of line length can yield substantial insights into the dating and authorship of Old English poetry.

Keywords

Old English poetry Digital humanities Beowulf Menologium Cynewulf 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Wang Shouren, Yang Jincai, Wang Jinghua, He Ning, Chen Bing, and all of our other colleagues at Nanjing University who have supported our Old English research group. We also thank R.D. Fulk, Megan Hartman, Rafael J. Pascual, and Geoffrey Russom for helpfully commenting on the draft of this article.

References

  1. Bliss, A. J. (1962). The appreciation of Old English metre. In N. Davis & C. L. Wrenn (Eds.), English and medieval studies presented to J.R.R. Tolkien on the occasion of his seventieth birthday (pp. 27–40). London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  2. Bliss, A. J. (1967). The metre of Beowulf (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bredehoft, T. A. (2014). The date of composition of Beowulf and the evidence of metrical evolution. In L. Neidorf (Ed.), The dating of Beowulf: A reassessment (pp. 97–111). Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  4. Brodeur, A. G. (1970). Beowulf: One poem or three? In J. Mandel & B. A. Rosenberg (Eds.), Medieval literature and folklore studies: Essays in honor of Francis Lee Utley (pp. 3–26). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cable, T. (1981). Metrical style as evidence for the date of Beowulf. In C. Chase (Ed.), The dating of Beowulf (pp. 197–211). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cronan, D. (2004). Poetic words, conservatism, and the dating of Old English poetry. Anglo-Saxon England, 33, 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doane, A. N. (Ed.). (2013). Genesis A: A new edition, revised. Tempe: ACMRS.Google Scholar
  8. Drout, M. D. C., Kisor, Y., Smith, L., Dennett, A., & Piirainen, N. (2016). Beowulf unlocked: New evidence from lexomic analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ecay, A. and S. Pintzuk. (2016). The syntax of Old English poetry and the dating of Beowulf. In L. Neidorf, R. J. Pascual, and T. Shippey (Eds.), Old English philology: Studies in honour of R. D. Fulk (pp. 144–171). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  10. Fulk, R. D. (1992). A history of Old English meter. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fulk, R. D. (1996). Rhetoric, form, and linguistic structure in early Germanic verse: Toward a synthesis. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis, 1, 63–88.Google Scholar
  12. Fulk, R. D. (Ed. & Trans.). (2010). The Beowulf manuscript: Complete texts, and the Fight at Finnsburg. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fulk, R. D., Bjork, R. E., & Niles, J. D. (Eds.). (2008). Klaeber’s Beowulf and the fight at Finnsburg (4th ed.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  14. Griffith, M. S. (Ed.). (1997). Judith. Exeter: Exeter University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Griffith, M. S. (2012). The register of divine speech in Genesis A. Anglo-Saxon England, 41, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartman, M. E. (2011). A drawn-out beheading: Style, theme, and hypermetricity in the Old English Judith. Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 110, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartman, M. E. (2014a). The form and style of gnomic hypermetrics. Studia metrica et poetica, 1, 68–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hartman, M. E. (2014b). The limits of conservative composition in Old English poetry. In L. Neidorf (Ed.), The dating of Beowulf: A reassessment (pp. 79–96). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  19. Hieatt, C. (1980). Judith and the literary function of Old English hypermetric lines. Studia Neophilologica, 52, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karasawa, K. (Ed.). (2015). The Old English metrical calendar (Menologium). Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  21. Kiernan, K. S. (1981). Beowulf and the Beowulf manuscript. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Krapp, G. P., & Dobbie, E. V. K. (Eds.) (1931–1953). The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records. 6 vols. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lapidge, M. (2000). The archetype of Beowulf. Anglo-Saxon England, 29, 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lapidge, M. (2006). An aspect of Old English poetic diction: The postpositioning of prepositions. In John Walmsley (Ed.), Inside Old English: Essays in honour of Bruce Mitchell (pp. 153–180). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liuzza, R. M. (1995). On the dating of Beowulf. In P. S. Baker (Ed.), Beowulf: Basic readings (pp. 281–302). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  26. Magoun, F. P., Jr. (1958). Béowulf Á: A folk-variant. Arv: Journal of Scandinavian Folklore, 14, 95–101.Google Scholar
  27. Magoun, F. P., Jr. (1963). Béowulf B: A folk-poem on Beowulf’s death. In A. Brown & P. Foote (Eds.), Early English and Norse studies presented to Hugh Smith in honour of his sixtieth birthday (pp. 127–140). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  28. Neidorf, L. (2013). The dating of Widsið and the study of Germanic antiquity. Neophilologus, 97, 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neidorf, L. (2013–2014). Lexical evidence for the relative chronology of Old English poetry. SELIM, 20, 7–48.Google Scholar
  30. Neidorf, L. (2016a). On the dating and authorship of Maxims I. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 117, 137–153.Google Scholar
  31. Neidorf, L. (2016b). Philology, allegory, and the dating of Beowulf. Studia Neophilologica, 88, 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neidorf, L. (2016c). The composite authorship of The Dream of the Rood. Anglo-Saxon England, 45, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neidorf, L. (2017). The transmission of Beowulf: Language, culture, and scribal behavior. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neidorf, L. (2018). The archetype of Beowulf. English Studies, 99, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neidorf, L., & Pascual, R. J. (2014). The language of Beowulf and the conditioning of Kaluza’s law. Neophilologus, 98, 657–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Brien O’Keeffe, K. (1990). Visible song: Transitional literacy in Old English verse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Orton, P. R. (2000). The transmission of Old English poetry. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
  38. Pascual, R. J. (2013–2014). Three-position verses and the metrical practice of the Beowulf poet. SELIM, 20, 49–79.Google Scholar
  39. Pascual, R. J. (2016). Sievers, Bliss, Fulk, and Old English metrical theory. In L. Neidorf, R. J. Pascual, & T. Shippey (Eds.), Old English philology: Studies in honour of R. D. Fulk (pp. 17–33). Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  40. Pascual, R. J. (2017). Oral tradition and the history of English alliterative verse. Studia Neophilologica, 89, 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Russom, G. (2002). Dating criteria for Old English poems. In D. Minkova & R. Stockwell (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language: A millennial perspective (pp. 245–266). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Russom, G. (2004). The evolution of Middle English alliterative meter. In A. Curzan & K. Emmons (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language II: Unfolding conversations (pp. 279–304). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Russom, G. (2017). The evolution of verse structure in Old and Middle English poetry: From the earliest alliterative poems to iambic pentameter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schücking, L. L. (1905). Beowulfs Rückkehr: Eine kritische Studie. Halle: M. Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  45. Shippey, T. A. (1993). Old English poetry: The prospects for literary history. In A. León Sendra (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference of SELIM (Spanish Society for English Medieval Language and Literature) (pp. 164–179). Córdoba: SELIM.Google Scholar
  46. Terasawa, J. (2011). Old English meter: An introduction. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanjing UniversityNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations