Aristocratic Alienation and Byronic Rebellion in Stendhal’s Armance, Le Rose et le vert, and Mina de Vanghel

  • George M. RosaEmail author


In this article, I examine some intertwined themes that link Stendhal’s first novel, Armance (1827), to two of his subsequent works of fiction: the incomplete novel Le Rose et le vert, written in 1837, and its precursor, a fragmentary novelette entitled Mina de Vanghel, written in 1829–30. The article demonstrates that the heroes of Armance and Le Rose et le vert—Vicomte Octave de Malivert and Duc Léon de Montenotte, respectively—resemble one another in numerous ways, most notably in their aversion for and Byronic rebellion against the aristocratic elite to which they belong. The article further demonstrates that Lord Byron’s notorious failure in marriage and his consequent reputation in the beau monde for monstrousness are evoked indirectly in Armance and directly in Le Rose et le vert to help explain the fears of and failures in marriage of the heroes of the two novels. My analysis of Octave’s and Léon’s social predicament as alienated aristocrats, of their rebellion against their own class, of their antipathy to high society’s marriage market, of their troubled relations with the women they love, and of the dreams of derogation and escape that they share with those women reveals their deep kinship not only with one another and with Lord Byron (or, rather, with Lord Byron as Stendhal whimsically perceived him), but also with the male and female protagonists of Mina de Vanghel.


Stendhal Armance Le Rose et le vert Mina de Vanghel Byron Byronism Alienation Rebellion Aristocracy Derogation Marriage 


  1. Byron, G. G., Lord. (1903). Don Juan. In E. H. Coleridge (Ed.) (vol. 6), The works of Lord Byron: Poetry. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  2. Crouzet, M. (1974). Le Réel dans Armance. Passions et société ou le cas d’Octave: Étude et essai d’interprétation. In C. Duchet (Ed.), Le Réel et le texte (pp. 31–110). Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  3. Estève, E. (1929). Byron et le romantisme français. Paris: Boivin.Google Scholar
  4. MacCarthy, F. (2002). Byron: Life and legend. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  5. Rosa, G. M. (1982). Byronism and babilanisme in Armance. The Modern Language Review, 77(4), 797–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rosa, G. M. (1987). Sailing to Mount Kalos: The poetical dénouement of Armance. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 23(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Rosa, G. M. (1994). Byron, Mme de Staël, Schlegel, and the religious motif in Armance. Comparative Literature, 46(4), 346–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rosa, G. M. (2012). Too mad to marry: Bryon, Rousseau, Othello, and Stendhal’s Octave de Malivert. Nineteenth-Century French Studies, 40(3–4), 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Stendhal. (1972). Lord Byron en Italie. In V. del Litto & E. Abravanel (Eds.), Œuvres complètes (Vol. 46, pp. 239–257). Genève: Cercle du Bibliophile.Google Scholar
  10. Stendhal. (1973). In V. del Litto (Ed.), Voyages en Italie. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  11. Stendhal. (1994). In J.-J. Labia (Ed.), Armance. Paris: GF Flammarion.Google Scholar
  12. Stendhal. (1998). In J.-J. Labia (Ed.), Le Rose et le vert, Mina de Vanghel, suivis de Tamira Wanghen et autres fragments inédits. Paris: GF Flammarion.Google Scholar
  13. Thompson, C. W. (1983). Les Clefs d’Armance et l’ambivalence du génie romantique du nord. Stendhal Club, 25(100), 520–547.Google Scholar
  14. Thompson, C. W. (1987). Stendhal connaisseur de l’improper: de Byron à William Courtenay, lord Link et Balzac. Stendhal Club, 29(114), 113–139.Google Scholar
  15. Thompson, C. W. (2004). Armance et la représentation du mâle depuis Rousseau. In K. Asbury & M.-E. Plagnol-Diéval (Eds.), Le Mâle en France 1715–1830: Représentations de la masculinité (pp. 305–317). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Media B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lafayette CollegeEastonUSA

Personalised recommendations