Disturbing Histories, Multilayered Traumas, and De-centered Subjectivities in Lan Cao’s Monkey Bridge

  • Sule Okuroglu OzunEmail author


Monkey Bridge is a novel by Lan Cao which focuses on the complexities of the Vietnamese refugee experience through the relationship between teenage Mai Nguyen and her mother Thanh, and their interlocked stories. Vietnamese Mai flees to America on the day Saigon falls in 1975, settles in Falls Church and her mother, Thanh, joins Mai in Virginia a few months later. Through the mother/daughter and first/second generation immigrant relationships, Monkey Bridge reflects the diasporic, ethnic, linguistic and cultural negotiations both the mother and daughter should handle with in order to make a future in the United States. Implications of war on the Vietnamese families, characters’ struggle of trying to become American and also remaining Vietnamese at the same time, the loss of ancestral land, maternal body, and memory are the central issues that Lan Cao lays bare for her readers. The relationship between the mother and daughter is predominantly shaped by the traumatic memories in both women’s lives, with each responding in her own way. Rather than claiming that trauma shatters identity, Monkey Bridge suggests that trauma as a provocative paradigm deconstructs and reconstructs previous perceptions of self, reality and individuals’ relations to the world. The aim of this article is to analyse how traumatic memories with regard to life in exile, generational gaps, and biculturalism affect subjectivity of the main characters, Mai and Thanh, in the novel.


Trauma Vietnam War Lan Cao Monkey Bridge Vietnamese-American identity Diasporic subjectivity 


  1. Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  2. Bhabha, H. (1983). The other question…. Screen, 24(6), 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of diaspora. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Cao, L. (1997). Monkey Bridge. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1966). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis. New York: Norton Company.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, S. (1994). Cultural identity and diaspora. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 392–401). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  8. Hartman, G. H. (1995). On traumatic knowledge and literary studies. New Literary History, 26(3), 537–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heide, K. M. (2012). Understanding parricide: When sons and daughters kill parents, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horrors: An essay on abjection. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. LaCapra, D. (2000). Writing history, writing trauma. New York: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J. (1974). The language of psycho-analysis. New York: Norton Company.Google Scholar
  13. Satterlee, M. (2004). How memory haunts: The impact of trauma on Vietnamese immigrant identity in Lan Cao’s Monkey Bridge. Studies in the Humnities, 31(2), 138–162.Google Scholar
  14. Stocks, C. (2004). Bridging the gaps: Inescapable history in Lan Cao’s Monkey Bridge. Studies in the Literary Imagination, 2004, 1–15.Google Scholar
  15. Tuon, B. (2012). “An outsider with inside information:” The 1.5 generation in Lan Cao’s Monkey Bridge. Post-Colonial Text, 7(1), 1–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Media B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Suleyman Demirel UniversityIspartaTurkey
  2. 2.The University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations