Regional differences in aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seedling response to an established nursery protocol
- 11 Downloads
In seedling-based reforestation operations, seed source is known to be an influential variable affecting outplanting success. Adaptive variation among seed sources may also be an important factor in the effectiveness of standardized nursery protocols for seedling production. Particularly for wide-ranging species, regional optimizations of nursery protocols may be necessary to ensure consistent production of quality seedling stock. Quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) is one such species, possessing the broadest distribution of any tree in North America. However, research on nursery protocols specific to aspen has focused on seed sources from a limited region in western boreal Canada. A well-established protocol shown to be effective for these boreal aspen uses a shoot growth inhibitor designed to maximize desirable seedling quality traits for outplanting success. We used this protocol on seeds sourced from two different regions in the southwestern portion of the species range (Utah and New Mexico, USA) and compared their response in the same nursery environment to that of a seedlot from Alberta, Canada to determine whether this protocol is also applicable for these very different regions. Seedlings from Utah and New Mexico differed significantly in their response to the protocol from the Alberta source, developing smaller root-to-stem ratios and sequestering less carbohydrate and nutrient reserves. Seedlings from Utah and New Mexico sources also differed from each other, with New Mexico seedlings growing larger according to all metrics. These results indicate that aspen nursery protocols will benefit from regional modification in order to optimize seedling stock quality and trait consistency.
KeywordsAspen restoration US Intermountain West Growth and carbon allocation Nutrient reserves
We would like to thank Tammy Parsons, Lorenzo Gallegos, and Joshua Trujillo (New Mexico State University) for nursery assistance and Pak Chow (University of Alberta) for laboratory assistance. Funding for this research was provided by the Utah Agriculture Experiment Station Cedar Mountain Initiative (approved as journal paper number UAES #9166), the USDA McIntire-Stennis program through New Mexico State University (#1002447), the Utah State University Office of Research and Graduate Studies, and the US Department of Agriculture Food and Agricultural Sciences National Needs Graduate Fellowship Program.
- Burdett AN (1979) A nondestructive method for measuring the volume of intact plant parts. Can J For 9:120–122Google Scholar
- Evelyn J (1664) Sylva: or a discourse of forest trees and the propagation of timber. Arthur Doubleday & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Fox TR, Jokela EJ, Allen HL (2007) The development of pine plantation silviculture in the southern United States. J For 105:337–347Google Scholar
- Kalra YP, Maynard DG (1991) Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
- Landhäusser SM, Rodriguez-Alvarez J, Marenholtz EH, Lieffers VJ (2012b) Effect of stock type characteristics and time of planting on field performance of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seedlings on boreal reclamation sites. New For 43:679–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-012-9346-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Landis TD (2011) The target plant concept—a history and brief overview. In: Riley LE, Haase DL, Pinto JR (technical coordinators) National proceedings: forest and conservation nursery associations—2010. Proc. RMRS-P-65. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp 61–66. https://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p065/rmrs_p065_061_066.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2019
- Macdonald SE, Quideau SA, Landhäusser SM (2012) Rebuilding boreal forest ecosystems after industrial disturbance. In: Vitt D, Bhatti J (eds) Restoration and reclamation of boreal ecosystems, attaining sustainable development. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 123–161. ISBN 9781107015715Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 11 June 2019.
- South DB (1996) Top-pruning bareroot hardwoods: a review of the literature. Tree Plant Notes 47:34–40Google Scholar