Cone structure and seed development in grafted witches’ broom and normal crown clones from the same trees of Pinus sibirica
- 23 Downloads
Mutational witches’ broom represents a fragment of the tree crown with slower shoot growth, abnormally dense branching, decreased apical dominance and often with abundant cone-bearing compared with a normal crown. Mutational witches’ broom is a major source for the majority of ornamental dwarf conifer cultivars with abundant branching. Pinus sibirica is also capable of forming mutational witches’ brooms. The species has valuable edible seeds, and therefore, dwarf cultivars with abundant cone-bearing could be used to establish cone crop plantations. To reveal how the mutation causing witches’ broom affects the quality of cones and seeds, we carried out a comparative analysis of cone size, cone structure and seed quality in six grafted clones with witches’ broom and normal clones from the same trees, determining seed losses at the different developmental stages. Cones from mutant clones had 1.5–2.9 times smaller size than normal clones. Cones from 50% of the normal clones were more elongated in shape. In mutant clones, the numbers of fertile scales and ovules were 1.4 times lower than in normal clones. Seeds had a smaller size in all mutant clones, and seed quality and seed efficiency were lower in two-thirds of the clones compared with normal clones. Seed losses were observed at different developmental stages, but there were significantly more losses before pollination and during embryo development in mutants. Therefore, the majority of mutants had small cones and therefore a rather ornamental value because of reduced seed efficiency and small seeds. At the same time, individual mutant clones had a seed efficiency and the number of filled seeds close to those of normal clones. They could therefore be promising as cone-bearing cultivars for the commercial production of pine kernel.
KeywordsWitches’ broom Female cones Pinus sibirica Du Tour Somatic mutation, crop plantation
This work was partly supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research [Grant No. 16-04-00440-a] and Russian Academy of Sciences (Program of basic research in state academies, Theme 52.2.6).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Buckland DC, Kuijt J (1957) Unexplained brooming of Douglas-fir and other conifers in British Columbia and Alberta. For Sci 3:236–242Google Scholar
- Duffield J, Wheat J (1963) Dwarf seedlings from broomed douglas-fir. Silvae Genet 12:129–133Google Scholar
- Farjon A (2017) A handbook of the world’s conifer, 2nd edn. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- Fordham AJ (1967) Dwarf conifers from witches’-brooms. Arnoldia 24:29–50Google Scholar
- Johnson AG, Pauley SS, Cromell WH (1965) Dwarf seedlings from witches’ brooms in jack pine II. Minn For Notes 163Google Scholar
- Johnson AG, Pauley SS, Cromell WH (1968) Pine dwarf segregates from witches’-brooms. Proc Int Plant Propag Soc 18:265–270Google Scholar
- Khirov AA (1973) Witches’ broom on Pinus sylvestris. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 58:433–436Google Scholar
- Money NP (2007) The triumph of the fungi: a rotten history. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Morozov A (2004) Survey of illegal forest felling activities in Russia (forms and methods of illegal cuttings). M.: Greenpeace Russia. http://old.forest.ru/eng/publications/illegal/. Accessed 18 May 2018
- Niklas K (1994) Plant allometry: the scaling of form and process. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Rudolph TD, O’Malley DM, Reed EA (1983) Potential for indirect selection of rescued jack pine embryos based upon linkage between seedling dwarfism and megagametophyte allozymes. In: Proceedings of the north central tree improvement conference, pp 162–174Google Scholar
- Skousen JG, Dallaire K, Scagline-Mellor S, Monteleone A, Wilson-Kokes L, Joyce J, Thomas C, Keene T, DeLong C, Cook T, Jacobs DF (2018) Plantation performance of chestnut hybrids and progenitors on reclaimed Appalachian surface mines. New For 49:599–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9643-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vrgoc P (1999) Cluster analysis of height and crown density of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) witches brooms progenies. Ann For 24:24–57Google Scholar
- Vrgoc P (2002) Witches’ broom of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) and its use for new ornamentals. In: Van Huylenbroeck J et al., (eds), In: Proceedings of XX international eucarpia symposium, section ornamentals, strategies for new ornamentals—part II, pp 199–205Google Scholar
- Yamburov MS (2010) Mutational witches’ brooms in some Pinaceae species. In: Extended abstract of Ph.D. dissertation. Positive-NB, TomskGoogle Scholar
- Yamburov MS, Goroshkevich SN (2007) Witches’-brooms in Siberian stone pine as somatic mutations: occurrence, features and possibility of using in breeding programs. Khvoynyye borealnoy zony 24:317–324Google Scholar
- Yamburov MS, Goroshkevich SN (2008) Witches’ brooms in Siberian stone pine as somatic mutations and initial genetic material for breeding of nut-bearing and ornamental cultivars. Ann For Res 51:165–166Google Scholar