Propofol Resistance of Functional Domains with Orientation and Direction Sensitivity of the Primary Visual Cortex in Rats

  • V. S. Bugrova
  • I. V. BondarEmail author

A method consisting of optical mapping of the intrinsic signal was used to study the activity of functional domains of the primary visual cortex at the population level in response to changes in the stimulus situation. Transient administration of propofol on the background of stable anesthesia allowed determination of the extent to which different functional domains of the cortex are stable to the systemic action of pharmacological agents. This substance was selected for the experiments because published data have demonstrated its affinity for GABAA receptors. Experiments were performed on seven adult clinically healthy cats. Analysis of the experimental data identified statistically significant differences between the responses of direction and orientation columns: signals in orientation domains were 1.6 times greater than responses in modules with directional selectivity. Analysis of changes in the structure of optical maps (i.e., the characteristic patterns of the distribution of functional columns in areas of the visual cortex) showed decreases in the level of correlation between the regions of interest by 60% for direction maps and 40% for orientation maps. Orientation columns were more stable to propofol. Additional analysis addressed the stability of the encoding of defined orientations in the cortex, which showed that the functional elements of the cortex with the greatest stability were those detecting near-vertical orientations.


primary visual cortex functional domains with orientation and direction stability optical mapping of the intrinsic signal propofol 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chapman, B. and Bonhoeffer, T., “Overrepresentation of horizontal and vertical orientation preferences in developing ferret area 17,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, No. 5, 2609–14 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chapman, B., Zahs, K. R., and Stryker, M. P., “Relation of cortical cell orientation selectivity to alignment of receptive fields of the geniculocortical afferents that arborize within a single orientation column in ferret visual cortex,” J. Neurosci., 11, No. 5, 1347–58 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coppola, D. M., Purves, H. R., McCoy, A. N., and Purves, D., “The distribution of oriented contours in the real world,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 4002–4006 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferster, D., Chung, S., and Wheat, H., “Orientation selectivity of thalamic input to simple cells of cat visual cortex,” Nature, 380, No. 6571, 249–52 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grinvald, A., Frostig, R. D., Lieke, E., and Hildesheim, R., “Optical imaging of neuronal activity,” Physiol. Rev., 68, No. 4, 1285–1366 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hillier, D., Fiscella, M., Drinnenberg, A., et al., “Causal evidence for retina-dependent and -independent visual motion computations in mouse cortex,” Nat. Neurosci., 20, No. 7, 960–968 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N., “Receptive fi elds, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex,” J. Physiol., 160, 106–54 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ivanov, R. S., Bondar, I. V., Saltykov, K. A., and Shevelev, I. A., “The area of zones of optical activation in cortical fi eld 17 of the cat brain on presentation of grids in different orientations,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 4, 516–522 (2006).Google Scholar
  9. Katzner, S., Busse, L., and Carandini, M., “GABAa inhibition controls response gain in visual cortex,” J. Neurosci., 31, No. 16, 5931–41 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kelly, S. T., Kremkow, J., Jin, J., et al., “The role of thalamic population synchrony in the emergence of cortical feature selectivity,” PLoS Comput. Biol., 10, No. 1, e1003418 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuleshova, E. P., “Optogenetics – new potentials for electrophysiology,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 67, No. 5, 18–31 (2017).Google Scholar
  12. Li, B., Peterson, M. R., and Freeman, R. D., “Oblique effect: a neural basis in the visual cortex,” J. Neurophysiol., 90, No. 1, 204–17 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lien, A. D. and Scanziani, M., “Tuned thalamic excitation is amplified by visual cortical circuits,” Nat. Neurosci., 16, No. 9, 1315–23 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., et al., “Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal,” Nature, 412, No. 6843, 150–7 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lyamzin, D. R., Bondar, I. V., and Ivanov, R. S., “Processing of functional maps of the visual cortex of the brain obtained using intrinsic optical signals,” Ros. Fiziol. Zh., 9, No. 4, 335–346 (2009).Google Scholar
  16. Moore, C. I., Carlen, M., Knoblich, U., and Cardin, J. A., “Neocortical interneurons: from diversity, strength,” Cell, 142, No. 2, 189–93 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelson, S., Toth, L., Sheth, B., and Sur, M., “Orientation selectivity of cortical neurons during intracellular blockade of inhibition,” Science, 265, No. 5173, 774–7 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Priebe, N. J., “Mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the primary visual cortex,” Annu. Rev. Vis. Sci., 2, 85–107 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shen, W., Liang, Z., and Shou, T., “Weakened feedback abolishes neural oblique effect evoked by pseudo-natural visual stimuli in area 17 of the cat,” Neurosci. Lett., 437, No. 1, 65–70 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stanley, G. B., Jin, J., Wang, Y., et al., “Visual orientation and directional selectivity through thalamic synchrony,” J. Neurosci., 32, No. 26, 9073–88 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vanni, M. P., Provost, J., Casanova, C., and Lesage, F., “Bimodal modulation and continuous stimulation in optical imaging to map direction selectivity,” Neuroimage, 49, No. 2, 1416–1431 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vidyasagar, T. R., Pei, X., and Volgushev, M., “Multiple mechanisms underlying the orientation selectivity of visual cortical neurones,” Trends Neurosci., 19, No. 7, 272–7 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Volgushev, M., Vidyasagar, T. R., and Pei, X., “A linear model fails to predict orientation selectivity of cells in the cat visual cortex,” J. Physiol., 1, No. 3, 597–606 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yip, G. M., Chen, Z. W., Edge, C. J., et al., “A propofol binding site on mammalian GABAA receptors identified by photolabeling,” Nat. Chem. Biol., 9, No. 11, 715–20 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zepeda, A., Arias, C., and Sengpiel, F., “Optical imaging of intrinsic signals recent developments in the methodology and its applications,” J. Neurosci. Meth., 136, No. 1, 1–21 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and NeurophysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations