Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 49, Issue 8, pp 972–978 | Cite as

Activity of the Serotonin System of the Prefrontal Cortex in Rats with High and Low Level of Contextual Fear Generalization

  • N. B. SaulskayaEmail author
  • O. E. Marchuk

Intracerebral microdialysis studies in rats showed that acquisition of a conditioned fear reaction (combination of conditioned sound signal with pain reinforcement in chamber A) was accompanied by serotonin release in the medial prefrontal cortex, which did not occur in animals of the control group (same procedure but without pain stimulation). The level of serotonin release seen during acquisition of the fear reaction was high in animals demonstrating significant freezing (a measure of fear) in chamber B, not associated with pain reinforcement (high level of contextual fear generalization). Serotonin release in rats with low levels of freezing in chamber B (low contextual fear generalization) was low and did not correlate with freezing in chamber A. These data provide evidence that activation of the serotoninergic input of the medial prefrontal cortex on acquisition of the conditioned reflex fear reaction predicted the level of generalization of the contextual component of this reaction.


serotonin release medial prefrontal cortex vital intracerebral microdialysis contextual fear generalization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. B. Saulskaya and P. V. Sudorgina, “Activity of the nitrergic system of the medial prefrontal cortex in rats with high and low generalization of conditioned reflex fear reactions,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 3, 372–381 (2015).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. C. Azmitia and M. Segal, “An autoradiographic analysis of the differential ascending projections of the dorsal and median raphe nuclei in the rat,” J. Comp. Neurol., 179, No. 3, 641–667 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. P. Bauer, “Serotonin in fear conditioning processes,” Behav. Brain Res., 277, No. 15, 68–77 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Celeda, V. Puig, and F. Artigas, “Serotonin modulation of cortical neurons and networks,” Front. Integr. Neurosci., Art. 25 (2013), doi: 10.3389.fnint.2013.00025.7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. E. Dusmoor, S. R. Mitroff, and K. S. LaBar, “Generalization of conditioned fear along a dimension of increasing fear intensity,” Learn. Mem., 16, No. 7, 460–469 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. H. Gotlib and J. Joormann, “Cognition and depression: current status and future directions,” Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., 6 285–312 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Greenberg, J. M. Carlson, J. Cha, et al., “Ventromedial prefrontal cortex reactivity is altered in generalized anxiety disorder during fear generalization,” Depress. Anxiety, 30, No. 3, 242–250 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Jovanovic, A. Kazama, J. Bachevalier, and M. Davis, “Impaired safety signal learning may be a biomarker of PTSD,” Neuropharmacology, 62, No. 2, 695–704 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. N. Kaczkurkin, P. C. Burton, S. M. Chazin, et al., “Neural substrates of overgeneralized conditioned fear in PTSD,” Am. J. Psychiatry, 174, No. 2, 125–134 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. J. Kim and W. J. Jung, “Neural circuits and mechanisms involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning: a critical review,” Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 30, No. 2, 188–202 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. C. Klemenhagen, J. A. Gordon, D. J. David, et al., “Increased fear response to contextual cues in mice lacking the 5-HT1A receptor,” Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, No. 1, 101–111 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. E. LeDouxe, “Emotional circuits in the brain,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 23, 155–184 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Likhtik, J. M. Stujenske, M. A. Topiwala, et al., “Prefrontal entrainment of amygdala activity signals safety in learned fear and innate anxiety,” Nat. Neurosci., 17, No. 1, 106–113 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Lissek, D. E. Bradford, R. P. Alvarez, et al., “Neural substrates of classically conditioned fear-generalization in human: a parametric fMRI study,” Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci., 9, No. 8, 1134–1142 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Mork, R. V. Russel, I. E. M. de Jong, and G. Smagin, “Effects of the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist idalopiridine on extracellular levels of monoamines, glutamate and acetylcholine in the rat medial prefrontal cortex,” Eur. J. Pharmacol., 799, 1–6 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. V. Puig, F. Artigas, and P. Celada, “Modulation of the activity of pyramidal neurons in rat prefrontal cortex by raphe stimulation in vivo: Involvement of serotonin and GABA,” Cereb. Cortex, 15, No. 1, 1–14 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. R. Rozeske, S. Valerio, F. Chaudun, and C. Herry, “Prefrontal neuronal circuits of contextual fear conditioning,” Genes Brain Behav., 14, No. 1, 22–36 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. B. Saulskaya and N. V. Fofonova, “Effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate on extracellular citrulline level in the rat nucleus accum bens,” Neurosci. Lett., 407, No. 1, 91–95 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    F. Sotres-Bayon and G. J. Quirk, “Prefrontal control of fear: more than just extinction,” Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 20, No. 2, 231–235 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Xu and T. C. Sudhof, “A neural circuit for memory specificity and generalization,” Science, 339, No. 6125, 1290–1295 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    S. Yoshitake, E. Kuteeva, T. Hokfelt, et al., “Correlation between the effects of local and intracerebroventricular infusions of the galanin on 5-HT release studied by microdialysis, and distribution of galanin and galanin receptors in prefrontal cortex, ventral hippocampus, amygdala, hypothalamus, and striatum of awake rats,” Synapse, 68, No. 5, 179–193 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Zelikowsky, S. Bissiere, T. A. Hast, et al., “Prefrontal microcircuit underlies contextual learning after hippocampal loss,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, No. 4, 9938–9943 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pavlov Institute of PhysiologyRussian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations