Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 640–643 | Cite as

Free Will: A Neuroeconomic Approach

  • V. A. KlucharevEmail author
Article
  • 5 Downloads

This paper assesses a number of contemporary neurophysiological and philosophical approaches to the problem of the existence of free will. We present arguments demonstrating the weakness of the positions of modern scientific schools maintaining conventional concepts of freedom of choice in humans. The paper demonstrates that the operation of stochastic processes in the nervous system and the existence of top-down neurophysiological influences on perception and behavior in humans are not sufficient arguments for fundamental freedom of choice.

Keywords

freedom of choice neuroeconomics decision-taking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., and Baumeister, R. F., Are We Free?: Psychology and Free Will, OUP USA (2008).Google Scholar
  2. Basten, U., Biele, G., Heekeren, H. R., and Fiebach, C. J., “How the brain integrates costs and benefi ts during decision making,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, No. 50, 21767–72 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., and Damasio, A. R., “Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy,” Science, 275, No. 5304, 1293–1295 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eco, U., The Island of the Day Before [Russian translation], Corpus (2016).Google Scholar
  5. Gianotti, L. R. R., Figner, B., Richard, P., et al., “Why some people discount more than others: baseline activation in the dorsal PFC mediates the link between COMT genotype and impatient choice,” Front. Neurosci., 6, 54 (2012).Google Scholar
  6. Gianotti, L. R., Knoch, D., Faber, et al., “Tonic activity level in the right prefrontal cortex predicts individuals’ risk taking,” Psychol. Sci., 20, No. 1, 33–8 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glimcher, P. W., “The neurobiology of visual-saccadic decision making,” Annu. Rev. Neurosci., 26, 133–79 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., and Rangel, A., “Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system,” Science, 324, No. 5927, 646–648 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Heatherton, T. F. and Wagner, D. D., “Cognitive neuroscience of self-regulation failure,” Trends Cogn. Sci., No. 3, 132–139 (2011).Google Scholar
  10. Heekeren, H. R., Marrett, S., Bandettini, P. A., and Ungerleider, L. G., “A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain,” Nature, 431, No. 7010, 859–861 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ivanitsky, A. M., “Determinism and freedom of choice in the operation of the brain,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 4, 503–512 (2015).Google Scholar
  12. Kahneman, D. A., “Perspective on judgment and choice,” Am. Psychol., 697–729 (2003).Google Scholar
  13. Kane, R (ed.), Free Will, Wiley-Blackwell (2001).Google Scholar
  14. Klucharev, V. A., Shmids, A., and Shestakova, A. N., “Neuroeconomics: neurobiology of decision-taking,” Eksperim. Psikhol., 4, No. 2, 14–35 (2011).Google Scholar
  15. Knoch, D., Pascual-Leone, A., Meyer, K., et al., “Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex,” Science, 314, No. 5800, 829–832 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., et al., “The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, No. 42, 15273–15278 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Libet, B., “Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action,” Behav. Brain Sci., 8, 529–566 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., and Cohen, J. D., “Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards,” Science, 306, 503–507 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Penrose, R., Shadows of the Mind: Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Part I: Why We Need New Physics to Understand the Mind [Russian translation] Institute of Computer Technology, Izhevsk (2003).Google Scholar
  20. Razeev, D. N., “The problem of free will in the context of neuroscience research,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 67, No. 6, pp. 721–727 (2017).Google Scholar
  21. Simonov, P. V., Lectures on the Operation of the Brain. A Needs-Information Theory of Higher Nervous Activity, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (1998).Google Scholar
  22. Soon, C., Brass, M., Heinze, H.-J., and Haynes, J.-D., “Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain,” Nat. Neurosci., 11, No. 5, 543–545 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sperry, R. U., “The perspectives of the mentalist revolution. The appearance of the new scientifi c philosophy,” in: Brain and Mind [Russian translation], D. I. Dubrovsky (ed.), Nauka, Moscow (1994), pp. 20–44.Google Scholar
  24. Sugrue, L. P., Corrado, G. S., and Newsome, W. T., “Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making,” Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 6, 363–375 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson, P., Cannon, T. D., and Toga, A. W., “Mapping genetic influences on human brain structure,” Ann. Med., 34, No. 7–8, 523–536 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Inwagen, P., “The incompatibility of free will and determinism,” Philisoph. Studies, 27. No. 3, 185–199 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wegner, D. M., Sparrow, B., and Winerman, L. J., “Vicarious agency: experiencing control over the movements of others,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 86, No. 6, 838–848 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Center for Neuroeconomics and Cognitive ResearchNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations