Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 629–639 | Cite as

The Problem of Free Will and Modern Neuroscience

  • D. I. DubrovskyEmail author
Article
  • 6 Downloads

This article discusses the various manifestations of free will. Making it an adequately defined subject for neuroscientific study requires basic phenomenological analysis. The inadequacy of denying free will on the basis of Libet’s and Soon’s experiments is demonstrated. The manifestations of free will are the phenomena of subjective reality. The question is how they are connected with cerebral processes. An information-based approach is proposed to answer this difficult question. Mental causality is regarded as informational causality and is linked with the concept of “top-down emergent causality” [Sperry, 1994], which provides an explanation of free will as an expression of the process of self-organization or self-determination at the level of the Ego system of the brain. The strategic importance of neuroscientific investigations of the problem of the “I” and the activity of consciousness as the ability to express will are emphasized.

Keywords

free will consciousness subjective reality informational approach to the “consciousness and the brain” problem informational causality mental causality top-down regulation self-determination the problem of “I.” 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anokhin, K. V., “The brain and memory: the biology of traces of past time,” Vestn. Ross. Akad. Nauk., 80, No. 5–6, 455–461 (2010).Google Scholar
  2. Balaban, P. M. and Gulyaeva, N. V., “Neurophilosophy,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 4, 498–502 (2015).Google Scholar
  3. Bunge, M., The Mind-Brain Problem: A Psycho-Biological Approach, Oxford, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  4. Carnap, R., “Logical foundations of the unity of science,” in: Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York (1949), pp. 409–417.Google Scholar
  5. Damasio, A., Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain, Vintage Books, London (2012).Google Scholar
  6. Dubrovsky, D. I. (editor in chief of the series Neurophilosophy), Current Questions in Neurophilosophy, IIntel, Moscow (2016).Google Scholar
  7. Dubrovsky, D. I., “Manifestations of consciousness and the brain: the problem of deciphering their neurodynamic codes (Report to the Scientific Session of the General Congress of the Russian Academy of Sciences, ‘The Brain: Basic and Applied Problems,’ Dec. 15, 2009),” in: The Brain: Basic and Applied Problems, Nauka, Moscow (2010b), pp. 128–136.Google Scholar
  8. Dubrovsky, D. I., “The problem of the idea,” in: Subjective Reality, Mysl, Moscow (1983), 1st ed.; Kanon+, Moscow (2002), 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  9. Dubrovsky, D. I., “The psychophysiological problem and an informational approach,” in: Methodological Aspects of Studies of Brain Activity, Nauka, Moscow (1986), pp. 108–134.Google Scholar
  10. Dubrovsky, D. I., “Why subjective reality, or ‘why do information processes not run in the dark?’ A response to D. Chalmers,” Vopr. Filosof., No. 3, 90–104 (2007).Google Scholar
  11. Dubrovsky, D. I., Deception: A Philosophical-Psychological Analysis, Kanon+, Moscow (2010a), 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  12. Dubrovsky, D. I., Information, Consciousness, Brain, Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow (1980).Google Scholar
  13. Dubrovsky, D. I., Mental Manifestations and the Brain: A Philosophical Analysis of the Problem in Relation to Some Current Tasks in Neurophysiology, Psychology, and Cybernetics, Nauka, Moscow (1971).Google Scholar
  14. Dubrovsky, D. I., The Problem of Consciousness and the Brain: A Theoretical Solution, Kanon+, Moscow (2015).Google Scholar
  15. Dubrovsky, D., The Problem of the Ideal: The Nature of Mind and its Relationship to the Brain and Social Medium, Progress Publishers, Moscow (1988).Google Scholar
  16. Fromm, E, Escape from Freedom [Russian translation], Progress, Moscow (1990).Google Scholar
  17. Hameroff, S. R. and Penrose, R., “Conscious events as orchestrated spacetime selections,” J. Consc. Studies, 3, No. 1, 36–53 (1996).Google Scholar
  18. Hempel, K. G., “The logical analysis of psychology,” in: Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York (1949), pp. 378–387.Google Scholar
  19. Ivanitsky, A. M., “Determinism and freedom of choice in the operation of the brain,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 4, 503–512 (2015).Google Scholar
  20. Ivanitsky, A. M., “Gerald Edelman and Giulio Tononi’s book ‘Consciousness. How materials acquire the ability to imagine,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 52, No. 3, 377–384 (2002).Google Scholar
  21. Ivanitsky, A. M., “Reading the brain: advances, perspectives, and ethical problems,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 62, No. 2, 133–142 (2012).Google Scholar
  22. Ivanov-Smolenskii, A. G., Handbook for Experimental Studies of Higher Nervous Activity in Humans, Moscow (1970).Google Scholar
  23. Levin, G. D., A Treatise on Free Will, Kanon+, Moscow (2009).Google Scholar
  24. Libet, B., “Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary actions,” Behav. Brain Sci., 8, 529–566 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Litvak, L. M., “Life after Death”: Near-Death Experiences and the Nature of Psychosis. Experience of Self-Observation and Psychoneurological Studies, D. I. Dubrovsky (ed.), Kanon+, Moscow (2007).Google Scholar
  26. Margolis, J., Persons and Minds: The Prospects of Nonreductive Materialism, Dordrecht, Boston (1978).Google Scholar
  27. Matyushkin, D. P., “Possible neurophysiological bases of the nature of the inner ‘I’ in humans,” Fiziol. Cheloveka, 33, No. 4, 1–10 (2007).Google Scholar
  28. Matyushkin, D. P., “Psychophysiology from the point of view of cellular and systems-information approaches,” Sist. Psikhol. Sotsiol., 1, No. 2 (2010).Google Scholar
  29. Mishura, A. S., “The problem of free will and neuropsychology,” Psychology. Histor.-Crit. Rev. Curr. Res., No. 1–2, 6–29 (2013).Google Scholar
  30. Owen, A. M., Coleman, M. R., Boly, et al., “Detecting awareness in the vegetative state,” in: Horizons in Cognitive Psychology [Russian translation], Yazyki Slav. Kultur, Moscow (2012), pp. 123–127.Google Scholar
  31. Panov, A. D., “The problem of consciousness in fundamental physics. Technological singularity, Penrose’s theorem of artificial intelligence and the quantum nature of consciousness,” Metafizika, 3, No. 9, 142–188 (2013).Google Scholar
  32. Penrose, R., Shimony, A., Cartwright, N., and Hawking, S., The Large, the Small, and the Human Mind [Russian translation], M. Longeir (ed), Mir, Moscow (2004).Google Scholar
  33. Pratt, C. C., Free Will. Mind, Matter and Methods, Minneapolis (1966), pp. 182–190.Google Scholar
  34. Ramachandran, V. S., The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientist’s Quest for What Makes Us Human [Russian translation], Kar’era Press, Moscow (2014).Google Scholar
  35. Razeev, D. N., “The problem of free will in the context of neuroscience research,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 67, No. 6, 721–727 (2017).Google Scholar
  36. Renan, E., Marcus Aurelius and the End of the Ancient World [Russian translation], Terra, Moscow (1991).Google Scholar
  37. Ryle, G., The Concept of Mind, London (1976).Google Scholar
  38. Simonov, P. V., Lectures on the Operation of the Brain. A Needs-Information Theory of Higher Nervous Activity, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow (1998).Google Scholar
  39. Smith, R., “Free will: Western alternatives to biological reductionism [Russian translation],” Filosof. Zh., 10, 23–33 (2013).Google Scholar
  40. Soon, C. S., Brass, M., Heinze, H. J., and Haynes, J., “Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human Nature,” Neuroscience, 11, 543–545 (2008).Google Scholar
  41. Sperry, R. W., “Forebrain commissurotomy and conscious awareness,” J. Med. Philosoph., 2, 116–125 (1977).Google Scholar
  42. Sperry, R. W., “The perspectives of the mentalist revolution. The appearance of the new scientific philosophy,” in: Brain and Mind [Russian translation], D. I. Dubrovsky (ed.), Nauka, Moscow (1994), pp. 20–44.Google Scholar
  43. Swartz, N., “Emergence and materialist theories of sentience,” The Philosophy Forum, 14, No. 3 (1975).Google Scholar
  44. Vasilyev, V. V., The Difficult Problem of Consciousness, Progress-Traditsiya, Moscow (2009).Google Scholar
  45. Wegner, D. M., The Illusion of Conscious Will, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yulina, N. S., “Roger Penrose: Searching for a locus of mentality in the quantum microworld,” Vopr. Filosof., 2012, 6, 116–129Google Scholar
  47. Zakharov, V. D., “R. Penrose on consciousness: an apophatic approach,” Metafizika, No. 3, 199–207 (2013).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theory of Consciousness Sector, Institute of PhilosophyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations