Consciousness and the Problem of Free Will

  • V. M. AllakhverdovEmail author

This brief commentary on the papers by A. M. Ivanitsky and D. N. Razeev makes an attempt to show why the problem of free will cannot be solved “in the context of neuroscience.” An approach to solving this problem in the logic of conscious activity is proposed.


free will determinism consciousness cognition paradox 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allakhverdov, V. M., “The mind and consciousness in the logic of cognition,” Vestn. St. Peters. Gos. Univ. Ser. 16. Psikhol. Pedag., No. 1, pp. 35–36 (2016).Google Scholar
  2. Allakhverdov, V. M., Consciousness as a Paradox, DNK, St. Petersburg (2000).Google Scholar
  3. Allakhverdov, V. M., Experience of Theoretical Psychology (in the genre of the scientific revolution), Pech. Dvor, St. Petersburg (1993).Google Scholar
  4. Allakhverdov, V. M., Gershkovich, V. A., Karpinskaya, et al., “The heuristic potential of Ya. A. Ponomarev’s concept,” Psikhol. Zh., 36, No. 6, 24–34 (2015).Google Scholar
  5. Bargh, J. A. and Ferguson, M. J., “Beyond Behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes,” Psychol. Bull., 126, No. 6, 925–945 (2000).Google Scholar
  6. Ivanitsky, A. M., “Determinism and freedom of choice in the operation of the brain,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 65, No. 4, 503–512 (2015).Google Scholar
  7. Kant, I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Collected Works [Russian translation], Choro, Moscow (1994), Vol. 4, pp. 153–246.Google Scholar
  8. Razeev, D. N., “The problem of free will in the context of neuroscience research,” Zh. Vyssh. Nerv. Deyat., 67, No. 6, 721–727 (2017).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General PsychologySt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations