Advertisement

Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 539–543 | Cite as

Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training in Patients with Poststroke Cognitive Impairments

  • S. V. Prokopenko
  • A. F. BezdenezhnykhEmail author
  • E. Yu. Mozheyko
  • E. M. Zubrickaya
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Objectives. To assess the effectiveness of computer programs in the rehabilitation of poststroke cognitive impairments as compared with distracting computer games. Materials and methods. The study included 68 patients aged 40–65 years, who were randomized to three groups: a study group (neuropsychological computer programs), an active control group (distracting games), and a passive control group (standard rehabilitation). Results. Analysis of the coefficient of effectiveness revealed statistically significant advantages in the study group over the passive control group (MoCA, MMSE, Schulte) and the active control group (MoCA). Conclusions. Neuropsychological computer programs demonstrated their effectiveness in restoring poststroke cognitive impairments as compared with courses of standard rehabilitation and distracting computer games.

Keywords

computerized cognitive training; neuropsychological rehabilitation stroke cognitive impairments 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    M. A. Cherdak and N. N. Yakhno, “Neurodegenerative and vascular factors in the development of poststroke cognitive impairments,” Nevrol. Zh., 5, No. 10–15 (2012),  https://doi.org/10.18821/1560-9545-2012-17-5-10-15.
  2. 2.
    S. T. Pendlebury and P. M. Rothwell, “Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis,” Lancet Neurol., 8, No. 11, 1006–1018 (2009),  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70236-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Narasimhalu, S. Ang, D. A. De Silva, et al., “The prognostic effects of poststroke cognitive impairment no dementia and domain-specific cognitive impairments in nondisabled ischemic stroke patients,” Stroke, 42, No. 4, 883–888 (2011),  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.594671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Fride, T. Adamit, A. Maeir, et al., “What are the correlates of cognition and participation to return to work after first ever mild stroke? What are the correlates of cognition and participation to return to work after first ever mild stroke?” Top. Stroke Rehabil., 22, No. 5, 317–325 (2015),  https://doi.org/10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. D. Korczyn, M. Brainin, and A. Guekht, “Neuroprotection in ischemic stroke: What does the future hold?” Expert Rev. Neurother., 15, No. 3, 227–229 (2015),  https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.2015.1014806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. D. Cicerone, D. M. Langenbahn, C. Braden, et al., “Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008,” Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 92, No. 4, 519–530 (2011),  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. Zucchella, A. Capone, V. Codella, et al., “Assessing and restoring cognitive functions early after stroke,” Funct. Neurol., 29, No. 4, 255–262 (2014),  https://doi.org/10.11138/FNeur/2014.29.4.255.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Virk, T. Williams, R. Brunsdon, et al., “Cognitive remediation of attention deficits following acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Neurorehabilitation, 36, No. 3, 367–377 (2015),  https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-151225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xu X-D, Ren H-Y, R. Prakash, Vijayadas, and R. Kumar, “Outcomes of neuropsychological interventions of stroke,” Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol., 16, No. 3, 319–328 (2013),  https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.116909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. V. Prokopenko, E. Yu. Mozheiko, O. S. Levin, et al., “Cognitive impairments and their correction during the acute period of ischemic stroke,” Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiat., 112, No. 8, Iss. 2, 35–39 (2012).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. V. Prokopenko, E. Y. Mozheyko, M. M. Petrova, et al., “Correction of poststroke cognitive impairments using computer programs,” J. Neurol. Sci., 325, No. 1–2, 148–153 (2013),  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2012.12.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Prokopenko
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. F. Bezdenezhnykh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • E. Yu. Mozheyko
    • 1
    • 2
  • E. M. Zubrickaya
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Voino-Yasenetskii Krasnoyarsk State Medical UniversityRussian Ministry of HealthKrasnoyarskRussia
  2. 2.Federal Siberian Scientific Clinical CenterFederal Medical Biological AgencyKrasnoyarskRussia

Personalised recommendations