Advertisement

Proactive Management of Ecosystem Services in Oil Sands Pre-mining Phase

  • A. O. OmotehinseEmail author
  • G. De Tomi
  • Yvette Baninla
Original Paper
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Ecosystems and their services are essential to human well-being, but mining activities often cause adverse impacts on these services. Although impact of mining activities is experienced throughout the life of a mine, pre-mining phase was considered in this research because it determines the relationship of the mining industries with the community. In addition, mining companies must be conscious of how to mitigate its impacts on the environment in every stage as much as possible. Past researchers either have stated the impacts of pre-mining on the environment not explicitly considering the ecosystem services, or they have assessed the effects of mining on the ecosystem not taking into account the pre-mining activities or the ecosystem services. In this research, an existing methodology of ecosystem services was applied to the oil sands deposits located in Ondo state, Nigeria. The results include an appraisal of the demographic information, land use maps, types of ecosystems, ecosystem services, and the use of these services to the communities. The results of the prioritized ecosystem service, proposed mitigation measures that can be taken, and an assessment on the outcome of the proposed mitigation measures on the ecosystem services were also obtained. The conclusions are that the ecosystem service review can be an appropriate approach for mitigating impacts of pre-mining activities on ecosystem services. However, the ecosystem services methodology that was applied can be improved by assessing the outcome of the mitigation measures to know if there will be any significant reduction in impact occurrences and by giving the feedback of the mitigation measures to the community.

Keywords

Oil sands Ondo state, Nigeria Pre-mining activities Ecosystem services Mitigation measures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The researchers acknowledge the support granted to the first author by The Federal University of Technology Akure (FUTA), Nigeria, in carrying out the research in Ondo state, Nigeria. This research was sponsored by the scholarship provided to the first author by the Petroleum Technology Development Fund (PTDF), Nigeria.

Supplementary material

11053_2019_9505_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (585 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 584 kb)

References

  1. Aigbedion, I., & Iyayi, S. E. (2007). Environmental effect of mineral exploitation in Nigeria. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 2, 33–38.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Usmani, S. M. P. (2011). Impact of mining activities on land and water areas of Goa. Journal of Coastal Environment, 2(1), 43.Google Scholar
  3. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of knowledge management, 7(1), 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton, P., Love, D., Mahachi, H., & Dirks, P. (2001). An overview of the impact of mining and mineral processing operations on water resources and water quality in the Zambezi, Limpopo and olifants catchments in Southern Africa. Mining, mineral and sustainable development project 362, doi: ENV-P-C 2001-042.Google Scholar
  5. Butt, A., Shabbir, R., Ahmad, S. S., & Aziz, N. (2015). Land use change mapping and analysis using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Simly watershed, Islamabad, Pakistan. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 18(2), 251–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaudhary, S., McGregor, A., Houston, D., & Chettri, N. (2018). Environmental justice and ecosystem services: A disaggregated analysis of community access to forest benefits in Nepal. Ecosystem Services, 29, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chindo, M. I. (2012). An examination of the socio-economic and environmental impact of planned oil sands development in Nigeria. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
  8. Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., et al. (2017). Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosystem Services, 28, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature’s Services. Washington, DC: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Island Press.Google Scholar
  11. Daily, G. C., Soderqvist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P. R., et al. (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289(5478), 395–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning. Management and Decision Making. Ecological complexity, 7(3), 260–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Department of Environmental Affairs, Department of Mineral Resources, Chamber of Mines (2013). Mining and biodiversity guideline: Mainstreaming biodiversity into the mining sector. Pretoria. South African Mining and Biodiversity Forum, and South African National Biodiversity Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Di Gregorio, A., & Jansen, L. J. M. (2000). Land cover classification system (LCCS): Classification concepts and user manual. Environment and natural resources service. GCP/RAF/287/ITA Africover—East Africa Project and Soil Resources, Management and Conservation Service, Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
  15. Egoh, B. N., Reyers, B., Rouget, M., & Richardson, D. M. (2011). Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 1642–1650.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ezeaku, P. I. (2012). Evaluating the influence of open cast mining of solid minerals on soil, land use and livelihood systems in selected areas of Nasarawa State, North-Central Nigeria. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment, 4(3), 62–70.  https://doi.org/10.5897/JENE11.032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fedele, G., Locatelli, B., & Djoudi, H. (2017). Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience. Ecosystem Services, 28, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giri, C., Zhu, Z., & Reed, B. (2005). A comparative analysis of the global land cover 2000 and MODIS land cover data sets. Remote Sens Environ, 94(1), 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutti, B., Aji, M. M., & Magaji, G. (2012). Environmental impact of natural resources exploitation in Nigeria and the way forward. Journal of Applied Technology in Environmental Sanitation, 2(2), 95–102.Google Scholar
  20. Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J., Iceland, C., & Finisdore, J. (2012). The corporate ecosystem services review: Guidelines for identifying business risks and opportunities arising from ecosystem change. Version 2.0. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  21. Hilson, G. M. (2002). The future of small-scale mining: Environmental and socioeconomic perspectives. Futures, 34, 863–872.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)00044-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunz, T. H., Braun de Torrez, E., Bauer, D., Lobova, T., & Fleming, T. H. (2011). Ecosystem services provided by bats. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1223(1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landsberg, F., Ozment, S., Sticker, M., Henninger, N., Treweek, J., Venn, O., & Mock, G. (2011). Ecosystem services review for impact assessment: Introduction and guide to scoping world. Available at http://www.wri.org/publication/ecosystem-services-review-for-impact-assessment.
  24. Landsberg, F., Treweek, J., Stickler, M., Henninger, N., & Venn, O. (2013). Weaving ecosystem services into impact assessment. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Larondelle, N., & Haase, D. (2012). Valuing post-mining landscapes using an ecosystem services approach—An example from Germany. Ecological Indicators, 18, 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luoma, T., Paasi, J., & Valkokari, K. (2010). Intellectual property in inter-organizational relationships—Findings from an interview study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(03), 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McKenney, B. A., & Kiesecker, J. M. (2010). Policy Development for Biodiversity Offsets: A Review of Offset Frameworks. Environmental Management, 45(1), 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  29. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  30. Miranda, M., Burris, P., Bingcang, J. F., Shearman, P., Briones, J. O., Viña, A. L., et al. (2003). Mining and critical ecosystems : mapping the risks. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.014.Google Scholar
  31. Musa, H. D., & Jiya, S. N. (2011). An assessment of mining activities impact on vegetation in Bukuru Jos Plateau State Nigeria using normalized differential vegetation index (NDVI). Journal of Sustainable Development, 4, 150–159.  https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v4n6p150.Google Scholar
  32. NBBN Implementing the Mitigation Hierarchy (2016). Presented by National Biodiversity and Business. https://www.ewt.org.za/BUSINESSDEVELOPMENT/
  33. Newman, A. M., Rubio, E., Caro, R., Weintraub, A., & Eurek, K. (2010). A review of operations research in mine planning. Interfaces, 40(3), 222–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Network IUCN (XXXX) De Beers Group of Companies.Google Scholar
  35. Oladipo, O. G., Olayinka, A., & Awotoye, O. O. (2014). Ecological Impact of Mining on Soils of Southwestern Nigeria. Environmental and Experimental Biology, 12, 179–186.Google Scholar
  36. Olander, L. P., Johnston, R. J., Tallis, H., Kagan, J., Maguire, L. A., Polasky, S., et al. (2018). Benefit relevant indicators: Ecosystem services measures that link ecological and social outcomes. Ecological Indicators, 85, 1262–1272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Omotehinse, A. O., & Ako, B. D. (2019). The environmental implications of the exploration and exploitation of solid minerals in Nigeria with a special focus on Tin in Jos and Coal in Enugu. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 18(1), 18–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsm.2018.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Persson, L., Arvidson, A., Lannerstad, M., Lindskog, H., Morrissey, T., Nilsson, L., & Senyagwa, J. (2010). Impacts of pollution on ecosystem services for the millennium development goals. Stockholm Environment Institute, pp. 978–991.Google Scholar
  39. Pring, G., Otto, J., & Naito, K. (1999). Trends in international environmental law affecting the minerals industry. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law, 17, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rwanga, S. S., & Ndambuki, J. M. (2017). Accuracy assessment of land use/land cover classification using remote sensing and GIS. International Journal of Geosciences, 8(04), 611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Small, N., Munday, M., & Durance, I. (2017). The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits. Global Environmental Change, 44, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood, G. (2008). Thresholds and criteria for evaluating and communicating impact significance in environmental statements: ‘See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil’? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining and Petroleum EngineeringUniversidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations