Advertisement

Integration of Electrofacies and Hydraulic Flow Units to Delineate Reservoir Quality in Uncored Reservoirs: A Case Study, Nubia Sandstone Reservoir, Gulf of Suez, Egypt

  • Mohamed S. El Sharawy
  • Bassem S. NabawyEmail author
Original Paper
  • 84 Downloads

Abstract

Recognition of reservoir quality is an important objective in reservoir characterization process. By definition, the quality of a reservoir is described by its hydrocarbon storage capacity and deliverability. The storage capacity is a function of porosity, whereas deliverability is a function of permeability. Thus, both porosity and permeability are the main reservoir quality controlling factors. Five wells were selected to study the reservoir quality of the Nubia sandstone in the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. The Nubia interval, deposited in continental to shallow marine conditions, consists mainly of sandstone intercalated by thin layers of shale. Three wells were partially cored and the other two wells are completely uncored. Based on several complementary techniques, it is concluded that the Nubia sandstone is of moderate to extremely heterogeneous quality. The porosity–permeability cross-plot showed fair-to-medium relationship, indicating the significant role of diagenetic agents. The Nubia reservoir quality has been enhanced principally by fracturing, dissolution and leaching. However, the reservoir quality decreased by cementation, compaction and filling of pore spaces by kaolinite. Based on principal component and cluster analyses, six electrofacies are recognized within the Nubia interval. Three electrofacies are dominant, whereas the other three are subsidiary. Flow zone indicator (FZI) was determined based on mean hydraulic radius and normalized porosity. Correlation between electrofacies and FZI permits discriminating the subject formation into reservoir quality ranks. The relative complexity of this reference formation notwithstanding, because of the robustness of the resulting electrofacies–FZI correlations, it was relatively straightforward to recognize and reasonably predict the reservoir quality of the uncored intervals.

Keywords

Nubia sandstone Electrofacies Reservoir quality Porosity Permeability 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their significant comments that helped us improve and reconstruct the manuscript. Special thanks are also due to the Editor Prof. Dr. John Carranza, whose patience and insightful suggestions have led to a concise revised version. The authors are grateful to the Egyptian General Petroleum Corporation and the Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company for releasing the data.

References

  1. Abbaszadeh, M., Fujii, H., & Fujimoto, F. (1996). Permeability prediction by hydraulic flow units—theory and applications. SPE Formation Evaluation, 11(4), 263–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdel-Wahab, A. A. (1992). Provenance of Gebel El Zeit sandstones, Gulf of Suez. Egypt. Sedimentary Geology, 75, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdel-Wahab, A. A., Allam, A., Kholief, M. M., & Salem, A. M. (1992). Sedimentological and paleoenvironmental studies on Gebel El-Zeit, Gulf of Suez. Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 14, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abed, A. A. (2014). Hydraulic flow units and permeability prediction in a carbonate reservoir, Southern Iraq from well log data using non-parametric correlation. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Science Technology & Engineering, 3(1), 480–486.Google Scholar
  5. Al-Dhafeeri, A. M., & Nasr-El-Din, H. A. (2007). Characteristics of high-permeability zones using core analysis, and production logging data. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 55, 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allam, A. (1988). A lithostratigraphical and structural study on Gebel El-Zeit area. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 7, 933–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alsharhan, A., & Salah, M. (1997). Lithostratigraphy, sedimentology and hydrocarbon habitat of the Pre-Cenomanian Nubian sandstone in the Gulf of Suez oil Province. Egypt. GeoArabia, 2(4), 385–400.Google Scholar
  8. Amaefule, J., Altunbay, M., Tiab, D., Kersey, D., & Keelan, D. (1993). Enhanced reservoir description using core and log data to identify hydraulic flow units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/wells. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 26436, 205–220.Google Scholar
  9. Byrnes, A. P., (1994). Prediction of Permeability and Capillary Pressure. In Wilson, M. D. (Ed), Reservoir quality assessment and prediction in clastic rocks. SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology 30: 349-355.Google Scholar
  10. Corbett, P. W. M., & Potter, D. K. (2004). Petrotyping: A base map and atlas for navigating through permeability and porosity data for reservoir comparison and permeability prediction. In International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts.Google Scholar
  11. Doveton, J. H. (1994). Geologic log analysis using computer methods. Computer applications in geology (2nd ed.). Tulsa: AAPG.Google Scholar
  12. Doveton, J. H. (2014). Principles of mathematical petrophysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dykstra, H., & Parsons, R. L. (1950). The prediction of oil recovery by waterflooding. Secondary Recovery of Oil in the United States (2nd ed., pp. 160–174). Washington, DC: API.Google Scholar
  14. El Sharawy, M. S. (2001). Geology and tectonic of Younis and Nessim oilfields, Gulf of Suez. Mansoura: Mansoura University.Google Scholar
  15. El Sharawy, M. S. (2006). Seismic and well log data as an aid for evaluating oil and gas reservoirs in the southern part of the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. In Ph.D. dissertation. Mansoura University, Egypt.Google Scholar
  16. El Sharawy, M. S., & Nabawy, B. S. (2016a). Geological and petrophysical characterization of the lower Senonian Matulla formation in Southern and Central Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 41(1), 281–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. El Sharawy, M. S., & Nabawy, B. S. (2016b). Determination of electrofacies using wireline logs based on multivariate statistical analysis for the Kareem Formation, Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Environmental Earth Sciences, 75(21), 1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. El Sharawy, M. S., & Nabawy, B. S. (2018). Determining the porosity exponent m and lithology factor a for sandstones and their control by overburden pressure: A case study from the Gulf of Suez. Egypt. AAPG Bulletin, 102(9), 1893–1910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elphick, R., & Moore, R. (1999). Permeability calculations from clustered electrofacies, a case study in Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela. In: 40th SPWLA annual symposium, Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  20. El Heiny I., Enani, N., & Abdou, I. (1998). Structural and stratigraphic interpretation of a new Nubian sandstone oil reservoir, Gulf of Suez, Egypt. In 14th EGPC Exploration and Production Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 466–491).Google Scholar
  21. Gameel, M., & Darwish, M. (1994). Reservoir behavior of the Pre- Turonian sandstones in south Gulf of Suez province (Sidki field—case history). In 12th EGPC Exploration and Production Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 449–471).Google Scholar
  22. Guo, G., Diaz, M. A., Paz, F. J., Smalley, J., & Waninger, E. A. (2007). Rock typing as an effective tool for permeability and water-saturation modeling: A case study in a clastic reservoir in the Oriente basin. Society of Petroleum Engineers Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 10(6), 730–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hermina, M., Klitzsch, E., & List, F. R. (1989). Stratigraphic Lexicon and Explanatory Notes to the Geological Map of Egypt 1: 500 000. Cairo: Conoco Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Issawi, B., El-Hinnawi, N., Khawaga, L., Labib, S., & Anani, N. (1981). Contributions to the geology of Wadi Feiran area, Sinai (p. 48). Petrobel internal Report: Egypt.Google Scholar
  25. Kassab, M. A. M., Abu Hashish, M., Nabawy, B. S., & El-Nagar, O. (2017). Effect of the kaolinite content on porosity, permeability and capillary pressure derived parameters, Nubia sandstone, Wadi Kareem, Eastern Desert. Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 125, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klitzsch, E., & Squyres, C. H. (1990). Paleozoic and Mesozoic geologic history of northeastern Africa based upon new interpretation of Nubia strata. AAPG Bulletin, 74, 1203–1211.Google Scholar
  27. Kolodzie, Jr. S. (1980). Analysis of pore throat size and use of the Waxman-Smits equation to determine OOIP in Spindle field, Colorado: Society of Petroleum Engineers. In 55th Annual Fall Technical Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers Paper No. 9382, 10.Google Scholar
  28. Kora, M. (1984). The Palaeozoic outcrops of Um-Bogma area, Sinai, Egypt. In Ph.D. Thesis, Mansoura University, Mansoura.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, S.H., & Datta-Gupta, A. (1999). Electrofacies characterization and permeability predictions in carbonate reservoirs: role of multivariate analysis and non-parametric regression. Society of Petroleum Engineers -56658-MS, 13.Google Scholar
  30. Morris, R.L., & Biggs, W.P. (1967). Using log-derived values of water saturation and porosity: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts Annual Logging Symposium 26.Google Scholar
  31. Moss, B. (1997). The partitioning of petrophysical data: a review. In H. Lovell (Ed.), Developments in petrophysics (Vol. 122, pp. 181–252). London: Geological Society Special Publication.Google Scholar
  32. Nabawy, B. S. (2014). Estimating porosity and permeability using digital image analysis (DIA) technique for highly porous sandstones. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(3), 889–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nabawy, B. S. (2015). Impacts of the pore- and petro-fabrics on porosity exponent and lithology factor of Archie’s equation for carbonate rocks. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 108, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nabawy, B. S., & Al-Azazi, N. A. S. (2015). Reservoir zonation and discrimination using the routine core analyses data: the upper Jurassic Sab’atayn sandstones as a case study, Sab’atayn basin, Yemen. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(8), 5511–5530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nabawy, B. S., & Barakat, M. Kh. (2017). Formation Evaluation using conventional and special core analyses: Belayim formation as a case study, Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10(25), 1–23.Google Scholar
  36. Nabawy, B. S., Basal, A. M. K., Sarhan, M. A., & Safa, M. G. (2018). Reservoir zonation, rock typing and compartmentalization of the Tortonian-Serravallian sequence, Temsah Gas Field, offshore Nile Delta. Egypt. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 92, 609–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nabawy, B. S., & David, Ch. (2016). X-Ray CT scanning imaging for the Nubia sandstones: A macro scale tool for characterizing fluid transport. Geosciences Journal, 20(5), 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nabawy, B. S., & ElHariri, T. Y. M. (2008). Electric fabric of cretaceous clastic rocks in Abu Gharadig basin, Western Desert, Egypt. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 52(1), 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nabawy, B. S., & Géraud, Y. (2016). Impacts of pore- and petro-fabrics, mineral composition and diagenetic history on the bulk thermal conductivity of sandstones. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 115, 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nabawy, B. S., Rochette, P., & Géraud, Y. (2009). Petrophysical and magnetic pore network anisotropy of some cretaceous sandstone from Tushka Basin. Egypt, Geophysical Journal International, 177(1), 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nabawy, B. S., Rochette, P., & Géraud, Y. (2010). Electric pore fabric of the Nubia sandstones in south Egypt: characterization and modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 183, 681–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nabawy, B. S., Sediek, K. N., & Nafee, S. A. (2015). Pore fabric assignment using electrical conductivity of some Albian-Cenomanian sequences in north Eastern Desert. Egypt. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8(8), 5601–5615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nabway, B. S., & Kassab, M. A. (2014). Porosity-reducing and porosity-enhancing diagenetic factors for some carbonate microfacies: A guide for petrophysical facies discrimination. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7(11), 4523–4539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noweir, A.M., Abdel-Hameed, A.M., & Salem, A. (2000). On the Petrology of Paleozoic-Mesozoic Nubian (Nuba) type sandstones in Egypt. In: Soliman, S.M. (Ed.), Sedimentary Geology of Egypt, Applications and Economics.Google Scholar
  45. Patton, T., Moustafa, A., Nelson, R., & Abdine, A. (1994). Tectonic evolution and structural setting of the Suez rift. In: Landon SM (ed) Interior rift basin. AAPG Memoir 59, 9–55.Google Scholar
  46. Perez, H. H., Datta-Gupta, A., & Mishra, S. (2005). The role of electrofacies, lithofacies, and hydraulic flow units in permeability predictions from well logs: a comparative analysis using classification trees. Society of Petroleum Engineers-84301-PA 13.Google Scholar
  47. Pittman, E. D. (1992). Relationship of porosity and permeability to various parameters derived from mercury injection capillary pressure curves for sandstone. AAPG Bulletin, 76, 191–198.Google Scholar
  48. Pittman, E. D. (2001). Estimating pore throat size in sandstones from routine core-analysis data: Search and Discovery Article 40009. http://www.searchanddiscovery.net/documents/pittman/index.htm.
  49. Said, R. (1971). Explanatory note to accompany the geological map of Egypt. Geological Survey of Egypt, 56, 123.Google Scholar
  50. Schowalter, T. T. (1979). Mechanics of secondary hydrocarbon migration and entrapment. AAPG Bulletin, 63(5), 723–760.Google Scholar
  51. Serra, O. (1988). Fundamentals of well-log interpretation: the acquisition of logging data.Google Scholar
  52. Serra, O., & Abbott, H. T. (1980). The contribution of logging data to sedimentology and stratigraphy, Society of Petroleum Engineers 9270-PA 19, Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc.Google Scholar
  53. Shenawi, S. H., White, J. P., Elrafie, E. A., & Kilany, K. A. (2007). Permeability and water saturation distribution by lithologic facies and hydraulic units: A Reservoir Simulation Case Study: Society of Petroleum Engineers Paper no.105273. In 15th Society of Petroleum Engineers Middle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Kingdom of Bahrain.Google Scholar
  54. Spearing, M., Allen, T., & McAulay, G. (2001). Review of the Winland R35 method for net pay definition and its application in low permeability sands. In International Symposium Proceedings, Society of Core Analysts Paper No. 63, 5.Google Scholar
  55. Stinco, L. P. (2006). Core and log data integration; the key for determining electrofacies. In SPWLA 47th Annual Logging Symposium 7.Google Scholar
  56. Stinco, L., Elphick, R., & Moore, W. (2001). Electrofacies and production prediction index determination in El Tordillo Field, San Jorge Basin, Argentina. In: 42nd society of professional well log analyst annual symposium, Houston.Google Scholar
  57. Teh, W. J., Willhite, G. P., & Doveton, J. H. (2012). Improved reservoir characterization using petrophysical classifiers within electrofacies. Society of Petroleum Engineers 154341-PP 19.Google Scholar
  58. Tiab, D., & Donaldson, E. C. (1996). Petrophysics. Theory and Practice of Measuring Reservoir Rock and Fluid Transport Properties. Houston: Gulf Publishing.Google Scholar
  59. Winland, H. D. (1972). Oil accumulation in response to pore size changes, Weyburn field, Saskatchewan. Amaco Production Research Report No. F72-G-25.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geophysical Sciences DepartmentNational Research CentreGizaEgypt

Personalised recommendations