Advertisement

Water Footprint Assessment for Coal-to-Gas in China

  • Jianliang WangEmail author
  • Xiaojie Liu
  • Xu Geng
  • Yongmei Bentley
  • Chunhua Zhang
  • Yuru Yang
Original Paper
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

To increase its domestic gas production and achieve cleaner end-use utilization of its coal resources, China is actively promoting its coal-to-gas (CTG) industry. However, one of the major concerns for CTG development is the consequent significant water usage. To better understand this aspect, this paper presents a quantitative assessment of the water footprint (WF) for China’s CTG industry. The results show that the WF of CTG in China is typically in the region of 0.055 m3 water per cubic meter of produced gas. In addition, the analysis of the components of this WF indicates that most of the water resources are used both in the process of CTG production itself, and also in the dilute discharge of pollutants. In terms of the planned production capacity of China’s CTG projects, this paper finds that the water use in some regions of Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, Shanxi and Liaoning may account 30–40% of regional water resources, which means the large-scale development of CTG projects may present significant risks to regional water resources. Therefore, this paper suggests that the status of regional water availability should be one of the key factors considered by policy makers in order to achieve sustainable development of the country’s CTG industry.

Keywords

Coal-to-gas Water footprint Water resources China 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study has been supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 71874201, 71673297, 71503264 and 71874202) and the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 15YJC630121). We also appreciate receiving the helpful comments from anonymous reviewers of this paper, Dr Roger Bentley of the Petroleum Analysis Centre, Ireland, and Dr. Xinqiang Wei of Economics & Technology Research Institute, CNPC, Beijing, China.

References

  1. Allan, C., Xia, J., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2013). Climate change and water security: Challenges for adaptive water management. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(6), 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger, M., Warsen, J., Krinke, S., Bach, V., & Finkbeiner, M. (2012). Water footprint of European cars: Potential impacts of water consumption along automobile life cycles. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(7), 4091–4099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai, D. F., Wang, L., Xu, J., & Wang, Z. Z. (2011). Present status and analysis on coal gasification technology for SNG. Clean Coal Technology, 17(5), 44–47.Google Scholar
  4. Chandel, M., & Williams, E. (2009). Synthetic natural gas (SNG): Technology, environmental implications, and economics, January 2009. https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/sites/default/files/publications/natgas-paper.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2018.
  5. Chapagain, A. K., Hoekstra, A. Y., Savenije, H. H. G., & Gautam, R. (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 186–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, P. C., Chiu, H. M., Chyou, Y. P., & Svoboda, K. (2016). Warm syngas clean-up processes applied in synthetic natural gas (SNG) production with coal and biomass. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 52, 469–474.Google Scholar
  7. China Electricity Council (CEC). (2016). China electric power industry annual development report. http://www.cec.org.cn/guihuayutongji/gongzuodongtai/2016-08-24/157409.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2018.
  8. Chiu, Y. W., & Wu, M. (2012). Assessing county-level water footprints of different cellulosic-biofuel feedstock pathways. Environmental Science and Technology, 46(16), 9155–9162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornot-Gandolphe, S. (2014). China’s coal market: Can Beijing Tame ‘King Coal’?. Oxford: The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding, Y., Han, W., Chai, Q., Yang, S., & Shen, W. (2013). Coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG): A solution to China’s energy security and CO2 reduction? Energy Policy, 55, 445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding, N., Lu, X. H., Yang, J. X., & Bin, L. (2016). Water footprint of coal production. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 36, 4228–4233.Google Scholar
  12. Feng, K., Hubacek, K., Siu, Y. L., & Li, X. (2014). The energy and water nexus in Chinese electricity production: A hybrid life cycle analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39, 342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedrichs, J. (2011). Peak energy and climate change: The double bind of post-normal science. Futures, 43(4), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu, G. Z., & Chen, C. (2010). NG demand and supply in China and economic and technical analysis of coal gasification technology. Sino-Global Energy, 15(6), 28–34.Google Scholar
  15. Gao, J., Zhao, P., Zhang, H., Mao, G., & Wang, Y. (2018). Operational water withdrawal and consumption factors for electricity generation technology in china—A literature review. Sustainability, 10(4), 1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerbens-Leenes, P. W., Hoekstra, A. Y., & van der Meer, T. H. (2009). The water footprint of bioenergy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(25), 10219–10223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gu, Y., Xu, J., Keller, A. A., Yuan, D., Li, Y., Zhang, B., et al. (2015). Calculation of water footprint of the iron and steel industry: A case study in eastern china. Journal of Cleaner Production, 92, 274–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Han, Y., Wang, A., & Zhou, F. (2017). Should china continue developing the coal-based synthetic natural gas? Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 12(6), 1–8.Google Scholar
  19. Hoekstra, A. Y. (2002). Virtual water trade. In Proceedings of the international expert meeting on virtual water trade. IHE Delft, The Netherlands, December 13–23, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2011). The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard. London and Washington: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  21. Huo, J., Yang, D., Xia, F., Tang, H., & Zhang, W. (2013). Feasibility analysis and policy recommendations for the development of the coal based SNG industry in Xinjiang. Energy Policy, 61, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hussey, K., & Pittock, J. (2012). The energy-water nexus: Managing the links between energy and water for a sustainable future. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2017). World Energy Outlook 2017. https://www.iea.org/weo2017/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.
  25. Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M., & Matthews, H. S. (2007). Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. Environmental Science and Technology, 41(17), 6290–6296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jia, X., Li, Z., Wang, F., Foo, D. C. Y., & Tan, R. R. (2016). Multi-dimensional pinch analysis for sustainable power generation sector planning in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2756–2771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jin, Y., Tang, X., Feng, C., & Höök, M. (2017). Energy and water conservation synergy in China: 2007–2012. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kong, Z., Dong, X., & Liu, G. (2016). Coal-based synthetic natural gas vs. imported natural gas in China: A net energy perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 690–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kopyscinski, J., Schildhauer, T. J., & Biollaz, S. M. (2010). Production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from coal and dry biomass—A technology review from 1950 to 2009. Fuel, 89(8), 1763–1783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krawczyk, P., Howaniec, N., & Smoliński, A. (2016). Economic efficiency analysis of substitute natural gas (SNG) production in steam gasification of coal with the utilization of HTR excess heat. Energy, 114, 1207–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li, S., Ji, X., Zhang, X., Gao, L., & Jin, H. (2014a). Coal to SNG: Technical progress, modeling and system optimization through exergy analysis. Applied Energy, 136, 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Li, S., Jin, H., & Gao, L. (2013). Cogeneration of substitute natural gas and power from coal by moderate recycle of the chemical unconverted gas. Energy, 55, 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, H., Yang, S., Zhang, J., Kraslawski, A., & Qian, Y. (2014b). Analysis of rationality of coal-based synthetic natural gas (SNG) production in China. Energy Policy, 71, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu, J., Cui, D., Yao, C., Yu, J., Su, F., & Xu, G. (2016). Syngas methanation in fluidized bed for an advanced two-stage process of SNG production. Fuel Processing Technology, 141, 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luo, Z. X., & Zhang, L. M. (2013). China’s CTG industry enters a new development era. China Petroleum and Chemical Industry, 1, 24–25.Google Scholar
  36. Ma, J., & Peng, J. (2013). Research progress on water footprint. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33, 5458–5466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maggio, G., & Cacciola, G. (2012). When will oil, natural gas, and coal peak? Fuel, 98, 111–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Man, Y., Han, Y., Hu, Y., Yang, S., & Yang, S. (2018). Synthetic natural gas as an alternative to coal for power generation in China: Life cycle analysis of haze pollution, greenhouse gas emission, and resource consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2503–2512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mangmeechai, A., & Pavasant, P. (2013). Water footprints of Cassava- and Molasses-based ethanol production in Thailand. Natural Resources Research, 22(4), 273–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(5), 1577–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mielke, E., Anadon, L. D., & Narayanamurti, V. (2010). Water consumption of energy resource extraction, processing, and conversion. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School.Google Scholar
  42. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (MEP). (1996). Integrated wastewater discharge standard (GB8978-1996).Google Scholar
  43. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (MEP). (2002). Environmental quality standards for surface water (GB3838-2002).Google Scholar
  44. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (MEP). (2006). Emission standard for pollutants from coal industry (GB20426-2006).Google Scholar
  45. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (MEP). (2008). Cleaner production standard: Coal mining and processing industry (HG446-2008).Google Scholar
  46. Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (MEP). (2017). 2015 annual statistic report on environment in China. http://www.zhb.gov.cn/gzfw_13107/hjtj/hjtjnb/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018.
  47. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China (MHURD). (2010). Sewage discharged into urban sewage water quality standards (CJ343-2010).Google Scholar
  48. Mohr, S. H., Wang, J., Ellem, G., Ward, J., & Giurco, D. (2015). Projection of world fossil fuels by country. Fuel, 141, 120–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC). (2017). China statistical yearbook 2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  50. Qian, W., Huang, Y. Y., Zhang, Q. W., Du, M. H., & Xie, Q. (2011). Development of synthetic technique of substitute natural gas (SNG) from coal. Clean Coal Technology, 17(1), 27–32.Google Scholar
  51. Qin, Y., Wagner, F., Scovronick, N., Peng, W., Yang, J., Zhu, T., et al. (2017). Air quality, health, and climate implications of China’s synthetic natural gas development. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 201703167.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703167114.
  52. Razzaq, R., Li, C., Usman, M., Suzuki, K., & Zhang, S. (2015). A highly active and stable Co4N/γ-Al2O3 catalyst for CO and CO2 methanation to produce synthetic natural gas (SNG). Chemical Engineering Journal, 262, 1090–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rulli, M. C., Bellomi, D., Cazzoli, A., De Carolis, G., & D’Odorico, P. (2016). The water–land–food nexus of first-generation biofuels. Scientific Reports, 6, 22521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smajgl, A., Ward, J., & Pluschke, L. (2016). The water–food–energy nexus—Realising a new paradigm. Journal of Hydrology, 533, 533–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Spang, E. S., Moomaw, W. R., Gallagher, K. S., Kirshen, P. H., & Marks, D. H. (2014). The water consumption of energy production: An international comparison. Environmental Research Letters, 9(10), 105002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tidwell, V., & Moreland, B. (2016). Mapping water consumption for energy production around the Pacific Rim. Environmental Research Letters, 11(9), 094008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vidic, R. D., Brantley, S. L., Vandenbossche, J. M., Yoxtheimer, D., & Abad, J. D. (2013). Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science, 340(6134), 1235009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang, J., Feng, L., Tang, X., Bentley, Y., & Höök, M. (2017a). The implications of fossil fuel supply constraints on climate change projections: A supply-side analysis. Futures, 86, 58–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang, J. L., Liu, M. M., Bentley, Y. M., Feng, L. Y., & Zhang, C. H. (2018). Water use for shale gas extraction in the Sichuan Basin, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 226, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang, J. L., Liu, M. M., McLellan, B. C., & Tang, X. (2017b). Environmental impacts of shale gas development in China: A hybrid life cycle analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 120, 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang, F. C., Yu, G. S., Gong, X., Liu, H. F., Wang, Y. F., & Liang, Q. F. (2009). Research and development of large-scale coal gasification technology. Chemical Industry & Engineering Progress, 2, 173–180.Google Scholar
  62. Wei, S., & Shi, L. (2015). The coal-oil industrial layout evaluation based on water footprint theory. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 35(12), 4203–4214.Google Scholar
  63. Williams, E. D., & Simmons, J. E. (2013). Water in the energy industry. An introduction. www.bp.com/energysustainabilitychallenge. Accessed 6 Mar 2018.
  64. Wilson, W., Leipzig, T., & Griffiths-Sattenspiel, B. (2012). Burning our rivers: The water footprint of electricity, river network. Comptroller of Public Accounts, Data Division Services, Austin, TX. Publication, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  65. Xie, K., Li, W., & Zhao, W. (2010). Coal chemical industry and its sustainable development in China. Energy, 35(11), 4349–4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Yang, C. J. (2017). Coal chemicals: China’s high-carbon clean coal programme? Climate Policy, 17(4), 470–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yang, S. B., & Han, M. L. (2011). Analysis of water resources and water conservation and emission reduction techniques in thermal power generation. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press.Google Scholar
  68. Yang, C. J., & Jackson, R. B. (2013). China’s synthetic natural gas revolution. Nature Climate Change, 3(10), 852–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yang, S., Qian, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., & Yang, S. (2017). Modeling, simulation, and techno-economic analysis of Lurgi gasification and BGL gasification for coal-to-SNG. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 117, 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yi, Q., Wu, G. S., Gong, M. H., Huang, Y., Feng, J., Hao, Y. H., et al. (2017). A feasibility study for CO2, recycle assistance with coke oven gas to synthetic natural gas. Applied Energy, 193, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhang, J., Jiang, H., Liu, G., & Zeng, W. H. (2018). A study on the contribution of industrial restructuring to reduction of carbon emissions in China during the five Five-Year Plan periods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 629–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementChina University of PetroleumBeijingChina
  2. 2.Research Center for China’s Oil and Gas Industry DevelopmentBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institutes of Science and DevelopmentChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Business SchoolUniversity of BedfordshireBedfordUK
  5. 5.Economics and Technology Research Institute, CNPCBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations