Advertisement

Risk-Based Analysis in Mineral Potential Mapping: Application of Quantifier-Guided Ordered Weighted Averaging Method

  • Gholam-Reza Elyasi
  • Abbas Bahroudi
  • Maysam Abedi
Original Paper
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, a quantifier-guided ordered weighted averaging (OWA) method was employed for mineral potential mapping (MPM) in Nowchun Cu–Mo prospect, SE Iran. The proposed knowledge-driven method has the capability of incorporating the geologists’ preference (weight) and attitude toward risk analysis during MPM. Since quantitative determination of OWA parameters is a tough task, employing linguistic quantifiers aid geologists to simply define their desired strategy for MPM. To implement the method, eight weighted criteria spatially associated with mineralization were derived from geological, geochemical and geophysical datasets. The evidential layer integration was implemented using various OWA operators, which is generated by employing seven linguistic quantifiers. As a result, seven mineral potential maps, which report favorability index from 0 to 1, were produced in a spectrum range of risk from extremely optimistic to extremely pessimistic. According to results, the western and southeastern part of the study area were detected as regions with the lowest and highest mineral favorability. For validation, the results of subsequent geological field works and 106 drilled boreholes were taken into account. The evaluation indicated that the mineral potential map based on the “Some” quantifier has the highest correspondence with underground 3D mineralization zones of Cu and Mo. The mineral potential map based on the “Some” quantifier delineated two main prospective zones in the eastern and central-north parts of the study area. The former zone was recently investigated by drilling, but the latter zone was proposed for new drilling operation. Applying the proposed method in each scale of target delineation (a) generates various continuum favorability maps; (b) reveals mineralization patterns in the study area; and (c) provides an opportunity in exploration to select the optimal mineral potential map for detailed exploration tasks regarding the geologists’ attitudes toward risk and project budget.

Keywords

Quantifier-guided OWA MPM Knowledge-driven Nowchun prospect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Departments of Mining Engineering, University of Tehran. We also express our sincere thanks to the National Iranian Copper Industries Company (NICICo) for providing required data. We express our deep gratitude to the all geologists and exploration experts that cooperated for criteria recognition and weights assignment of this analysis. Finally, we thank Prof. Emmanuel John M. Carranza and two reviewers for reading the paper precisely and patiently and for their constructive and valuable comments, which indeed helped us to improve the quality of our work.

References

  1. Abedi, M., Mohammadi, R., Norouzi, G. H., & Mir Mohammadi, M. S. (2016). A comprehensive VIKOR method for integration of various exploratory data in mineral potential mapping. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 9, 482.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-016-2512-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abedi, M., & Norouzi, G. H. (2016). A general framework of TOPSIS method for integration of airborne geophysics, satellite imagery, geochemical and geological data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 46, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abedi, M., Norouzi, G. H., & Bahroudi, A. (2012a). Support vector machine for multi-classification of mineral prospectivity areas. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 272–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Abedi, M., Norouzi, G. H., & Fathianpour, N. (2015). Mineral potential mapping in Central Iran using fuzzy ordered weighted averaging method. Geophysical Prospecting, 63, 461–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Abedi, M., Norouzi, G. H., & Torabi, S. A. (2013). Clustering of mineral prospectivity area as an unsupervised classification approach to explore copper deposit. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6, 3601–3613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Abedi, M., Torabi, S. A., Norouzi, G. H., Hamzeh, M., & Elyasi, G. R. (2012b). PROMETHEE II: A knowledge-driven method for copper exploration. Computers & Geosciences, 46, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonham-Carter, G. F. (1994). Geographic information systems for geoscientists-modeling with GIS. Computer Methods in the Geoscientists, 13, 398.Google Scholar
  8. Boroushaki, S., & Malczewski, J. (2008). Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Computers & Geosciences, 34, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boroushaki, S., & Malczewski, J. (2010). Using the fuzzy majority approach for GIS-based multicriteria group decision-making. Computers & Geosciences, 36, 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calijuri, M. L., Marques, E. T., Lorentz, J. F., Azevedo, R. F., & Carvalho, C. A. (2004). Multi-criteria analysis for the identification of waste disposal areas. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 22, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carranza, E. J. M. (2008). Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  12. Carranza, E. J. M. (2010). Improved wildcat modelling of mineral prospectivity. Resource Geology, 60, 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carranza, E. J. M. (2011). Geocomputation of mineral exploration targets. Computers & Geosciences, 37, 1907–1916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carranza, E. J. M. (2012). Primary geochemical characteristics of mineral deposits: Implications for exploration. Ore Geology Reviews, 45, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carranza, E. J. M. (2015). Data-driven evidential belief modeling of mineral potential using few prospects and evidence with missing values. Natural Resources Research, 24, 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carranza, E. J. M., & Laborte, A. G. (2016). Data-driven predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity using random forests: A case study in Catanduanes Island (Philippines). Natural Resources Research, 25, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carranza, E. J. M., Sadeghi, M., & Billay, A. (2015). Predictive mapping of prospectivity for orogenic gold, Giyani greenstone belt (South Africa). Ore Geology Reviews, 71, 703–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, J., Zhang, X., & Zhu, Q. (2011). Multi-objective decision making for land use planning with ordered weighted averaging method. Systems Engineering Procedia, 2, 434–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2010). Application of GIS-based OWA method to suitability evaluation of construction land in Tangshan city. In 12th Biennial International Conference on Engineering, Construction, and Operations in Challenging Environments; and Fourth NASA/ARO/ASCE Workshop on Granular Materials in Lunar and Martian Exploration, March 14–17, 2010. Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
  20. Cheng, Q., & Agterberg, F. (1999). Fuzzy weights of evidence method and its application in mineral potential mapping. Natural Resources Research, 8, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheng, Q., & Zhao, P. (2011). Singularity theories and methods for characterizing mineralization processes and mapping geo-anomalies for mineral deposit prediction. Geoscience Frontiers, 2, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Costa e Silva, E., Silva, A. M., Toledo, C. L. B., Mol, A. G., Otterman, D. W., & De Souza, S. R. C. (2012). Mineral potential mapping for orogenic gold deposits in the Rio Maria granite greenstone terrane, Southeastern Pará State, Brazil. Economic Geology, 107, 1387–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Araujo, C. C., & Macedo, A. B. (2002). Multicriteria geologic data analysis for mineral favorability mapping: Application to a metal sulphide mineralized area, Ribeira Valley Metallogenic Province, Brazil. Natural Resources Research, 11, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De Quadros, T. F., Koppe, J. C., Strieder, A. J., & Costa, J. F. (2006). Mineral-potential mapping: A comparison of weights-of-evidence and fuzzy methods. Natural Resources Research, 15, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Drobne, S., & Lisec, A. (2009). Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: Weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica, 33, 459–474.Google Scholar
  26. Eastman, J. (1999). Multi-criteria evaluation and GIS. Geographical information systems, 1, 493–502.Google Scholar
  27. Eldrandaly, K. (2013). Developing a GIS-based MCE site selection tool in ArcGIS using COM technology. International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 10, 276–282.Google Scholar
  28. Elyasi, G. (2009). Mineral potential mapping in detailed stage using GIS in one of exploration prospects of Kerman Province. Master of Science Thesis, University of Tehran (published in Persian).Google Scholar
  29. Ferretti, V., & Pomarico, S. (2013). Ecological land suitability analysis through spatial indicators: An application of the analytic network process technique and ordered weighted average approach. Ecological Indicators, 34, 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ford, A., & Hart, C. J. (2013). Mineral potential mapping in frontier regions: A Mongolian case study. Ore Geology Reviews, 51, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fuller, R. (1996). OWA operators in decision making. Exploring the Limits of Support Systems, 3, 85–104.Google Scholar
  32. Gbanie, S. P., Tengbe, P. B., Momoh, J. S., Medo, J., & Kabba, V. T. S. (2013). Modelling landfill location using geographic information systems (GIS) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): Case study Bo, Southern Sierra Leone. Applied Geography, 36, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gorsevski, P. V., Donevska, K. R., Mitrovski, C. D., & Frizado, J. P. (2012). Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: A case study using ordered weighted average. Waste Management, 32, 287–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris, J., Grunsky, E., Behnia, P., & Corrigan, D. (2015). Data-and knowledge-driven mineral prospectivity maps for Canada’s North. Ore Geology Reviews, 71, 788–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harris, J., Wilkinson, L., Heather, K., Fumerton, S., Bernier, M., Ayer, J., et al. (2001). Application of GIS processing techniques for producing mineral prospectivity maps—A case study: Mesothermal Au in the Swayze Greenstone Belt, Ontario, Canada. Natural Resources Research, 10, 91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hezarkhani, A. (2009). Hydrothermal fluid geochemistry at the Chah-Firuzeh porphyry copper deposit, Iran: Evidence from fluid inclusions. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 101, 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hogson, C. (1990). Uses (and abuses) of ore deposit models in mineral exploration. Geoscience Canada, 17, 79–89.Google Scholar
  38. Hossaini, S. A., & Abedi, M. (2015). Data envelopment analysis: A knowledge-driven method for mineral prospectivity mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 82, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ibrahim, A. M., Bennett, B., & Isiaka, F. (2015). The optimisation of Bayesian classifier in predictive spatial modelling for secondary mineral deposits. Procedia Computer Science, 61, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Iyer, V., Fung, C. C., Brown, W., & Wong, K. W. (2005). Neural network ensembles based approach for mineral prospectivity prediction. In TENCON 2005 2005 IEEE Region 10. IEEE, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
  41. Jiang, H., & Eastman, J. R. (2000). Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision with multiple objectives. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, S., Oh, H. J., Heo, C. H., & Park, I. (2014). A case study for the integration of predictive mineral potential maps. Open Geosciences, 6, 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leite, E. P., & De Souza Filho, C. R. (2009). Artificial neural networks applied to mineral potential mapping for copper-gold mineralizations in the Carajás Mineral Province, Brazil. Geophysical Prospecting, 57, 1049–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu, Y., Cheng, Q., Xia, Q., & Wang, X. (2014). Mineral potential mapping for tungsten polymetallic deposits in the Nanling metallogenic belt, South China. Journal of Earth Science, 25, 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu, Y., Cheng, Q., Xia, Q., & Wang, X. (2015). The use of evidential belief functions for mineral potential mapping in the Nanling belt, South China. Frontiers of Earth Science, 9, 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luo, J. (1990). Statistical mineral prediction without defining a training area. Mathematical Geology, 22, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luo, X., & Dimitrakopoulos, R. (2003). Data-driven fuzzy analysis in quantitative mineral resource assessment. Computers & Geosciences, 29, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Magalhaes, L. A., & Souza Filho, C. R. (2012). Targeting of gold deposits in Amazonian exploration frontiers using knowledge-and data-driven spatial modeling of geophysical, geochemical, and geological data. Surveys In Geophysics, 33, 211–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Makropoulos, C., & Butler, D. (2006). Spatial ordered weighted averaging: Incorporating spatially variable attitude towards risk in spatial multi-criteria decision-making. Environmental Modelling and Software, 21, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Malczewski, J. (2006a). Integrating multicriteria analysis and geographic information systems: The ordered weighted averaging (OWA) approach. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 6, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Malczewski, J. (2006b). Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 8, 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Malczewski, J., & Liu, X. (2014). Local ordered weighted averaging in GIS-based multicriteria analysis. Annals of GIS, 20, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2005). Exploring multicriteria decision strategies in GIS with linguistic quantifiers: A case study of residential quality evaluation. Journal of Geographical Systems, 7, 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mellers, B. A., & Chang, S. J. (1994). Representations of risk judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meng, Y., Malczewski, J., & Boroushaki, S. (2011). A GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis approach for mapping accessibility patterns of housing development sites: A case study in Canmore, Alberta. Journal of Geographic Information System, 3, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Merigo, J. M., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2011). Decision-making in sport management based on the OWA operator. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 10408–10413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nykänen, V., Groves, D. I., Ojala, V. J., Eilu, P., & Gardoll, S. J. (2008). Reconnaissance-scale conceptual fuzzy-logic prospectivity modelling for iron oxide copper–gold deposits in the northern Fennoscandian Shield, Finland. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 55, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oh, H. J., & Lee, S. (2010). Application of artificial neural network for gold–silver deposits potential mapping: A case study of Korea. Natural Resources Research, 19, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pazand, K., Hezarkhani, A., & Ataei, M. (2012). Using TOPSIS approaches for predictive porphyry Cu potential mapping: A case study in Ahar–Arasbaran area (NW, Iran). Computers & Geosciences, 49, 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pazand, K., Hezarkhani, A., & Pazand, K. (2013). Predictive mapping for porphyry copper mineralization: A comparison of knowledge-driven and data-driven fuzzy models in Siahrud area, Azarbaijan province, NW Iran. Applied Geomatics, 5, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Porwal, A., Carranza, E. J. M., & Hale, M. (2004). A hybrid neuro-fuzzy model for mineral potential mapping. Mathematical Geology, 36, 803–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Porwal, A., Carranza, E. J. M., & Hale, M. (2006a). Bayesian network classifiers for mineral potential mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 32, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Porwal, A., Carranza, E. J. M., & Hale, M. (2006b). A hybrid fuzzy weights-of-evidence model for mineral potential mapping. Natural Resources Research, 15, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rezaei, S., Lotfi, M., Afzal, P., Jafari, M. R., Meigoony, M. S., & Khalajmasoumi, M. (2015). Investigation of copper and gold prospects using index overlay integration method and multifractal modeling in Saveh 1: 100,000 sheet, Central Iran. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi, 31, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodriguez-Galiano, V., Sanchez-Castillo, M., Chica-Olmo, M., & Chica-Rivas, M. (2015). Machine learning predictive models for mineral prospectivity: An evaluation of neural networks, random forest, regression trees and support vector machines. Ore Geology Reviews, 71, 804–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roshanravan, B., Aghajani, H., Yousefi, M., & Kreuzer, O. (2018). Particle swarm optimization algorithm for neuro-fuzzy prospectivity analysis using continuously weighted spatial exploration data. Natural Resources Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9385-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Saric, V., Nedeljkovic, R., & Colovic, M. (1972). Report on explorations for copper in Nowchun area (pp. 1–39). Geological survey of Iran (GSI) internal report (unpublished).Google Scholar
  71. Shabankareh, M., & Hezarkhani, A. (2017). Application of support vector machines for copper potential mapping in Kerman region, Iran. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 128, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sridhar, M., Babu, V. R., Chaturvedi, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Predictive GIS modeling from landsat, AGRS, aeromagnetic and ground surveys for uranium exploration—A case study from Sonakhan Block, Chhattisgarh, India. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 43, 347–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tangestani, M. H., & Moore, F. (2002). The use of Dempster–Shafer model and GIS in integration of geoscientific data for porphyry copper potential mapping, north of Shahr-e-Babak, Iran. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 4, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yager, R. R. (1988). On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 18, 183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yager, R. R. (1996). Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 11, 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yager, R. R. (1997). On the inclusion of importances in OWA aggregations. In R. R. Yager & J. Kacprzyk (Eds.), The ordered weighted averaging operators (pp. 41–59). Boston, MA: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6123-1_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Young, P., Parkinson, S., & Lees, M. (1996). Simplicity out of complexity in environmental modelling: Occam’s razor revisited. Journal of Applied Statistics, 23, 165–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yousefi, M., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2015a). Fuzzification of continuous-value spatial evidence for mineral prospectivity mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 74, 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yousefi, M., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2015b). Geometric average of spatial evidence data layers: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision-making approach to mineral prospectivity mapping. Computers & Geosciences, 83, 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yousefi, M., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2015c). Prediction–area (P–A) plot and C–A fractal analysis to classify and evaluate evidential maps for mineral prospectivity modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 79, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yousefi, M., & Carranza, E. J. M. (2016). Data-driven index overlay and Boolean logic mineral prospectivity modeling in greenfields exploration. Natural Resources Research, 25, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yousefi, M., & Nykänen, V. (2017). Introduction to the special issue: GIS-based mineral potential targeting. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 128, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yuan, F., Li, X., Zhang, M., Jowitt, S. M., Jia, C., Zheng, T., et al. (2014). Three-dimensional weights of evidence-based prospectivity modeling: A case study of the Baixiangshan mining area, Ningwu Basin, Middle and Lower Yangtze Metallogenic Belt, China. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 145, 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zadeh, L. A. (1983). A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 9, 149–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhang, D., Agterberg, F., Cheng, Q., & Zuo, R. (2014). A comparison of modified fuzzy weights of evidence, fuzzy weights of evidence, and logistic regression for mapping mineral prospectivity. Mathematical Geosciences, 46, 869–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhang, N., & Zhou, K. (2015). Mineral prospectivity mapping with weights of evidence and fuzzy logic methods. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29, 2639–2651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang, Z., Zuo, R., & Xiong, Y. (2016). A comparative study of fuzzy weights of evidence and random forests for mapping mineral prospectivity for skarn-type Fe deposits in the southwestern Fujian metallogenic belt, China. Science China Earth Sciences, 59, 556–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Association for Mathematical Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gholam-Reza Elyasi
    • 1
  • Abbas Bahroudi
    • 1
  • Maysam Abedi
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mining Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations