Advertisement

Nanoscale thermal transport in epoxy matrix composite materials reinforced with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets

  • Junjie ChenEmail author
  • Baofang Liu
  • Longfei Yan
Research Paper
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The technology related to hybrid filler-reinforced polymer matrix composite materials is growing at a high rate with increasing interest and usage. This study presents a way of increasing the thermal conductivity of polymer matrix composites by the use of a hybrid filler consisting of carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets and preliminarily clarifies the mechanisms that lead to the synergistic reinforcement of composite thermal conductivity at the nanoscale. The focus of this study was upon the fundamental relationships between nanometer-scale reinforcement structures and macroscopic composite thermal properties. The benefits and limitations associated with the incorporation of the hybrid filler into an epoxy matrix were evaluated. The results indicated that there exists an evident synergistic reinforcing effect between carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets on composite thermal conductivity. A significant increase has been gained in composite thermal conductivity, but low loading is required in order to exploit the benefits derived from the unique structure of the hybrid filler. Filler loading must be controlled very accurately in order to ensure that a critical threshold is not reached, beyond which there is a decrease in thermal conductivity, compared to that of graphene nanoplatelet-reinforced composites. The synergistic reinforcing benefits to composite thermal conductivity and is derived from effective conducting pathways formed between carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets within polymer matrices. The results can offer practical guidance on how to improve thermal transport properties for polymer matrix composite materials.

Graphical abstract

The transport behavior of thermal energy in epoxy matrix composite materials at the nanoscale is studied. There exists an evident synergistic reinforcing effect between carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets on composite thermal conductivity, but low loading is required to exploit the benefits derived from such a hybrid nanoparticle filler.

Keywords

Polymer nanocomposites Thermal properties Bridging mechanism Carbon nanotubes Graphene nanoplatelets Structure-property relations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering for the support of preparation and characterization of polymer matrix composites.

Authors’ contributions

JC conceived and designed the study and performed the experiments. All authors analyzed and interpreted the data regarding the thermal and electrical properties of polymer matrix composites and read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51506048).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Agrawal A, Satapathy A (2015) Mathematical model for evaluating effective thermal conductivity of polymer composites with hybrid fillers. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 89:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Saleh MH (2015) Electrical and mechanical properties of graphene/carbon nanotube hybrid nanocomposites. Synthetic Metals 209:41–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bagotia N, Choudhary V, Sharma DK (2019) Synergistic effect of graphene/multiwalled carbon nanotube hybrid fillers on mechanical, electrical and EMI shielding properties of polycarbonate/ethylene methyl acrylate nanocomposites. Composites Part B: Engineering 159:378–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balandin AA (2011) Thermal properties of graphene and nanostructured carbon materials. Nature Materials 10:569–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Miao F, Lau CN (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Letters 8:902–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balazs AC, Emrick T, Russell TP (2006) Nanoparticle polymer composites: where two small worlds meet. Science 314:1107–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonnet P, Sireude D, Garnier B, Chauvet O (2007) Thermal properties and percolation in carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Applied Physics Letters 91:201910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryning MB, Milkie DE, Islam MF, Kikkawa JM, Yodh AG (2005) Thermal conductivity and interfacial resistance in single-wall carbon nanotube epoxy composites. Applied Physics Letters 87:161909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burger N, Laachachi A, Ferriol M, Lutz M, Toniazzo V, Ruch D (2016) Review of thermal conductivity in composites: mechanisms, parameters and theory. Progress in Polymer Science 61:1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cahill DG, Braun PV, Chen G, Clarke DR, Fan S, Goodson KE, Keblinski P, King WP, Mahan GD, Majumdar A, Maris HJ, Phillpot SR, Pop E, Shi L (2014) Nanoscale thermal transport. II. 2003-2012. Applied Physics Reviews 1: 011305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee S, Nafezarefi F, Tai NH, Schlagenhauf L, Nüesch FA, Chu BTT (2012) Size and synergy effects of nanofiller hybrids including graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes in mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 50:5380–5386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chegel R, Behzad S (2019) Tight binding theory of thermal conductivity of doped carbon nanotube. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 114:113586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen H, Ginzburg VV, Yang J, Yang Y, Liu W, Huang Y, Du L, Chen B (2016) Thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites: fundamentals and applications. Progress in Polymer Science 59:41–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chu K, Li W-S, Jia C-C, Tang F-L (2012) Thermal conductivity of composites with hybrid carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets. Applied Physics Letters 101:211903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clancy TC, Gates TS (2006) Modeling of interfacial modification effects on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Polymer 47:5990–5996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feng W, Qin M, Feng Y (2016) Toward highly thermally conductive all-carbon composites: structure control. Carbon 109:575–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaska K, Rybak A, Kapusta C, Sekula R, Siwek A (2015) Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy-matrix composites with hybrid fillers. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 26:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh S, Calizo I, Teweldebrhan D, Pokatilov EP, Nika DL, Balandin AA, Bao W, Miao F, Lau CN (2008) Extremely high thermal conductivity of graphene: prospects for thermal management applications in nanoelectronic circuits. Applied Physics Letters 92:151911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gulotty R, Castellino M, Jagdale P, Tagliaferro A, Balandin AA (2013) Effects of functionalization on thermal properties of single-wall and multi-wall carbon nanotube-polymer nanocomposites. ACS Nano 7:5114–5121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haggenmueller R, Guthy C, Lukes JR, Fischer JE, Winey KI (2007) Single wall carbon nanotube/polyethylene nanocomposites: thermal and electrical conductivity. Macromolecules 40:2417–2421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Han NR, Cho JW (2018) Effect of click coupled hybrids of graphene oxide and thin-walled carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of polyurethane nanocomposites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 109:376–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Han Z, Fina A (2011) Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: a review. Progress in Polymer Science 36:914–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu H, He Y, Long Z, Zhan Y (2017) Synergistic effect of functional carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide on the anti-corrosion performance of epoxy coating. Polymers for Advanced Technologies 28:754–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hua Y, Li F, Liu Y, Huang G-W, Xiao H-M, Li Y-Q, Hu N, Fu S-Y (2017) Positive synergistic effect of graphene oxide/carbon nanotube hybrid coating on glass fiber/epoxy interfacial normal bond strength. Composites Science and Technology 149:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huang X, Zhi C, Jiang P (2012) Toward effective synergetic effects from graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes on thermal conductivity of ultrahigh volume fraction nanocarbon epoxy composites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 116:23812–23820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang C, Qian X, Yang R (2018) Thermal conductivity of polymers and polymer nanocomposites. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 132:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huxtable ST, Cahill DG, Shenogin S, Xue L, Ozisik R, Barone P, Usrey M, Strano MS, Siddons G, Shim M, Keblinski P (2003) Interfacial heat flow in carbon nanotube suspensions. Nature Materials 2:731–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaur S, Raravikar N, Helms BA, Prasher R, Ogletree DF (2014) Enhanced thermal transport at covalently functionalized carbon nanotube array interfaces. Nature Communications 5:3082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khare KS, Khabaz F, Khare R (2014) Effect of carbon nanotube functionalization on mechanical and thermal properties of cross-linked epoxy-carbon nanotube nanocomposites: role of strengthening the interfacial interactions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 6:6098–6110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim P, Shi L, Majumdar A, McEuen PL (2001) Thermal transport measurements of individual multiwalled nanotubes. Physical Review Letters 87:215502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim HM, Lee S, Song YS, Lee D (2019) Synergistic improvement of electrical and thermal conductivities of carbon-based nanocomposites and its prediction by Mori-Tanaka scheme with interfacial resistances. Composite Structures 211:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King JA, Barton RL, Hauser RA, Keith JM (2008a) Synergistic effects of carbon fillers in electrically and thermally conductive liquid crystal polymer based resins. Polymer Composites 29:421–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. King JA, Hauser RA, Tomson AM, Wescoat IM, Keith JM (2008b) Synergistic effects of carbon fillers in thermally conductive liquid crystal polymer based resins. Journal of Composite Materials 42:91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. King JA, Keith JM, Glenn OL Jr, Miskioglu I, Cole AJ, McLaughlin SR, Pagel RM (2008c) Synergistic effects of carbon fillers on tensile and flexural properties in liquid-crystal polymer based resins. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 108:1657–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King JA, Via MD, Mills OP, Alpers DS, Sutherland JW, Bogucki GR (2011) Effects of multiple carbon fillers on the electrical and thermal conductivity and tensile and flexural modulus of polycarbonate-based resins. Journal of Composite Materials 46:331–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kinloch IA, Suhr J, Lou J, Young RJ, Ajayan PM (2018) Composites with carbon nanotubes and graphene: an outlook. Science 362:547–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Konell JP, King JA, Miskioglu I (2004) Synergistic effects of carbon fillers on tensile and impact properties in nylon 6,6 and polycarbonate based resins. Polymer Composites 25:172–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kong HX (2013) Hybrids of carbon nanotubes and graphene/graphene oxide. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 17:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar S, Sun LL, Caceres S, Li B, Wood W, Perugini A, Maguire RG, Zhong WH (2010) Dynamic synergy of graphitic nanoplatelets and multi-walled carbon nanotubes in polyetherimide nanocomposites. Nanotechnology 21:105702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee G-W, Park M, Kim J, Lee JI, Yoon HG (2006) Enhanced thermal conductivity of polymer composites filled with hybrid filler. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 37:727–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee S, Kim HM, Seong DG, Lee D (2019) Synergistic improvement of flame retardant properties of expandable graphite and multi-walled carbon nanotube reinforced intumescent polyketone nanocomposites. Carbon 143:650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li W, Dichiara A, Bai J (2013) Carbon nanotube-graphene nanoplatelet hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Composites Science and Technology 74:221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li C-Q, Zha J-W, Li Z-J, Zhang D-L, Wang S-J, Dang Z-M (2018) Towards balanced mechanical and electrical properties of thermoplastic vulcanizates composites via unique synergistic effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes and graphene. Composites Science and Technology 157:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Liang X, Cheng Q (2018) Synergistic reinforcing effect from graphene and carbon nanotubes. Composites Communications 10:122–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lu H, Zhang J, Luo J, Gong W, Li C, Li Q, Zhang K, Hu M, Yao Y (2017) Enhanced thermal conductivity of free-standing 3D hierarchical carbon nanotube-graphene hybrid paper. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 102:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luo T, Lloyd JR (2012) Enhancement of thermal energy transport across graphene/graphite and polymer interfaces: a molecular dynamics study. Advanced Functional Materials 22:2495–2502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Maiti S, Shrivastava NK, Suin S, Khatua BB (2013) Polystyrene/MWCNT/graphite nanoplate nanocomposites: efficient electromagnetic interference shielding material through graphite nanoplate-MWCNT-graphite nanoplate networking. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 5:4712–4724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McNamara AJ, Joshi Y, Zhang ZM (2012) Characterization of nanostructured thermal interface materials - a review. International Journal of Thermal Sciences 62:2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moore AL, Shi L (2014) Emerging challenges and materials for thermal management of electronics. Materials Today 17:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ni Y, Han H, Volz S, Dumitricǎ T (2015) Nanoscale azide polymer functionalization: a robust solution for suppressing the carbon nanotube-polymer matrix thermal interface resistance. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119:12193–12198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pokharel P, Xiao D, Erogbogbo F, Keles O, Lee DS (2019) A hierarchical approach for creating electrically conductive network structure in polyurethane nanocomposites using a hybrid of graphene nanoplatelets, carbon black and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Composites Part B: Engineering 161:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prasad KE, Das B, Maitra U, Ramamurty U, Rao CNR (2009) Extraordinary synergy in the mechanical properties of polymer matrix composites reinforced with 2 nanocarbons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:13186–13189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramanathan T, Abdala AA, Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Herrera-Alonso M, Piner RD, Adamson DH, Schniepp HC, Chen X, Ruoff RS, Nguyen ST, Aksay IA, Prud'Homme RK, Brinson LC (2008) Functionalized graphene sheets for polymer nanocomposites. Nature Nanotechnology 3:327–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sagalianov I, Vovchenko L, Matzui L, Lazarenko O (2017) Synergistic enhancement of the percolation threshold in hybrid polymeric nanocomposites based on carbon nanotubes and graphite nanoplatelets. Nanoscale Research Letters 12:140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shahil KMF, Balandin AA (2012) Thermal properties of graphene and multilayer graphene: applications in thermal interface materials. Solid State Communications 152:1331–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shenogin S, Bodapati A, Xue L, Ozisik R, Keblinski P (2004a) Effect of chemical functionalization on thermal transport of carbon nanotube composites. Applied Physics Letters 85:2229–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shenogin S, Xue L, Ozisik R, Keblinski P, Cahill DG (2004b) Role of thermal boundary resistance on the heat flow in carbon-nanotube composites. Journal of Applied Physics 95:8136–8144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shenogina N, Shenogin S, Xue L, Keblinski P (2005) On the lack of thermal percolation in carbon nanotube composites. Applied Physics Letters 87:133106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shin MK, Lee B, Kim SH, Lee JA, Spinks GM, Gambhir S, Wallace GG, Kozlov ME, Baughman RH, Kim SJ (2012) Synergistic toughening of composite fibres by self-alignment of reduced graphene oxide and carbon nanotubes. Nature Communications 3:650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shtein M, Nadiv R, Buzaglo M, Kahil K, Regev O (2015) Thermally conductive graphene-polymer composites: size, percolation, and synergy effects. Chemistry of Materials 27:2100–2106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Song PC, Liu CH, Fan SS (2006) Improving the thermal conductivity of nanocomposites by increasing the length efficiency of loading carbon nanotubes. Applied Physics Letters 88:153111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Song SH, Park KH, Kim BH, Choi YW, Jun GH, Lee DJ, Kong B-S, Paik K-W, Jeon S (2013) Enhanced thermal conductivity of epoxy-graphene composites by using non-oxidized graphene flakes with non-covalent functionalization. Advanced Materials 25:732–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Song S, Cao M, Shan H, Du C, Li B (2018a) Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane functionalized carbon nanotubes for high thermal conductive poly(vinylidene fluoride) composite membrane. Materials & Design 156:242–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Song H, Liu J, Liu B, Wu J, Cheng H-M, Kang F (2018b) Two-dimensional materials for thermal management applications. Joule 2:442–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Su Y, Li JJ, Weng GJ (2018) Theory of thermal conductivity of graphene-polymer nanocomposites with interfacial Kapitza resistance and graphene-graphene contact resistance. Carbon 137:222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Thostenson ET, Ziaee S, Chou T-W (2009) Processing and electrical properties of carbon nanotube/vinyl ester nanocomposites. Composites Science and Technology 69:801–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Valentini L, Bon SB, Pugno NM, Santana MH, Lopez-Manchado MA, Giorgi G (2019) Synergistic icephobic behaviour of swollen nitrile butadiene rubber graphene and/or carbon nanotube composites. Composites Part B: Engineering 166:352–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vijayan R, Ghazinezami A, Taklimi SR, Khan MY, Askari D (2019) The geometrical advantages of helical carbon nanotubes for high-performance multifunctional polymeric nanocomposites. Composites Part B: Engineering 156:28–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang T-Y, Tsai J-L (2016) Investigating thermal conductivities of functionalized graphene and graphene/epoxy nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science 122:272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Warzoha RJ, Fleischer AS (2014) Heat flow at nanoparticle interfaces. Nano Energy 6:137–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Weber EH, Clingerman ML, King JA (2003a) Thermally conductive nylon 6,6 and polycarbonate based resins. I. Synergistic effects of carbon fillers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 88:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weber EH, Clingerman ML, King JA (2003b) Thermally conductive nylon 6,6 and polycarbonate based resins. II. Modeling. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 88:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Winey KI, Vaia RA (2007) Polymer nanocomposites. MRS Bulletin 32:314–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu H, Drzal LT (2013) High thermally conductive graphite nanoplatelet/polyetherimide composite by precoating: effect of percolation and particle size. Polymer Composites 34:2148–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Xu X, Chen J, Zhou J, Li B (2018) Thermal conductivity of polymers and their nanocomposites. Advanced Materials 30:1705544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yang S-Y, Lin W-N, Huang Y-L, Tien H-W, Wang J-Y, Ma C-CM, Li S-M, Wang Y-S (2011) Synergetic effects of graphene platelets and carbon nanotubes on the mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy composites. Carbon 49:793–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yu C, Shi L, Yao Z, Li D, Majumdar A (2005) Thermal conductance and thermopower of an individual single-wall carbon nanotube. Nano Letters 5:1842–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yu A, Ramesh P, Sun X, Bekyarova E, Itkis ME, Haddon RC (2008) Enhanced thermal conductivity in a hybrid graphite nanoplatelet - carbon nanotube filler for epoxy composites. Advanced Materials 20:4740–4744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yue L, Pircheraghi G, Monemian SA, Manas-Zloczower I (2014) Epoxy composites with carbon nanotubes and graphene nanoplatelets - Dispersion and synergy effects. Carbon 78:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhai S, Zhang P, Xian Y, Zeng J, Shi B (2018) Effective thermal conductivity of polymer composites: theoretical models and simulation models. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 117:358–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhang Y, Park S-J (2018) In situ shear-induced mercapto group-activated graphite nanoplatelets for fabricating mechanically strong and thermally conductive elastomer composites for thermal management applications. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 112:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhang Y, Park S-J (2019) Imidazolium-optimized conductive interfaces in multilayer graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites for thermal management applications and electroactive devices. Polymer 168:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang S, Yin S, Rong C, Huo P, Jiang Z, Wang G (2013) Synergistic effects of functionalized graphene and functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the electrical and mechanical properties of poly(ether sulfone) composites. European Polymer Journal 49:3125–3134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhang Y, Heo Y-J, Son Y-R, In I, An K-H, Kim B-J, Park S-J (2019) Recent advanced thermal interfacial materials: a review of conducting mechanisms and parameters of carbon materials. Carbon 142:445–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhou L, Liu H, Zhang X (2015) Graphene and carbon nanotubes for the synergistic reinforcement of polyamide 6 fibers. Journal of Materials Science 50:2797–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zhou E, Xi J, Guo Y, Liu Y, Xu Z, Peng L, Gao W, Ying J, Chen Z, Gao C (2018) Synergistic effect of graphene and carbon nanotube for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding films. Carbon 133:316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy and Power Engineering, School of Mechanical and Power EngineeringHenan Polytechnic UniversityJiaozuoChina

Personalised recommendations