Advertisement

In situ preparation of Ag3VO4/MOFs composites with enhanced visible-light-driven catalytic activity

  • Boyin Zhai
  • Ying ChenEmail author
  • Yuning Liang
Research Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

In this work, we have fabricated a novel Ag3VO4/MIL-125(Ti) photocatalyst by in situ deposition method, which is characterized by XRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR, XPS, TG, BET, UV-Vis DRS, and PL. The photocatalytic degradation activity of as-prepared materials was studied via decomposing Rh B, and the possible mechanism of photocatalytic degradation was put forward. The result displayed that the specific surface area of a series of composites is larger than that of the single Ag3VO4 (SBET = 9.374 m2/g), and the photocatalytic efficiency is much higher than that of pure Ag3VO4 and MIL-125(Ti). Among them, the photocatalytic activity of AM-3 composite (SBET = 89.734 m2/g, Eg = 2.13 eV) is the highest, about 3.7 times and 13.1 times of pure Ag3VO4 and MIL-125(Ti), respectively. At the same time, the Ag3VO4/MIL-125(Ti) composite can maintain a stable photocatalytic activity and structure after four cycles.

Graphical abstract

The possible route of photoelectron generation and transport in the Ag3VO4/MIL-125(Ti) composite

Keywords

Ag3VO4 MIL-125(Ti) Nanostructured catalyst Photocatalytic activity Photodegration mechanism 

Notes

Funding information

This work received financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 51146008).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Akbarzadeh R, Fung CSL, Rather RA, Lo IMC (2018) One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of g-C3N4/Ag/AgCl/BiVO4 micro-flower composite for the visible light degradation of ibuprofen. Chem Eng J 341:248–261.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barzegar J, Habibi-Yangjeh A, Akhundi A, Vadivel S (2018) Novel ternary g-C3N4/Ag3VO4/AgBr nanocomposites with excellent visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance for environmental applications. Solid State Sci 78:133–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Y, Zhai B, Liang Y (2019a) Enhanced degradation performance of organic dyes removal by semiconductor/MOF/graphene oxide composites under visible light irradiation. Diam Relat Mater 98:107508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2019.107508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Zhai B, Liang Y, Li Y, Li J (2019b) Preparation of CdS/g-C3N4/MOF composite with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for dye degradation. J Solid State Chem 274:32–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2019.01.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chong MN, Jin B, Chow CWK, Saint C (2010) Recent developments in photocatalytic water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 44:2997–3027 doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dan-Hardi M, Serre C, Frot T, Rozes L, Maurin G, Sanchez C, Férey G (2009) A new photoactive crystalline highly porous titanium(IV) dicarboxylate. J Am Chem Soc 131:10857–10859.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja903726m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu Y, Sun D, Chen Y, Huang R, Ding Z, Fu X, Li Z (2012) An amine-functionalized titanium metal–organic framework photocatalyst with visible-light-induced activity for CO2 reduction. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:3364–3367.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201108357 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo H, Guo D, Zheng Z, Weng W, Chen J (2015) Visible-light photocatalytic activity of Ag@MIL-125(Ti) microspheres Applied Organometallic Chemistry 29:618-623  https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.3341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Han X, Yang X, Liu G, Li Z, Shao L (2019) Boosting visible light photocatalytic activity via impregnation-induced RhB-sensitized MIL-125(Ti). Chem Eng Res Des 143:90–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Han Y et al (2018a) A facile strategy for fabricating AgI–MIL-53(Fe) composites: superior interfacial contact and enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance. New J Chem 42:3799–3807.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ00417J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Han Y et al (2018b) Ag3PO4-MIL-53(Fe) composites with visible-light-enhanced photocatalytic activities for rhodamine B degradation. ChemistrySelect 3:8045–8050.  https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201800404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hu Q et al (2019) In-situ preparation of NH2-MIL-125(Ti)/BiOCl composite with accelerating charge carriers for boosting visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 466:525–534.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.10.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang C-M, Pan G-T, Li Y-CM, Li M-H, Yang TCK (2009) Crystalline phases and photocatalytic activities of hydrothermal synthesis Ag3VO4 and Ag4V2O7 under visible light irradiation. Appl Catal A Gen 358:164–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jalali S, Rahimi MR, Dashtian K, Ghaedi M, Mosleh S (2019) One step integration of plasmonic Ag2CrO4/Ag/AgCl into HKUST-1-MOF as novel visible-light driven photocatalyst for highly efficient degradation of mixture dyes pollutants: its photocatalytic mechanism and modeling. Polyhedron 166:217–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2019.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeremias F, Lozan V, Henninger SK, Janiak C (2013) Programming MOFs for water sorption: amino-functionalized MIL-125 and UiO-66 for heat transformation and heat storage applications. Dalton Trans 42:15967–15973.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3DT51471D CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang K et al (2018) A biocompatible Ti-based metal-organic framework for pH responsive drug delivery. Mater Lett 225:142–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaur R, Vellingiri K, Kim K-H, Paul AK, Deep A (2016) Efficient photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine 6G with a quantum dot-metal organic framework nanocomposite. Chemosphere 154:620–627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim J, Cho H-Y, Ahn W-S (2012) Synthesis and adsorption/catalytic properties of the metal organic framework CuBTC. Catal Surv Jpn 16:106–119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10563-012-9135-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim S-N, Kim J, Kim H-Y, Cho H-Y, Ahn W-S (2013) Adsorption/catalytic properties of MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125. Catal Today 204:85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Le S, Li W, Li Y, Borjigin B, Li G, Wang X (2019) Tetracycline removal under solar illumination over Ag3VO4/mpg-C3N4 heterojunction photocatalysts. Photochem Photobiol 95:501–511.  https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li J, Fang W, Yu C, Zhou W, Zhu L, Xie Y (2015) Ag-based semiconductor photocatalysts in environmental purification. Appl Surf Sci 358:46–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.07.139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li Y, Fang Y, Cao Z, Li N, Chen D, Xu Q, Lu J (2019) Construction of g-C3N4/PDI@MOF heterojunctions for the highly efficient visible light-driven degradation of pharmaceutical and phenolic micropollutants. Appl Catal B Environ 250:150–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Z-Q, Wang A, Guo C-Y, Tai Y-F, Qiu L-G (2013) One-pot synthesis of metal–organic framework@SiO2 core–shell nanoparticles with enhanced visible-light photoactivity. Dalton Trans 42:13948–13954.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3DT50845E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu H, Zhang J, Ao D (2018) Construction of heterostructured ZnIn2S4@NH2-MIL-125(Ti) nanocomposites for visible-light-driven H2 production. Appl Catal B Environ 221:433–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.09.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pirhashemi M, Habibi-Yangjeh A (2016) Ultrasonic-assisted preparation of novel ternary ZnO/Ag3VO4/Ag2CrO4 nanocomposites and their enhanced visible-light activities in degradation of different pollutants. Solid State Sci 55:58–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2016.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pourahmad A (2012) Ag2S nanoparticle encapsulated in mesoporous material nanoparticles and its application for photocatalytic degradation of dye in aqueous solution. Superlattice Microst 52:276–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2012.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rada ZH et al (2015) Effects of amino functionality on uptake of CO2, CH4 and selectivity of CO2/CH4 on titanium based MOFs. Fuel 160:318–327.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rahmani A, Emrooz HBM, Abedi S, Morsali A (2018) Synthesis and characterization of CdS/MIL-125 (Ti) as a photocatalyst for water splitting. Mater Sci Semicond Process 80:44–51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sabo M, Böhlmann W, Kaskel S (2006) Titanium terephthalate (TT-1) hybrid materials with high specific surface area. J Mater Chem 16:2354–2357.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B601043A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Santaclara JG et al (2016) Organic linker defines the excited-state decay of photocatalytic MIL-125(Ti)-type materials. ChemSusChem 9:388–395.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201501353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Senapati S, Srivastava SK, Singh SB (2012) Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of magnetically separable hexagonal Ni/ZnO nanostructure. Nanoscale 4:6604–6612.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2NR31831H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sha Z, Chan HSO, Wu J (2015) Ag2CO3/UiO-66(Zr) composite with enhanced visible-light promoted photocatalytic activity for dye degradation. J Hazard Mater 299:132–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. She X et al. (2017) Designing Z-scheme 2D-C3N4/Ag3VO4 hybrid structures for improved photocatalysis and photocatalytic mechanism insight. physica status solidi (a) 214:1600946  https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201600946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sun D, Ye L, Li Z (2015) Visible-light-assisted aerobic photocatalytic oxidation of amines to imines over NH2-MIL-125(Ti). Appl Catal B Environ 164:428–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.09.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Surib NA, Kuila A, Saravanan P, Sim LC, Leong KH (2018) A ligand strategic approach with Cu-MOF for enhanced solar light photocatalysis. New J Chem 42:11124–11130.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NJ01932K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tong H, Ouyang S, Bi Y, Umezawa N, Oshikiri M, Ye J (2012) Nano-photocatalytic materials: possibilities and challenges. Adv Mater 24:229–251.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201102752 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang H et al (2015) Facile synthesis of amino-functionalized titanium metal-organic frameworks and their superior visible-light photocatalytic activity for Cr(VI) reduction. J Hazard Mater 286:187–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.11.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang H et al (2016a) In situ synthesis of In2S3@MIL-125(Ti) core–shell microparticle for the removal of tetracycline from wastewater by integrated adsorption and visible-light-driven photocatalysis. Appl Catal B Environ 186:19–29.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.12.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang M et al (2018) Heterostructured Bi2S3@NH2-MIL-125(Ti) nanocomposite as a bifunctional photocatalyst for Cr(vi) reduction and rhodamine B degradation under visible light. RSC Adv 8:12459–12470.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA00882E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang P, Tang H, Ao Y, Wang C, Hou J, Qian J, Li Y (2016b) In-situ growth of Ag3VO4 nanoparticles onto BiOCl nanosheet to form a heterojunction photocatalyst with enhanced performance under visible light irradiation. J Alloys Compd 688:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang X, Li S, Yu H, Yu J, Liu S (2011) Ag2O as a new visible-light photocatalyst: self-stability and high photocatalytic activity. Chem Eur J 17:7777–7780.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201101032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wu J, Shen X, Miao X, Ji Z, Wang J, Wang T, Liu M (2017) An all-solid-state Z-scheme g-C3N4/Ag/Ag3VO4 Photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performance. Eur J Inorg Chem 2017:2845–2853.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201700215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wu S-Z, Li K, Zhang W-D (2015) On the heterostructured photocatalysts Ag3VO4/g-C3N4 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 324:324–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yan M, Wu Y, Yan Y, Yan X, Zhu F, Hua Y, Shi W (2016) Synthesis and characterization of novel BiVO4/Ag3VO4 heterojunction with enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of dyes. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:757–766.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yang J, Niu X, An S, Chen W, Wang J, Liu W (2017) Facile synthesis of Bi2MoO6–MIL-100(Fe) metal–organic framework composites with enhanced photocatalytic performance. RSC Adv 7:2943–2952.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA26110H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yang J, Xie T, Liu C, Xu L (2018a) Facile fabrication of dumbbell-like β-Bi2O3/graphene nanocomposites and their highly efficient photocatalytic activity. Materials 11  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11081359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang Z et al (2018b) Preparation of BiVO4/MIL-125(Ti) composite with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for dye degradation. Appl Organomet Chem 32:e4285.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.4285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ye F, Li H, Yu H, Chen S, Quan X (2017) Hydrothermal fabrication of few-layer MoS2 nanosheets within nanopores on TiO2 derived from MIL-125(Ti) for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution. Appl Surf Sci 426:177–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yuan X et al (2016) One-pot self-assembly and photoreduction synthesis of silver nanoparticle-decorated reduced graphene oxide/MIL-125(Ti) photocatalyst with improved visible light photocatalytic activity. Appl Organomet Chem 30:289–296.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.3430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang J, Ma Z (2017) Flower-like Ag3VO4/BiOBr n-p heterojunction photocatalysts with enhanced visible-light-driven catalytic activity. Mol Catal 436:190–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang M et al (2018) Enhanced degradation performance of organic dyes removal by bismuth vanadate-reduced graphene oxide composites under visible light radiation. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 559:169–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.09.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhang Y, Cong H, Fu B, Wen S, Ruan S (2013) A novel humidity sensor based on NH2-MIL-125(Ti) metal organic framework with high responsiveness. J Nanopart Res 15:2014.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-2014-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao W et al (2019) A novel Z-scheme Ag3VO4/BiVO4 heterojunction photocatalyst: study on the excellent photocatalytic performance and photocatalytic mechanism. Appl Catal B Environ 245:448–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zlotea C et al (2011) Effect of NH2 and CF3 functionalization on the hydrogen sorption properties of MOFs. Dalton Trans 40:4879–4881.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1DT10115C CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Oil and Natural Gas Processing, School of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringNortheast Petroleum UniversityDaQingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations