Advertisement

γ-Fe2O3 photocatalyst immobilized on a porous Ni substrate for recyclable solar photocatalysis

  • Syed Nabeel Ahmed
  • Aqil Inam
  • Waseem HaiderEmail author
Brief Communication
  • 40 Downloads

Abstract

This study aims to improve the efficiency of fixed-bed-type photocatalytic reactors by immobilizing maghemite photocatalytic nanoparticles on a porous nickel substrate by using autoclave method. The resulting three-dimensional maghemite-Ni photocatalyst (3DMNP) has been characterized by using SEM/EDS, XRD, FTIR, TGA, and DTA. The photocatalytic behavior of the 3DMNP has been studied through the degradation of methyl orange in ultraviolet light as well as natural sunlight. It has been reported that the prepared 3DMNP demonstrates an excellent photocatalytic activity in both UV light and sunlight and can also be easily recycled for at least three subsequent cycles. This improved photocatalytic performance can be attributed to the charge carrier separation caused by the presence of nickel.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Maghemite Heterogeneous photocatalysis Three-dimensional photocatalyst Nanostructured catalysts 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abramovic BF, Banic ND, Krstic JB (2013) Degradation of thiacloprid by ZnO in a laminar falling film slurry photocatalytic reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res 52(14):5040–5047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed N, Haider W (2018) Heterogeneous photocatalysis and its potential applications in water and wastewater treatment: a review. Nanotechnology 29:342001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali A, Oh W (2017) Preparation of nanowire like WSe2-graphene nanocomposite for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into CH3OH with the presence of sacrificial agents. Sci Rep 7(1867):1–11Google Scholar
  4. Alias NH, Jaafar J, Samitsu S, Matsuura T, Ismail AF, Othman MHD, Rahman MA, Othman NH, Abdullah N, Paiman SH, Yusof N, Aziz F (2019) Photocatalytic nanofiber-coated alumina hollow fiber membranes for highly efficient oilfield produced water treatment. Chem Eng J 360:1437–1446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. An M et al (2019) Three-dimensional ordered hollow sphere composite Pt/TiO2-ZrO2 : enhanced performance of photocatalytic degradation and photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J Nanopart Res 21(117):1–17Google Scholar
  6. Arakha M et al (2015) Antimicrobial activity of iron oxide nanoparticle upon modulation of nanoparticle-bacteria interface. Sci Rep 5:1–12Google Scholar
  7. Baig U, Matin A, Gondal MA, Zubair SM (2019) Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic, superoleophilic photocatalytic membrane for efficient oil-water separation and removal of hazardous organic pollutants. J Clean Prod 208:904–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanco M et al (2019) TiO2 -doped electrospun nanofibrous membrane for photocatalytic water treatment. Polymers 11, 5 747:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen X, Shi R, Chen Q, Zhang Z, Jiang W, Zhu Y, Zhang T (2019) Three-dimensional porous g-C3N4 for highly efficient photocatalytic overall water splitting. Nano Energy 59:644–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coricovac D-E et al (2017) Biocompatible colloidal suspensions based on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and toxicological profile. Front Pharmacol 8:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ennas G et al (1999) Characterization of nanocrystalline γ-Fe2O3 prepared by wet chemical method. J Mater Res 14(4):1570–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature Publishing GroupGoogle Scholar
  13. Gebregiorgis T, van Hullebusch ED, Hagos K (2018) Decolourization of real textile wastewater by the combination of photocatalytic and biological oxidation processes. Euro-Mediterranean Conference for Environmental Integration pp 115–117Google Scholar
  14. Gong X et al (2015) Photocatalytic degradation of high ammonia concentration wastewater by TiO2. Future Cities and Environment, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  15. Guz R, de Moura C, da Cunha MAA, Rodrigues MB (2017) Factorial design application in photocatalytic wastewater degradation from TNT industry—red water. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(7):6055–6060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ibhadon AO et al (2013) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: recent advances and applications. Catalysts 3(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kartsonakis IA, Kontogiani P, Pappas GS, Kordas G (2013) Photocatalytic action of cerium molybdate and iron-titanium oxide hollow nanospheres on Escherichia coli. J Nanopart Res 15(6):1–10Google Scholar
  18. Khan SJ, Reed RH, Rasul MG (2012) Thin-film fixed-bed reactor (TFFBR) for solar photocatalytic inactivation of aquaculture pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. BMC Microbiol 12(5):1–11Google Scholar
  19. Lee KM, Abdullah AH (2015) Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide/maghemite nanocomposites: influence of heat treatment on photocatalytic degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Mater Sci Semicond Process 30:298–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Z, Zhao H, Wang J, Lv P, Zhang Z, Zeng Z, Xia Q (2015) 3D heterostructure Fe3O4/Ni/C nanoplate arrays on Ni foam as binder-free anode for high performance lithium-ion battery. Electrochim Acta 182:398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liang C, Liu H, Zhou J, Peng X, Zhang H (2015) One-step synthesis of spherical γ-Fe2O3 nanopowders and the evaluation of their photocatalytic activity for orange I degradation. J Chem 2015:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luo W, Chen X, Wei Z, Liu D, Yao W, Zhu Y (2019) Three-dimensional network structure assembled by g-C3N4 nanorods for improving visible-light photocatalytic performance. Appl Catal B Environ 255:117761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohaghegh N, Faraji M, Abedini A (2019) Fabrication of electrochemically nonporous NiO–ZnO/TiO2 nanotubes/Ti plates for photocatalytic disinfection of microbiological pollutants. J Iran Chem Soc 16(6):1207–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molinari R, Lavorato C, Argurio P, Szymański K, Darowna D, Mozia S (2019) Overview of photocatalytic membrane reactors in organic synthesis, energy storage and environmental applications. Catalysts 9(3):239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mukherjee PS, Ray AK (1999) Major challenges in the design of a large-scale photocatalytic reactor for water treatment. Chem Eng Technol 22(3):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ng TW, Zhang L, Liu J, Huang G, Wang W, Wong PK (2016) Visible-light-driven photocatalytic inactivation of Escherichia coli by magnetic Fe2O3-AgBr. Water Res 90:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Peng X, Wickham J, Alivisatos AP (1998) Kinetics of II-VI and III-V colloidal semiconductor nanocrystal growth: ‘focusing’ of size distributions. J Am Chem Soc 120(98):5343–5344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Phan DD, Babick F, Trịnh THT, Nguyen MT, Samhaber W, Stintz M (2018) Investigation of fixed-bed photocatalytic membrane reactors based on submerged ceramic membranes. Chem Eng Sci 191:332–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rezaei M (2014) Performance evaluation of a continuous flow photocatalytic reactor for wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:12505–12517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roushenas P, Yusop Z, Majidnia Z, Nasrollahpour R (2016) Photocatalytic degradation of spilled oil in sea water using maghemite nanoparticles. Desalin Water Treat 57(13):5837–5841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Salazar-Alvarez G, Muhammed M, Zagorodni AA (2006) Novel flow injection synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles with narrow size distribution. Chem Eng Sci 61(14):4625–4633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sio T, Chen F, Zhao J (1999) Preparation and photocatalytic properties of a novel kind of loaded photocatalyst of TiO2/SiO2/γ-Fe2O3. Catal Lett 58:245–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sraw A, Kaur T, Pandey Y, Sobti A, Wanchoo RK, Toor AP (2018) Fixed bed recirculation type photocatalytic reactor with TiO2 immobilized clay beads for the degradation of pesticide polluted water. J Environ Chem Eng 6(6):7035–7043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Srikanth B, Goutham R, Badri Narayan R, Ramprasath A, Gopinath KP, Sankaranarayanan AR (2017) Recent advancements in supporting materials for immobilised photocatalytic applications in waste water treatment. J Environ Manag 200:60–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun YK, Ma M, Zhang Y, Gu N (2004) Synthesis of nanometer-size maghemite particles from magnetite. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 245(1–3):15–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang F et al (2017) Corn-like, recoverable γ -Fe2O3@SiO2@TiO2 photocatalyst induced by magnetic dipole interactions. Sci Rep 7(1867):1–10Google Scholar
  37. Xue Y, Su R, Zhang G, Wang Q, Wang P, Zhang W, Wang Z (2016) Visible light responsive Fe–ZnS/nickel foam photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability. RSC Adv 6(96):93370–93373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yadav SK, Jeevanandam P (2016) Synthesis of ZnO@γ-Fe2O3 core–shell nanocomposites by a facile thermal decomposition approach and their application in photocatalytic degradation of congo red. J Nanopart Res 18(7):1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yao L et al (2019) One-dimensional hierarchical CeVO4 / TiO2 heterostructures with enhanced photocatalytic performance. J Nanopart Res 21(140):1–13Google Scholar
  40. Yu J, Yu X, Huang B, Zhang X, Dai Y (2009) Hydrothermal synthesis and visible-light photocatalytic activity of novel cage-like ferric oxide hollow spheres. Cryst Growth Des 9(3):1474–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu L et al (2013) Arsenite removal from aqueous solutions by γ-Fe2O3-TiO2 magnetic nanoparticles through simultaneous photocatalytic oxidation and adsorption. J Hazard Mater 246–247:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu X, Cheng G, Zheng SY (2016) Synthesis of self-assembled multifunctional nanocomposite catalysts with highly stabilized reactivity and magnetic recyclability. Sci Rep 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang N, Xu YJ (2016) The endeavour to advance graphene-semiconductor composite-based photocatalysis. Crystengcomm. 18(1):24–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang W et al (2016) A facile TiO2/PVDF composite membrane synthesis and their application in water purification. J Nanopart Res 18(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhang Y, Shan G, Dong F, Wang C, Zhu L (2019) Glass fiber supported BiOI thin-film fixed-bed photocatalytic reactor for water decontamination under solar light irradiation. J Environ Sci (China) 80:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zheng X, Shen ZP, Shi L, Cheng R, Yuan DH (2017) Photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) in water treatment: configurations and influencing factors. Catalysts 7(8):224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering & TechnologyCentral Michigan UniversityMt. PleasantUSA
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, CEETThe University of PunjabLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations