Improved visible light photocatalytic performance through an in situ composition-transforming synthesis of BiVO4/BiOBr photocatalyst

  • Shibo Liu
  • Jingxuan Chen
  • Dongyue Liu
  • Lianwei Shan
  • Xiaoliang ZhangEmail author
Research Paper


The monoclinic scheelite (ms) BiVO4 shows great potential applications in the photocatalyst due to its strong light absorption in the visible light region. To improve the separation of photoinduced charge carriers in BiVO4, such as election and hole, BiVO4/BiOBr photocatalyst with a high visible light activity was synthesized using an in situ chemical transformation method with BiVO4 as a matrix and hydrobromic acid (HBr) as a construction agent. The effect of the concentration of BiOBr on the formation of BiVO4/BiOBr nanocomposite was studied. BiVO4/BiOBr nanocomposite was characterized in detail and the results show that the BiVO4 and BiOBr co-present in the system and BiVO4/BiOBr nanocomposite has a well hydrophilic surface. The photocatalytic properties of such nanocomposite were investigated through studying the degradation of a pollutant model (RhB), and meanwhile, the recombination of electron and hole was evaluated by photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. The results reveal that incorporation of BiOBr on BiVO4 could contribute to the enhanced separation and transport of photoinduced electrons and hole, leading to improved photocatalysis performance. The BiVO4/BiOBr photocatalyst could be applied as an outstanding photocatalytic material for organic pollutants degradation.

Graphical abstract


Photocatalyst Band alignment BiVO4 BiOBr Chemical transformation Nanostructured catalysts Pollution remediation 


Funding information

This work was financially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (51872014), Recruitment Program of Global Experts, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abdi FF, Firet N, van de Krol R (2013) Efficient BiVO4 thin film photoanodes modified with cobalt phosphate catalyst and W-doping. Chemcatchem 5:490–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed T, Zhang HL, Gao YY, Xu HB, Zhang Y (2018) Surfactant-free synthesis of m-BiVO4 nanoribbons and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic properties. Mater Res Bull 99:298–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao J, Xu BY, Luo BD, Lin HL, Chen SF (2011) Novel BiOI/BiOBr heterojunction photocatalysts with enhanced visible light photocatalytic properties. Catal Commun 13:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang XF, Huang J, Cheng C, Sui Q, Sha W, Ji GB, Deng SB, Yu G (2010) BiOX (X=Cl, Br, I) photocatalysts prepared using NaBiO3 as the Bi source: characterization and catalytic performance. Catal Commun 11:460–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chatchai P, Kishioka S, Murakami Y, Nosaka AY, Nosaka Y (2010) Enhanced photoelectrocatalytic activity of FTO/WO3/BiVO4 electrode modified with gold nanoparticles for water oxidation under visible light irradiation. Electrochim Acta 55:592–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng HF, Huang BB, Dai Y (2014) Engineering BiOX (X = Cl, Br, I) nanostructures for highly efficient photocatalytic applications. Nanoscale 6:2009–2026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duan F, Wang XF, Tan TT, Chen MQ (2016) Highly exposed surface area of {001} facets dominated BiOBr nanosheets with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:6113–6121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu J, Jing X, Zhai L, Guo J, Lu K, Mao L (2019) BiOCl facilitated photocatalytic degradation of atenolol from water: reaction kinetics, pathways and products. Chemosphere 220:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huo YN, Zhang J, Miao M, Jin Y (2012) Solvothermal synthesis of flower-like BiOBr microspheres with highly visible-light photocatalytic performances. Appl Catal B Environ 111–112:334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ji YX, Cao JF, Jiang LQ, Zhang YH, Yi ZG (2014) G-C3N4/BiVO4 composites with enhanced and stable visible light photocatalytic activity. J Alloys Compd 590:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kudo A, Miseki Y (2009) Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 38:253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kudo A, Omori K, Kato H (1999) A novel aqueous process for preparation of crystal form-controlled and highly crystalline BiVO4 powder from layered vanadates at room temperature and its photocatalytic and photophysical properties. J Am Chem Soc 121:11459–11467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kudo A, Ueda K, Kato H, Mikami I (1998) Photocatalytic O2 evolution under visible light irradiation on BiVO4 in aqueous AgNO3 solution. Catal Lett 53:229–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li CJ, Zhang P, Lv R, Lu JW, Wang T, Wang SP, Wang HF, Gong JL (2013a) Selective deposition of Ag3PO4 on monoclinic BiVO4(040) for highly efficient photocatalysis. Small 9:3950–3950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li R, Zhang F, Wang D, Yang J, Li M, Zhu J, Zhou X, Han H, Li C (2013b) Spatial separation of photogenerated electrons and holes among {010} and {110} crystal facets of BiVO4. Nat Commun 4:1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li RG, Han HX, Zhang FX, Wang DE, Li C (2014) Highly efficient photocatalysts constructed by rational assembly of dual-cocatalysts separately on different facets of BiVO4. Energy Environ Sci 7:1369–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Negishi R, Naya S-I, Tada H (2015) Visible light-driven selective aerobic oxidation of benzylalcohols to benzaldehydes by a Cu(acac)2-BiVO4-admicelle three-component heterosupramolecular photocatalyst. J Phys Chem C 119:11771–11776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saison T, Chemin N, Chanéac C, Durupthy O, Ruaux VR, Mariey L, Maugé FO, Beaunier P, Jolivet J-P (2011) Bi2O3, BiVO4, and Bi2WO6: impact of surface properties on photocatalytic activity under visible light. J Phys Chem C 115:5657–5666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shan LW, Liu YT, Bi JJ, Suriyaprakash J, Han ZD (2017) Enhanced photocatalytic activity with a heterojunction between BiVO4 and BiOI. J Alloys Compd 721:784–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shan LW, Liu YT, Suriyaprakash J, Ma CG, Wu Z, Dong LM, Zhu LL (2016) Highly efficient photocatalytic activities, band alignment of BiVO4/BiOCl {001} prepared by in situ chemical transformation. J Mol Catal A Chem 411:179–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shan LW, Mi JB, Dong LM, Han ZD, Liu B (2014) Enhanced photocatalytic properties of silver oxide loaded bismuth vanadate. Chin J Chem Eng 22:909–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shan LW, Wang GL, Liu LZ, Wu Z (2015a) Band alignment and enhanced photocatalytic activation for α-Bi2O3/BiOCl (001) core–shell heterojunction. J Mol Catal A Chem 406:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shan LW, Wang GL, Suriyaprakash J, Li D, Liu LZ, Dong LM (2015b) Solar light driven pure water splitting of B-doped BiVO4 synthesized via a sol–gel method. J Alloys Compd 636:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun JY, Guo YP, Wang Y, Cao D, Tian SC, Xiao K, Mao R, Zhao X (2018) H2O2 assisted photoelectrocatalytic degradation of diclofenac sodium at g-C3N4/BiVO4 photoanode under visible light irradiation. Chem Eng J 332:312–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sun SM, Wang WZ, Li DZ, Zhang L, Jiang D (2014) Solar light driven pure water splitting on quantum sized BiVO4 without any cocatalyst. ACS Catal 10:3498–3503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tang JW, Zou ZG, Ye JH (2003) Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of AgInW2O8. J Phys Chem B 107:14265–14269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thalluri SM, Martinez Suarez C, Hernández S, Bensaid S, Saracco G, Russo N (2014) Elucidation of important parameters of BiVO4 responsible for photo-catalytic O2 evolution and insights about the rate of the catalytic process. Chem Eng J 245:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thalluri SM, Martinez Suarez C, Hussain M, Hernandez S, Virga A, Saracco G, Russo N (2013) Evaluation of the parameters affecting the visible-light-induced photocatalytic activity of monoclinic BiVO4 for water oxidation. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:17414–17418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tokunaga S, Kato H, Kudo A (2001) Selective preparation of monoclinic and tetragonal BiVO4 with scheelite structure and their photocatalytic properties. Chem Mater 13:4624–4628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Veldurthi NK, Eswar NK, Singh SA, Madras G (2018) Cocatalyst free Z-schematic enhanced H2 evolution over LaVO4/BiVO4 composite photocatalyst using Ag as an electron mediator. Appl Catal B Environ 220:512–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walsh A, Payne DJ, Egdell RG, Watson GW (2011) Stereochemistry of post-transition metal oxides: revision of the classical lone pair model. Chem Soc Rev 40:4455–4463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang S, Chen P, Bai Y, Yun J-H, Liu G, Wang L (2018) New BiVO4 dual photoanodes with enriched oxygen vacancies for efficient solar-driven water splitting. Adv Mater 30:1800486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang X, Fan HQ, Ren PR (2013) Electrospinning derived hollow SnO2 microtubes with highly photocatalytic property. Catal Commun 31:37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xiao X, Hao R, Liang M, Zuo XX, Nan JM, Li LS, Zhang WD (2012) One-pot solvothermal synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) BiOI/BiOCl composites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activities for the degradation of bisphenol-A. J Hazard Mater 233-234:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiong ZG, Wu H, Zhang LH, Gu Y, Zhao XS (2014) Synthesis of TiO2 with controllable ratio of anatase to rutile. J Mater Chem A 2:9291–9297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Xiong ZG, Zhao XS (2012) Nitrogen-doped titanate-anatase core-shell nanobelts with exposed {101} anatase facets and enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. J Am Chem Soc 134:5754–5757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xu HY, Prasad M, He XL, Shan LW, Qi SY (2009) Discoloration of Rhodamine B dyeing wastewater by schorl-catalyzed Fenton-like reaction. Sci China Ser E 52:3054–3060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yan T, Yan Q, Wang XD, Liu HY, Li MM, Lu SX, Xu WG, Sun M (2015) Facile fabrication of heterostructured g-C3N4/Bi2MoO6 microspheres with highly efficient activity under visible light irradiation. Dalton Trans 44:1601–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang L, Xiong YL, Guo WL, Guo JN, Gao D, Zhang YH, Xiao P (2017) Mo6+ doped BiVO4 with improved charge separation and oxidation kinetics for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Electrochim Acta 256:268–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang L, Xu C, Wan FC, He HH, Gu HS, Xiong J (2019) Synthesis of RGO/BiOI/ZnO composites with efficient photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) under visible-light irradiation. Mater Res Bull 112:154–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang YQ, Sun CH, Wang LZ, Liu ZB, Liu G, Ma XL, Cheng HM (2014) Constructing a metallic/semiconducting TaB2/Ta2O5 core/shell heterostructure for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv Energy Mater 4:1400057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang J, Xia JX, Yin S, Li HM, Xu H, He MQ, Huang LY, Zhang Q (2013b) Improvement of visible light photocatalytic activity over flower-like BiOCl/BiOBr microspheres synthesized by reactable ionic liquids. Colloid Surface A 420:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhang YN, Fan HQ, Li MM, Tian HL (2013a) Ag/BiPO4 heterostructures: synthesis, characterization and their enhanced photocatalytic properties. Dalton Trans 42:13172–13178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zou XW, Fan HQ, Tian YM, Yan SJ (2014) Synthesis of Cu2O/ZnO hetero-nanorod arrays with enhanced visible light-driven photocatalytic activity. CrystEngComm 16:1149–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Materials Science and EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.School of Materials Science and EngineeringHarbin University of Science and TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations