Advertisement

Low-temperature synthesis and sunlight-catalytic performance of flower-like hierarchical graphene oxide/ZnO macrosphere

  • Wei Mei
  • Min Lin
  • Chuansheng ChenEmail author
  • Yongxiang Yan
  • Liangwu Lin
Research Paper
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

A flower-like hierarchical graphene oxide/ZnO (GO/ZnO) macrospheres were fabricated via a low-temperature hydrothemal method, and their photocatalytic performance was tested under natural sunlight and darkness. The resultant GO/ZnO sample displays unique hierarchical macrosphere with diameters in the range of 2–3 μm. The photocatalytic activity of the GO/ZnO microspheres depended on GO, and GO/ZnO macrosphere containing 0.37% GO exhibited very high photocatalytic activity under natural sunlight irradiation and without stirring. Furthermore, GO/ZnO macrospheres possessed good photocatalytic activity under darkness, in which its removal rate of RhB is approximately 5.5 times as many as pure ZnO macrospheres. The enhancement in photocatalytic activity originates from the superior electrical properties of GO, facilitating to transfer the photogenerated electrons and decrease the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers.

Keywords

ZnO macrosphere Graphene oxide Hierarchical structure Photocatalytic performance Nanostructured catalysts 

Notes

Funding information

This work is supported by the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 2018JJ2037 and 14JJ2077) and Science and Technology Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2016SK2021).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11051_2018_4392_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOC 1307 kb)

References

  1. Beura R, Thangadurai P (2017) Structural, optical and photocatalytic properties of graphene-ZnO nanocomposites for varied compositions. J Phys Chem Solids 102:168–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai X, Sun C, Liu D, Luo X, Li D, Wang J, Wang N, Chang X, Zong R, Zhu Y (2017) Photocatalytic degradation of deoxynivalenol using graphene/ZnO hybrids in aqueous suspension. Appl Catal B-Environ 204:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen CS, Cao S, Long H, Qian G, Tsang Y, Gong L, Yu W, Xiao Y (2015) Highly efficient photocatalytic performance of graphene oxide/TiO2-Bi2O3 hybrid coating for organic dyes and NO gas. J Mater Sci-Mater El 26:3385–3391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen CS, Liu TG, Lin LW, Xie XD, Chen XH, Liu QC, Liang B, YU WW (2013) Multi-walled carbon nanotube supported metal-doped ZnO nanoparticles and their photocatalytic property. J Nanopart Res 15(1):1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung TF, Zapien JA, Lee ST (2008) Luminescent properties of ZnO nanorod arrays grown on Al: ZnO buffer layer. J Phys Chem C 112(3):820–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen CS, Yu WW, Liu TG, Cao SY, Tsang Y (2017) Graphene oxide/WS2/mg-doped ZnO nanocomposites for solar-light catalytic and anti-bacterial applications. Sol Energ Mat Solar Cells 160:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao SY, Liu TG, Tsang Y, Chen CS (2016) Role of hydroxylation modification on the structure and property of reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 hybrids. Appl Surf Sci 382:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Faisal M, Ibrahim AA, Harraz FA, Bouzid H, Al-Assiri MS, Ismail AA (2015) SnO2 doped ZnO nanostructures for highly efficient photocatalyst. J Mol Catal A-Chem 397:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. György E, Logofatu C, Del ÁP, Datcu A, Pascu O, Ivan R (2018) Enhanced UV-and visible-light driven photocatalytic performances and recycling properties of graphene oxide/ZnO hybrid layers. Ceram Int 44(2):1826–1835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He W, Kim HK, Wamer WG, Melka D, Callahan JH, Yin JJ (2013) Photogenerated charge carriers and reactive oxygen species in ZnO/au hybrid nanostructures with enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J Am Chem Soc 136(2):750–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herring NP, AbouZeid K, Mohamed MB, Pinsk J, El-Shall MS (2011) Formation mechanisms of gold–zinc oxide hexagonal nanopyramids by heterogeneous nucleation using microwave synthesis. Langmuir 27(24):15146–15154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Han C, Chen Z, Zhang N, Colmenares JC, Xu YJ (2015) Hierarchically CdS decorated 1D ZnO Nanorods-2D graphene hybrids: low temperature synthesis and enhanced photocatalytic performance. Adv Funct Mater 25(2):221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinhold R, Kim HS, Schmidt F, Grundmann M, Mendelsberg RJ, Allen MW (2012) Optical and defect properties of hydrothermal ZnO with low lithium contamination. Appl Phys Lett 101(6):062105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jo WK, Kumar S, Isaacs MA, Lee AF, Karthikeyan S (2017) Cobalt promoted TiO2/GO for the photocatalytic degradation of oxytetracycline and Congo red. Appl Catal B-Environ 201:159–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar V, Singh F, Ntwaeaborwa OM, Swart HC (2013) Effect of Br+6 ions on the structural, morphological and luminescent properties of ZnO/Si thin films. Appl Surf Sci 279:472–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lv X, Du Y, Li Z, Chen Z, Yang K, Liu T, Zhu CF, Du XM, Feng Y (2017) High photocatalytic property and crystal growth of spindle-like ZnO microparticles synthesized by one-step hydrothermal method. Vacuum 144:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lee KM, Lai CW, Ngai KS, Juan JC (2016) Recent developments of zinc oxide based photocatalyst in water treatment technology: a review. Water Res 88:428–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li N, Zhang J, Tian Y, Zhao J, Zhang J, Zuo W (2017) Precisely controlled fabrication of magnetic 3D γ-Fe2O3@ ZnO core-shell photocatalyst with enhanced activity: ciprofloxacin degradation and mechanism insight. Chem Eng J 308:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Q, Guo B, Yu J, Ran J, Zhang B, Yan H, Gong JR (2011) Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS-cluster-decorated graphene nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc 133(28):10878–10884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li B, Liu T, Wang Y, Wang Z (2012) ZnO/graphene-oxide nanocomposite with remarkably enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance. J Colloid Interface Sci 377(1):114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li Q, Wang E, Li S, Wang C, Tian C, Sun G, Gu JM, Xu R (2009) Template-free polyoxometalate-assisted synthesis for ZnO hollow spheres. J Solid State Chem 182(5):1149–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mei W, Chen CS, Chen XA, Liu XY, Yang Z, Ding F, Chao ZS, Liu TG (2018) Low-temperature construction of MoS2 quantum dots/ZnO spheres and their photocatalytic activity under natural sunlight. J Colloid Interface Sci 530:714–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Podporska-Carroll J, Myles A, Quilty B, McCormack DE, Fagan R, Hinder SJ, Hinder SJ, Dionysiou DD, Pillai SC (2017) Antibacterial properties of F-doped ZnO visible light photocatalyst. J Hazard Mater 324:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prasad N, Karthikeyan B (2017) Cu-doping and annealing effect on the optical properties and enhanced photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanoparticles. Vacuum 146:501–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qi K, Cheng B, Yu J, Ho W (2017) Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J Alloys Compd 727:792–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ravichandran K, Uma R, Sriram S, Balamurgan D (2017) Fabrication of ZnO: ag/GO composite thin films for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int 43(13):10041–10051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raccichini R, Varzi A, Passerini S, Scrosati B (2015) The role of graphene for electrochemical energy storage. Nat Mater 14(3):271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rokhsat E, Akhavan O (2016) Improving the photocatalytic activity of graphene oxide/ZnO nanorod films by UV irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 371:590–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schelonka D, Slušná M, Tolasz J, Popelková D, Ecorchard P (2016) ZnO-GO composite with for photocatalytic applications. Mater Today 3(8):2679–2687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shen L, Bao N, Yanagisawa K, Gupta A, Domen K, Grimes CA (2007) Controlled synthesis and assembly of nanostructured ZnO architectures by a solvothermal soft chemistry process. Cryst Growth Des 7(12):2742–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shima H, Hossain MM, Lee I, Son S, Hahn JR (2017) Carbon-ZnO core-shell nanospheres: facile fabrication and application in the visible-light photocatalytic decomposition of organic pollutant dyes. Mater Chem Phys 185:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Selvin SSP, Radhika N, Borang O, Lydia IS, Merlin JP (2017) Visible light driven photodegradation of rhodamine B using cysteine capped ZnO/GO nanocomposite as photocatalyst. J Mater Sci-Mater Elec 28(9):6722–6730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang YB, Lee CS, Xu J, Liu ZT, Chen ZH, He Z, Luo L (2010) Incorporation of graphenes in nanostructured TiO2 films via molecular grafting for dye-sensitized solar cell application. ACS Nano 4(6):3482–3488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Türkyılmaz ŞŞ, Güy N, Özacar M (2017) Photocatalytic efficiencies of Ni, Mn, Fe and ag doped ZnO nanostructures synthesized by hydrothermal method: the synergistic/antagonistic effect between ZnO and metals. J Photoch Phoyobio A 341:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thuan DV, Nguyen TK, Kim SW, Chung JS, Hur SH, Kim EJ, Hahn SH, Wang M (2017) Chemical-hydrothermal synthesis of oval-shaped graphene/ZnO quantum hybrids and their photocatalytic performances. Catal Commun 101:102–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tayyebi A, Tayebi M, Shafikhani A, Şengör SS (2016) ZnO quantum dots-graphene composites: formation mechanism and enhanced photocatalytic activity for degradation of methyl orange dye. J Alloys Compd 663:738–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weng B, Yang MQ, Zhang N, Xu YJ (2014) Toward the enhanced photoactivity and photostability of ZnO nanospheres via intimate surface coating with reduced graphene oxide. J Mater Chem A 2(24):9380–9389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang X, Wang X, Song J, Li P, Ryou JH, Dupuis RD, Wang ZL (2005) Growth of uniformly aligned ZnO nanowire heterojunction arrays on GaN, AlN, and Al0.5Ga0.5N substrates. J Am Chem Soc 127(21):7920–7923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Xu X, Wu T, Xia F, Li Y, Zhang C, Zhang L, Chen MZ, Li XC, Zhang L, Zhang L, Liu Y, Gao J (2014) Redox reaction between graphene oxide and in powder to prepare In2O3/reduced graphene oxide hybrids for supercapacitors. J Power Sources 266:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiao Y, Chen C, Cao S, Qian GP, Nie XB, Yu W (2015) Enhanced sunlight-driven photocatalytic activity of graphene oxide/Bi2WO6 nanoplates by silicon modification. Ceram Int 41:10087–10094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yu B, Wang F, Dong W, Hou J, Lu P, Gong J (2015) Self-template synthesis of core–shell ZnO@ ZIF-8 nanospheres and the photocatalysis under UV irradiation. Mater Lett 156:50–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yang C, Li Q, Tang L, Xin K, Bai A, Yu Y (2015) Synthesis, photocatalytic activity, and photogenerated hydroxyl radicals of monodisperse colloidal ZnO nanospheres. Appl Surf Sci 357:1928–1938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yu WW, Liu TG, Cao SY, Wang C, Chen CS (2016) Constructing MnO2/single crystalline ZnO nanorod hybrids with enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J Solid State Chem 239:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yumitori S (2000) Correlation of C1s chemical state intensities with the O1s intensity in the XPS analysis of anodically oxidized glass-like carbon samples. J Mater Sci 35(1):139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yu W, Chen XA, Mei W, Chen C, Tsang Y (2017) Photocatalytic and electrochemical performance of three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide/WS2/mg-doped ZnO composites. Appl Surf Sci 400:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yan D, Xu X, Lu T, Hu B, Chua DH, Pan L (2016) Reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotubes sponge: a new high capacity and long life anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J Power Sources 316:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang R, Xie J, Wang C, Liu J, Zheng X, Li Y, Yang XY, Wang HE, Su BL (2017) Macroporous ZnO/ZnS/CdS composite spheres as efficient and stable photocatalysts for solar-driven hydrogen generation. J Mater Sci 52(19):11124–11134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang DF, Sun LD, Zhang J, Yan ZG, Yan CH (2008) Hierarchical construction of ZnO architectures promoted by heterogeneous nucleation. Cryst Growth Des 8(10):3609–3615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang N, Yang MQ, Tang ZR, Xu YJ (2013) Toward improving the graphene–semiconductor composite photoactivity via the addition of metal ions as generic interfacial mediator. ACS Nano 8(1):623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhu J, Yang D, Yin Z, Yan Q, Zhang H (2014) Graphene and graphene-based materials for energy storage applications. Small 10(17):3480–3498CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringChangsha University of Science and TechnologyChangshaChina
  2. 2.Science and Technology on High Strength structural Materials LaboratoryCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations