Electrochemical water splitting using nano-zeolite Y supported tungsten oxide electrocatalysts

  • Shaheen Fatima Anis
  • Raed HashaikehEmail author
Research Paper


Zeolites are often used as supports for metals and metal oxides because of their well-defined microporous structure and high surface area. In this study, nano-zeolite Y (50–150 nm range) and micro-zeolite Y (500–800 nm range) were loaded with WO3, by impregnating the zeolite support with ammonium metatungstate and thermally decomposing the salt thereafter. Two different loadings of WO3 were studied, 3 wt.% and 5 wt.% with respect to the overall catalyst. The prepared catalysts were characterized for their morphology, structure, and surface areas through scanning electron microscope (SEM), XRD, and BET. They were further compared for their electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) in 0.5 M H2SO4. On comparing the bare micro-zeolite particles with the nano-form, the nano-zeolite Y showed higher currents with comparable overpotentials and lower Tafel slope of 62.36 mV/dec. WO3 loading brought about a change in the electrocatalytic properties of the catalyst. The overpotentials and Tafel slopes were observed to decrease with zeolite-3 wt.% WO3. The smallest overpotential of 60 mV and Tafel slope of 31.9 mV/dec was registered for nano-zeolite with 3 wt.% WO3, while the micro-zeolite gave an overpotential of 370 mV and a Tafel slope of 98.1 mV/dec. It was concluded that even with the same metal oxide loading, nano-zeolite showed superior performance, which is attributed to its size and hence easier escape of hydrogen bubbles from the catalyst.


Nano-zeolite Y Tungsten oxide Hydrogen evolution reaction Nanostructured catalysts 



The authors would like to acknowledge the ADNOC Refining Research Centre (ARRC), Abu Dhabi, for partially funding this work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material


(MP4 3378 kb).


(MP4 1346 kb).


  1. Anis, S. F., & Hashaikeh, R. (2016). Electrospun zeolite-Y fibers: fabrication and morphology analysis. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 233(Supplement C), 78-86Google Scholar
  2. Anis SF, Khalil A, Singaravel G, Hashaikeh R (2016) A review on the fabrication of zeolite and mesoporous inorganic nanofibers formation for catalytic applications. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 236:176–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anis SF, Lalia BS, Mostafa AO, Hashaikeh R (2017a) Electrospun nickel–tungsten oxide composite fibers as active electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Sci 52(12):7269–7281. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anis SF, Lalia BS, Palmisano G, Hashaikeh R (2018) Photoelectrochemical activity of electrospun WO3/NiWO4 nanofibers under visible light irradiation. J Mater Sci 53(3):2208–2220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anis SF, Singaravel G, Hashaikeh R (2017b) Electropsun Ni-W/zeolite composite fibers for n-heptane hydrocracking and hydroisomerization. Mater Chem Phys 200:146–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chekin F, Bagherib S, Hamidb SBA (2013) Synthesis of tungsten oxide nanorods by the controlling precipitation reaction: application for hydrogen evolution reaction on a WO3 nanorods/carbon nanotubes composite film modified electrode. J Chin Chem Soc 60:447–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng H, Reinhard M (2006) Sorption of trichloroethylene in hydrophobic micropores of dealuminated Y zeolites and natural minerals. Environ Sci Technol 40(24):7694–7701. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chica A (2013) Zeolites: promised materials for the sustainable production of hydrogen. ISRN Chem Eng 2013(19):1–19. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruciani G (2006) Zeolites upon heating: factors governing their thermal stability and structural changes. J Phys Chem Solids 67(9–10):1973–1994. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubey N, Labhsetwar NK, Devotta S, Rayalu SS (2007) Hydrogen evolution by water splitting using novel composite zeolite-based photocatalyst. Catal Today 129(3):428–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fox MA, Pettit TL (1989) Photoactivity of zeolite-supported cadmium sulfide: hydrogen evolution in the presence of sacrificial donors. Langmuir 5(4):1056–1061. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. García EJ, Pérez-Pellitero J, Pirngruber GD, Jallut C, Palomino M, Rey F, Valencia S (2014) Tuning the adsorption properties of zeolites as adsorbents for CO2 separation: best compromise between the working capacity and selectivity. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(23):9860–9874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gong M, Zhou W, Tsai M-C, Zhou J, Guan M, Lin M-C et al (2014) Nanoscale nickel oxide/nickel heterostructures for active hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Nat Commun 5:4695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jensen NK, Rufford TE, Watson G, Zhang DK, Chan KI, May EF (2011) Screening zeolites for gas separation applications involving methane, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide. J Chem Eng Data 57(1):106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kadyk, T., Bruce, D., & Eikerling, M. (2016). How to enhance gas removal from porous electrodes?, 6, 38780. doi:
  16. Lalia BS, Ahmed FE, Shah T, Hilal N, Hashaikeh R (2015a) Electrically conductive membranes based on carbon nanostructures for self-cleaning of biofouling. Desalination 360:8–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lalia BS, Khalil A, Shah T, Hashaikeh R (2015b) Flexible carbon nanostructures with electrospun nickel oxide as a lithium-ion battery anode. Ionics 21(10):2755–2762. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lalia BS, Shah T, Hashaikeh R (2015c) Microbundles of carbon nanostructures as binder free highly conductive matrix for LiFePO4 battery cathode. J Power Sources 278:314–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li M (2007) Peak oil, the rise of China and India, and the global energy crisis. J Contemp Asia 37(4):449–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li YH, Liu PF, Pan LF, Wang HF, Yang ZZ, Zheng LR et al (2015) Local atomic structure modulations activate metal oxide as electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution in acidic water. Nat Commun 6(6):8064. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin Y, Liu M, Pan Y, Zhang J (2017) Porous Co–Mo phosphide nanotubes: an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. J Mater Sci 52(17):10406–10417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu J, Jiang G, Liu Y, Di J, Wang Y, Zhao Z et al (2014) Hierarchical macro-meso-microporous ZSM-5 zeolite hollow fibers with highly efficient catalytic cracking capability. Sci Rep 4Google Scholar
  23. Luo Z, Miao R, Huan TD, Mosa IM, Poyraz AS, Zhong W et al (2016) Mesoporous MoO3–x material as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reactions. Adv Energy Mater 6(16)Google Scholar
  24. Meng Z-D, Zhu L, Choi J-G, Park C-Y, Oh W-C (2011) Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic behavior of WO3-fullerene/TiO2 catalysts under visible light. Nanoscale Res Lett 6(1):459. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mentus S, Mojovic Z, Cvjeticanin N, Tesic Z (2003) Hydrogen evolution on zeolite supported platinum clusters. Fuel Cells 3(1–2):15–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mentus S, Mojovic Z, Cvjeticanin N, Tesic Z (2004) Electrochemical water splitting on zeolite supported platinum clusters. J New Mater Electrochem Syst 7(3):213–220. Google Scholar
  27. Momirlan M, Birjega R (1997) Structure of zeolites used in hydrogen evolution from water. Int J Hydrog Energy 22(12):1133–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rajeswari J, Kishore P, Viswanathan B, Varadarajan T (2007) Facile hydrogen evolution reaction on WO3 nanorods. Nanoscale Res Lett 2(10):496–503. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shevade S, Ford RG (2004) Use of synthetic zeolites for arsenate removal from pollutant water. Water Res 38(14):3197–3204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. T.K. Shah, Basantkumar, H. Liu, C. A. Fleischer, J.J. Sedlak, J.M. Patel, W.P. Burgess, J.M. (2013)Google Scholar
  31. Wang N, Sun Q, Bai R, Li X, Guo G, Yu J (2016) In situ confinement of ultrasmall Pd clusters within nanosized silicalite-1 zeolite for highly efficient catalysis of hydrogen generation. J Am Chem Soc 138(24):7484–7487. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yan X, Tian L, Chen X (2015) Crystalline/amorphous Ni/NiO core/shell nanosheets as highly active electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. J Power Sources 300:336–343. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yue P, Khan F (1991) Methods for increasing photo-assisted production of hydrogen over titanium exchanged zeolites. Int J Hydrog Energy 16(9):609–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang B, Zhu H, Zou M, Liu X, Yang H, Zhang M et al (2017) Design and fabrication of size-controlled Pt–Au bimetallic alloy nanostructure in carbon nanofibers: a bifunctional material for biosensors and the hydrogen evolution reaction. J Mater Sci 52(13):8207–8218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang D, Zeng K (2012) Evaluating the behavior of electrolytic gas bubbles and their effect on the cell voltage in alkaline water electrolysis. Ind Eng Chem Res 51(42):13825–13832. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zheng H, Mathe M (2011) Hydrogen evolution reaction on single crystal WO 3/C nanoparticles supported on carbon in acid and alkaline solution. Int J Hydrog Energy 36(3):1960–1964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhuman B (2017) Thesis: the use of carbon nanostructures as a binding material for zeolite particles and the evaluation of their catalytic performance. (MSc), Masdar Institute of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, UAEGoogle Scholar
  38. Zou S, Liu J, Kobayashi H, Chen C, Qiao P, Li R et al (2017) Boosting hydrogen evolution activities by strong interfacial electronic interaction in ZnO@ Bi (NO3) 3 core–shell structures. J Phys Chem C 121(8):4343–4351CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemical Engineering DepartmentKhalifa University of Science and Technology, Masdar InstituteMasdar CityUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations