Advertisement

Natural Language Semantics

, Volume 26, Issue 3–4, pp 281–335 | Cite as

The good, the ‘not good’, and the ‘not pretty’: negation in the negative predicates of Tlingit

  • Seth CableEmail author
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

This paper develops and defends a semantic/syntactic analysis of a curious set of negative gradable predicates in the Tlingit language, and shows that the analysis has some important consequences concerning the range of crosslinguistic variation in degree constructions. In Tlingit, certain negative gradable predicates are formed by negating a positive root and then applying an additional morphological operation: e.g. k’éi ‘good’, tlél ukʼé ‘not good’, tlél ushké ‘bad’. I show that (i) the negation in forms like tlél ushké ‘bad’ is VP-external, clausal negation, and is not an incorporated negation like English un-; and (ii) the meaning of these forms is indeed that of a gradable negative predicate, rather than the propositional negation of the positive predicate (cf. tlél ukʼé ‘not good’). Under the proposed analysis, the additional morphological operation observed in these forms is the reflex of a special degree relativizer, one that must undergo movement to Spec-NegP. In addition, Tlingit differs from English and other languages in that degree operators—like POS and comparative operators—can be attached high in the clause, above sentential negation. In addition to capturing various facts concerning these negative predicates, the proposed analysis raises some novel puzzles concerning intervention effects in the movement of degree operators, and provides support for the view that negative predicates like bad are morphosyntactically derived from positive predicates like good.

Keywords

Gradable predicates Degree semantics Degree movement Cross-polar nomalies Intervention effects Tlingit 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, and Paula Menéndez-Benito. 2015. Epistemic indefinites: An overview. In Epistemic indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal domain, ed. Luis Alonso-Ovalle and Paula Menéndez-Benito, 1–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alrenga, Peter, and Christopher Kennedy. 2014. No more shall we part: Quantifiers in English comparatives. Natural Language Semantics 22: 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baglini, Rebekah. 2015. Stative predication and semantic ontology: A cross-linguistic study. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Quantified structures as barriers for LF-movement. Natural Language Semantics 4: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14: 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, Sigrid. 2012. DegP scope revisited. Natural Language Semantics 20: 227–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth. 2013. Decomposing notions of adjectival transitivity in Navajo. Natural Language Semantics 21 (3): 277–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Büring, Daniel. 2007a. Cross-polar nomalies. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, ed. T. Friedman and M. Gibson, 37–52. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Büring, Daniel. 2007b. More or less. In Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 43, No. 2, 3–17. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cresswell, M.J. 1976. The semantics of degree. In Montague grammar, ed. Barbara Partee, 261–292. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer. 1987. Classics of Tlingit oral literature, Volume 1: Haa Shuká, Our ancestors: Tlingit oral narratives. Juneau, AK: Sealaska Heritage Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  13. De Clercq, Karen, and Guido Wyngaerd. 2017. Why Affixal Negation is Syntactic. In Proceedings of the 34th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. A. Kaplan, A. Kaplan, M. McCarvel, E. Rubin, 151–158. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
  14. Eggleston, Keri. 2013. 575 Tlingit verbs: A study of Tlingit verb paradigms. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  15. Francez, Itamar, and Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2017. Semantics and morphosyntactic variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from Building 20, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Heim, Irene. 2001. Degree operators and scope. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 10, ed. Brendan Jackson and Tanya Matthews, 40–64. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Heim, Irene. 2006. Little. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 16, ed. Masayuki Gibson and Jonathan Howell, 35–58. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Heim, Irene. 2008. Decomposing antonyms? In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, ed. Atle Grønn, 212–225. Oslo: ILOS.Google Scholar
  20. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Kari, James. 1992. Some concepts in Ahtna Athabaskan word formation. In Morphology now, ed. Mark Aronoff, 107–132. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kennedy, Christopher. 1997. Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  23. Kennedy, Christopher. 2009. Modes of comparison. In Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 43, No. 1, 141–165. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
  24. Kennedy, Christopher, and Beth Levin. 2008. Measure of Change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, ed. Louise McNalley and Christopher Kennedy, 156–182. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, and Itamar Francez. 2010. Possessed properties in Ulwa. Natural Language Semantics 18: 197–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kroeger, Paul. 2014. External negation in Malay/Indonesian. Language 90 (1): 137–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leer, Jeff. 1991. The schetic categories of the Tlingit verb. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Leer, Jeff, James Kari, and Ben Potter. 2010. The Dene-Yeniseian connection (Anthropological papers of the University of Alaska 5). Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
  29. Matthewson, Lisa. 2004. On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics 70 (4): 369–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The languages of native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Morzycki, Marcin. 2011. Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. Natural Language Semantics 19 (1): 39–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rett, Jessica. 2015. The semantics of evaluativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Romero, Maribel. 2016. POS, -est, and reverse readings of many and most. In Proceedings of NELS 46, ed. Christopher Hammerly and Brandon Prickett, 141–154. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
  36. Rullmann, Hotze. 1995. Maximality in the semantics of wh-constructions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  37. Schwarzschild, Roger, and Karina Wilkinson. 2002. Quantifiers in comparatives: A semantics of degree based on intervals. Natural Language Semantics 10: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Twitchell, X̱ʼunei Lance. 2018. Haa Dachx̱ánx'i Sáani Kagéiyi Yís: Haa Yoo X̱ʼatángi Kei Naltseen (For Our Little Grandchildren: Language Revitalization Among the Tlingit). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawaiʼi at Hilo.Google Scholar
  39. von Stechow, Arnim. 2009. The temporal degree adjectives früh(er)/spät(er) ‘early(er)’/‘late(r)’ and the semantics of the positive. In Quantification, definiteness, and nominalization, ed. Anastasia Giannakidou and Monika Rathert, 214–233. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Integrative Learning CenterAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations