A regularized approach for frictional impact dynamics of flexible multi-link manipulator arms considering the dynamic stiffening effect

  • 337 Accesses

  • 2 Citations


The present study offers a regularized approach for multi-link flexible manipulator arms with frictional impacts. The complex risks of global dynamics simulation, which involve nonlinear frictional impact, stick–slip, and foreshortening deformation, as well as multi-scale numerical problems, were implemented. The system is described as an assembly of \(n\) flexible links connected by \(n\) rotary joints. The stretching, bending, and the torsional deformations of the flexible links were considered in addition to the flexibility and mass of the joint. The introduction of a contact force potential energy approach transformed the non-differentiable functions of the normal and tangential frictions into differentiable ones, thereby generating Lagrange equations for the general recursive formulation of the systems. A numerical simulation for the double pendulum and spatial manipulator arms collision with targets was generated, thereby allowing the calculation of the frequent switching between the stick/sliding and forward/backward sliding. Several normal contact and friction models were adopted, and their corresponding results were analyzed. The generated ordinary differential equations of the proposed smoothed algorithm were solved using explicit solvers to verify any improvements in the global computational efficiency of the frictional collision dynamics for the flexible manipulator arms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19


  1. 1.

    Hunter, J.A., Ussher, T.H., Gossain, D.M.: Structural dynamic design considerations of the shuttle remote manipulator system. In: AIAA 23rd SDM Conf. Proc. No. 82-0762 (1982)

  2. 2.

    Piedboeuf, J.C., Doyon, M., L’Archevêque, R., et al.: Simulation Environments for Space Robot Design and Verification. ASTRA (2000)

  3. 3.

    Nguyen, P.K., Ravindran, R., Carr, R., et al.: Structural flexibility of the shuttle remote manipulator system mechanical arm. In: Proceedings of Guidance and Control Conference, pp. 246–256 (1982)

  4. 4.

    Book, W.J.: Recursive Lagrangian dynamics of flexible manipulator arms. Int. J. Robot. Res. 3(3), 87–101 (1984)

  5. 5.

    Subudhi, B., Morris, A.S.: Dynamic modelling, simulation and control of a manipulator with flexible links and joints. Robot. Auton. Syst. 41(4), 257–270 (2002)

  6. 6.

    Kane, T.R., Ryan, R.R., Banerjee, A.K.: Dynamics of a cantilever beam attached to a moving base. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 10(2), 139–151 (1987)

  7. 7.

    Glocker, C.: Energetic consistency conditions for standard impacts. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 29(1), 77–117 (2013)

  8. 8.

    Wu, S.C., Haug, E.J.: Geometric nonlinear substructure for dynamics of flexible mechanical systems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 26(10), 2211–2226 (1988)

  9. 9.

    Mayo, J.M., Garcia-Vallejo, D., Dominguez, J.: Study of the geometric stiffening effect: comparison of different formulations. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 11(4), 321–341 (2004)

  10. 10.

    Ryu, J., Kim, S.S., Kim, S.S.: A criterion on inclusion of stress stiffening effects in flexible multibody dynamic system simulation. Comput. Struct. 62(6), 1035–1048 (1997)

  11. 11.

    Liu, J.Y., Lu, H.: Rigid–flexible coupling dynamics of three dimensional hub-beams system. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 18(4), 487–510 (2007)

  12. 12.

    Chenut, X., Fisette, P., Samin, J.C.: Recursive formalism with a minimal dynamic parameterization for the identification and simulation of multibody systems. Application to the human body. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 8(2), 117–140 (2002)

  13. 13.

    Bauchau, O.A., Bottasso, C.L., Trainelli, L.: Robust integration schemes for flexible multibody systems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 192(3), 395–420 (2003)

  14. 14.

    Geike, T., McPhee, J.: Inverse dynamic analysis of parallel manipulators with full mobility. Mech. Mach. Theory 38(6), 549–562 (2003)

  15. 15.

    Lugrís, U., Naya, M.A., Pérez, J.A., Cuadrado, J.: Implementation and efficiency of two geometric stiffening approaches. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 20(2), 147–161 (2008)

  16. 16.

    Stewart, D.E., Trinkle, J.C.: An implicit time-stepping scheme for rigid body dynamics with inelastic collisions and Coulomb friction. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 39, 2673–2691 (1996)

  17. 17.

    Moreau, J.J.: Quadratic programming in mechanics: dynamics of one-sided constraints. SIAM J. Control 4(1), 153–158 (1966)

  18. 18.

    Khulief, Y.A., Shabana, A.A.: A continuous force model for the impact analysis of flexible multibody systems. Mech. Mach. Theory 22(3), 213–224 (1987)

  19. 19.

    Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: A contact force model with hysteresis damping for impact analysis of multibody systems. J. Mech. Des. 112(3), 369–376 (1990)

  20. 20.

    Wriggers, P., Krstulovic-Opara, L., Korelc, J.: Smooth \(C^{1}\)-interpolations for two-dimensional frictional contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 51(12), 1469–1495 (2001)

  21. 21.

    Glowinski, R., Lions, J.L., Tremoliere, R.: Numerical Analysis of Variational Inequalities. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2011)

  22. 22.

    Martins, J.A.C., Oden, J.T.: A numerical analysis of a class of problems in elastodynamics with friction. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 40(3), 327–360 (1983)

  23. 23.

    Seifried, R., Schiehlen, W., Eberhard, P.: Numerical and experimental evaluation of the coefficient of restitution for repeated impacts. Int. J. Impact Eng. 32(1), 508–524 (2005)

  24. 24.

    Miller, A., Allen, P.K.: Graspit!: a versatile simulator for robotic grasping. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 11(4), 110–122 (2004)

  25. 25.

    Whittaker, E.T.: A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies: With an Introduction to the Problem of Three Bodies. CUP Archive, Cambridge (1970)

  26. 26.

    Kane, T.R.: A dynamics puzzle. Stanf. Mech. Alumni Club Newsl. 6, 1–4 (1984)

  27. 27.

    Brach, R.M.: Mechanical Impact Dynamics, Rigid Body Collisions. Wiley, New York (2007)

  28. 28.

    Stronge, W.J.: Smooth dynamics of oblique impact with friction. Int. J. Impact Eng. 51, 36–49 (2013)

  29. 29.

    Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985)

  30. 30.

    Gonthier, Y., McPhee, J., Lange, C., et al.: A regularized contact model with asymmetric damping and dwell-time dependent friction. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 11(3), 209–233 (2004)

  31. 31.

    Bauchau, O.A., Ju, C.: Modeling friction phenomena in flexible multibody dynamics. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195(50), 6909–6924 (2006)

  32. 32.

    Pereira, C., Ambrósio, J., Ramalho, A.: Implications of contact parameters on the dynamics of chain drives. Key Eng. Mater. 572, 367–370 (2014)

  33. 33.

    Stewart, D.: A high accuracy method for solving ODEs with discontinuous right-hand side. Numer. Math. 58, 299–328 (1990)

  34. 34.

    Hairer, E., Nørsett, S.P., Wanner, G.: Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems, 2nd revised edn. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 8. Springer, Berlin (1991). ISBN 3-540-56670-8

  35. 35.

    Qian, Z.J., Zhang, D.G., Liu, J.: Recursive formulation for dynamic modeling and simulation of multilink spatial flexible robotic manipulators. Adv. Mech. Eng. 2013, 216014 (2013)

  36. 36.

    Hunt, K.H., Crossley, F.R.E.: Coefficient of restitution interpreted as damping in vibroimpact. J. Appl. Mech. 42(2), 440–445 (1975)

  37. 37.

    Flores, P., Machado, M., Silva, M.T., Martins, J.M.: On the continuous contact force models for soft materials in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst. Dyn. 25, 357–375 (2011)

  38. 38.

    Herbert, R.G., McWhannell, D.C.: Shape and frequency composition of pulses from an impact pair. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 99(3), 513–518 (1977)

  39. 39.

    Li, X.S., Fang, S.C.: On the entropic regularization method for solving min–max problems with applications. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 46(1), 119–130 (1997)

  40. 40.

    Flores, P., Ambrósio, J., Claro, J.C.P., et al.: Kinematics and Dynamics of Multibody Systems with Imperfect Joints: Models and Case Studies. Springer, Berlin (2008)

  41. 41.

    Flores, P., Lankarani, H.M.: Dynamic response of multibody systems with multiple clearance joints. J. Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 7(3), 1–13 (2012)

Download references


This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundations of China (No. 11602120), Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China (No. 2013BAD08B02), A Collaboration of the Science and Technology Innovation Projects at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (No. CAAS-XTCX2016006), and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFD0702003).

Author information

Correspondence to Chengqian Jin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, Z., Zhang, D. & Jin, C. A regularized approach for frictional impact dynamics of flexible multi-link manipulator arms considering the dynamic stiffening effect. Multibody Syst Dyn 43, 229–255 (2018) doi:10.1007/s11044-017-9589-0

Download citation


  • Friction
  • Stick-slip
  • Regularized approach
  • Flexible multi-link system
  • Impact dynamics