Developing the multiple stress–strain creep recovery (MS-SCR) test

Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

While most published work from Europe has been concerned with evaluating binders’ resistance to rutting based on their stiffness (deformation resistance), work originating in the US has mainly been concerned with ranking binders based on their recoverability in a multiple stress form. This paper details the design of a new modified multiple stress–strain creep recovery (MS-SCR) test. The test is designed to evaluate binders’ rutting resistance based on two rutting resistance mechanisms: stiffness and recoverability. A preliminary investigation is presented in this paper followed by details of the design of the new modified test. A 40/60 penetration grade bitumen and bitumen-filler mastics prepared with three filler concentrations (35%, 50%, and 65% filler content by mass of mastic) were tested. In addition, two polymer modified bitumens (PMBs) using the same base bitumen type were examined for validation. Two parameters are introduced to characterise the short and long recovery in the new test. In terms of stiffness, the test allows the behaviour of binders at different stress levels and loading cycles to be studied and produces a new parameter that can quantify the degree of modification. Finally, a relationship between nonlinearity and normal force in the test was investigated.

Keywords

Bitumen Rutting Multiple stress creep recovery test 

References

  1. Airey, G.D., Hunter, A.E.: Dynamic mechanical testing of bitumen: sample preparation methods. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers—Transport, pp. 85–92. Thomas Telford Ltd., London (2003) Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., Le Hir, Y., Planche, J.-P., Martin, D., Shenoy, A.: Zero shear viscosity of asphalt binders. Transp. Res. Rec. 1810, 54–62 (2002) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahia, H.U., Hanson, D., Zeng, M., Zhai, H., Khatri, M., Anderson, R.: Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design (2001) Google Scholar
  4. Biro, S., Gandhi, T., Amirkhanian, S.: Determination of zero shear viscosity of warm asphalt binders. Constr. Build. Mater. 23, 2080–2086 (2009) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Angelo, J.: New high-temperature binder specification using multistress creep and recovery. Transp. Res. Circ. E-C147, 1–13 (2010) Google Scholar
  6. D’Angelo, J., Kluttz, R., Dongre, R.N., Stephens, K., Zanzotto, L.: Revision of the superpave high temperature binder specification: the multiple stress creep recovery test (with discussion). J. Assoc. Asph. Paving Technol. 76, 123–162 (2007) Google Scholar
  7. De Visscher, J., Vanelstraete, A.: Practical test methods for measuring the zero shear viscosity of bituminous binders. Mater. Struct. 37, 360–364 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delgadillo, R., Cho, D., Bahia, H.: Part 1: bituminous materials: nonlinearity of repeated creep and recovery binder test and relationship with mixture permanent deformation. Transp. Res. Rec. 1962, 3–11 (2006a) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delgadillo, R., Nam, K., Bahia, H.: Why do we need to change \(\mbox{G}^{*}{/}\sin \delta\) and how? Road Mater, Pavement Des. 7, 7–27 (2006b) Google Scholar
  10. Deshpande, V., Cebon, D.: Steady-state constitutive relationship for idealised asphalt mixes. Mech. Mater. 31, 271–287 (1999) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desmazes, C., Lecomte, M., Lesueur, D., Phillips, M.: A protocol for reliable measurement of zero-shear-viscosity in order to evaluate the anti-rutting performance of binders. In: Proceedings of the Papers Submitted for Review at 2nd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Held 20–22 September 2000, Barcelona, Spain (2000). Book 1—Session 1 Google Scholar
  12. Drakos, C., Roque, R., Birgisson, B.: Effects of measured tire contact stresses on near-surface rutting. Transp. Res. Rec. 1764, 59–69 (2001) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giuliani, F., Merusi, F., Antunes, I.: Creep flow behavior of asphalt rubber binder–the zero shear viscosity analysis. In: Proceedings of the Asphalt Rubber (2006) Google Scholar
  14. Golalipour, A.: Modification of multiple stress creep and recovery test procedure and usage in specification. University of Wisconsin–Madison (2011) Google Scholar
  15. Le Hir, Y., Anderson, D., Plache, J., Martin, D., Partl, M.: Rheological characterization of bituminous binder to predict pavement rutting. In: Sixth International RILEM Symposium on Performance Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials, pp. 117–123. RILEM Publications SARL (2003) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liao, M.-C., Chen, J.-S.: Zero shear viscosity of bitumen-filler mastics. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 23, 1672–1680 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morea, F., Agnusdei, J., Zerbino, R.: Comparison of methods for measuring zero shear viscosity in asphalts. Mater. Struct. 43, 499–507 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Motamed, A., Bhasin, A., Liechti, K.M.: Interaction nonlinearity in asphalt binders. Mech. Time-Depend. Mater. 16, 145–167 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mturi, G.A., Nkgapele, M., O’connell, J.: Creep recovery behaviour of bituminous binders-relevance to permanent deformation of asphalt pavements (2012) Google Scholar
  20. Ossa, E., Deshpande, V., Cebon, D.: Phenomenological model for monotonic and cyclic behavior of pure bitumen. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 17, 188–197 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Qiao, Y., Flintsch, G., Dawson, A., Parry, T.: Examining effects of climatic factors on flexible pavement performance and service life. Transp. Res. Rec. 2349, 100–107 (2013) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vlachovicova, Z., Wekumbura, C., Stastna, J., Zanzotto, L.: Creep characteristics of asphalt modified by radial styrene–butadiene–styrene copolymer. Constr. Build. Mater. 21, 567–577 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wasage, T., Stastna, J., Zanzotto, L.: Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 12, 561–568 (2011) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Woldekidan, M.F.: Response modelling of bitumen, bituminous mastic and mortar. TU Delft, Delft University of Technology (2011) Google Scholar
  25. Zoorob, S., Castro-Gomes, J., Oliveira, L.P., O’connell, J.: Investigating the multiple stress creep recovery bitumen characterisation test. Constr. Build. Mater. 30, 734–745 (2012) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre (NTEC)The University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations