Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 78, Issue 14, pp 20005–20018 | Cite as

AuDIVA: A tool for embedding Audio Descriptions to enhance Video Accessibility for Persons with Visual Impairments

  • Muralidhar PantulaEmail author
  • K. S. Kuppusamy
Article
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

Inclusion of online videos on a website attracts a large number of audience because of its ease of perception. Even though rendering videos on the web is advantageous, persons with disabilities face difficulties in accessing the content. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) has recommended closed captions for persons with hearing problems and Audio descriptions for the persons with visual problems, to remove the barriers in making the video content accessible. In this paper, we have incorporated a technique called Narrating the scene before the act. With this, persons with visual impairments will get a proper understanding of the context of the scene and they will be in a better position to easily grasp the content. We have designed a tool, entitled AuDIVA (Audio Description Inserter for Video Accessibility) which will insert the audio descriptions before the scene in the video at specified intervals. A survey conducted shows that the technique eases tasks for web developers to provide audio descriptions in the video.

Keywords

Audio Descriptions(AD) Video Accessibility Persons with disabilities WCAG 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Benecke B (2004) Audio-description. Meta: J Traducteurs/Meta: Translators J 49(1):78–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benkacem I, Taleb T, Bagaa M, Flinck H (2018) Performance Benchmark of Transcoding as a Virtual Network Function in CDN as a Service Slicing, Proceedings of WCNCGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braun S (2008) Audiodescription research: state of the art and beyond. Transl Stud Millennium 6:14–30. School of Applied Languages, Bilkent University, Ankara, TurkeyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bugajski M, Ansley C (2017) Method and system for transforming video streams using a multi-channel flow-bonded traffic streamGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldwell B, Cooper M, Reid LG, Vanderheiden G (2008) Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 WWW Consortium (W3C)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dimitrova N, Zhang H-J, Shahraray B, Sezan I, Huang T, Zakhor A (2002) Applications of video-content analysis and retrieval. IEEE Multimedia,9,3. IEEE, pp 42–55Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fels DI, Udo JP, Ting P, Diamond JE, Diamond JI (2006) Odd Job Jack described: a universal design approach to described video. Univ Access Inf Soc 5 (1):73–81. SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirchner C, Schmeidler E (2001) Adding audio description: does it make a difference?. J Vis Impair Blindness (JVIB) 95:04. AFB Press, American Foundation for the BlindGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olalere A, Lazar J (2011) Accessibility of US federal government home pages: section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements, vol 28. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peli E, Fine EM, Labianca AT (1996) Evaluating visual information provided by audio description. J Vis Impair Blindness 90:378–385Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pettitt B, Sharpe K, Cooper S (1996) AUDETEL: enhancing television for visually impaired people. Br J Vis Impair 14(2):48–52. Sage Publications Sage, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pfeiffer S, Parker C (2009) Accessibility for the HTML5< video> element, Proceedings of the 2009 International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibililty (W4A). ACM, pp 98–100Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rodríguez-Fuentes LJ, Varona A, Penagarikano M, Bordel G, Diez M (2013) GTTS Systems for the SWS Task at MediaEval, MediaEvalGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rohrbach A, Rohrbach M, Tandon N, Schiele B (2015) A dataset for movie description, Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 3202–3212Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Romero-Fresco P (2013) Accessible filmmaking: joining the dots between audiovisual translation, accessibility and filmmaking. J Specialised Transl 20:201–223Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saxena M, Sharan U, Fahmy S (2008) Analyzing video services in web 2.0: a global perspective. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video. ACM, pp 39–44Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Szarkowska A (2011) Text-to-speech audio description: towards wider availability of AD. J Specialised Transl 15(1):81–98Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walczak A (2017) Audio description on smartphones: making cinema accessible for visually impaired audiences, Universal Access in the Information Society. Springer, pp 1–8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pondicherry UniversityPondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations