Advertisement

A robust digital audio watermarking scheme based on DWT and Schur decomposition

  • Huda Karajeh
  • Tahani Khatib
  • Lama Rajab
  • Mahmoud MaqablehEmail author
Article
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

The vulnerability of digital audio signals for different types of risks requires an imperceptible and robust digital audio watermarking scheme. In this research, we propose creating one such imperceptible and robust hybrid watermarking scheme based on a discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and Schur decomposition hybrid method. The proposed scheme embeds the foreground bits of the watermarking image into the least significant bit of the diagonal coefficients of the triangular matrix S generated from Schur decomposition. Schur decomposition is applied on the second sub-band HL2 generated from applying a second-level 2D-Haar DWT on the first channel of the original audio signal. We analyze the proposed digital audio watermarking scheme’s performance in terms of signal to noise ratio (SNR), objective difference grades (ODG), and subjective difference grades (SDG) that resulting 81.43, 4.78 and 0.184, respectively. The resulting of payload capacity, NC, and BER are as high as 319.29 bps, 0.9911, and 0.0135, respectively. Experimental results confirm that the proposed scheme is inaudible and robust against common types of attacks such as Gaussian noise, re-quantization, re-sampling, low-pass filter, high-pass filter, echo, MP3 compression, and cropping. In comparison with state-of-the-art audio watermarking schemes, the proposed scheme’s performance is superior in term of imperceptibility, robustness, and data payload size.

Keywords

Audio watermarking Discrete wavelet transform Schur decomposition Copyright protection 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Abd El-Samie FE (2009) An efficient singular value decomposition algorithm for digital audio watermarking. Int J Speech Technol 12:27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-009-9056-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alanizy N, Alanizy A, Baghoza N, et al (2018) 3-Layer PC Text Security via Combining Compression, AES Cryptography 2LSB Image Steganography, Journal of Research in Engineering and Applied Sciences (JREAS), Vol. 3, No. 4, Pages: 118–124, October 2018Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alassaf N, Gutub A, Parah SA, Al Ghamdi M (2018) Enhancing Speed of SIMON: A Light-Weight-Cryptographic Algorithm for IoT Applications, Multimedia Tools and Applications: An International Journal - Springer, ISSN 1380–7501, DOI  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6801-z, Published online: 5 2018
  4. 4.
    Al-Haj A (2014) An imperceptible and robust audio watermarking algorithm. EURASIP J Audio, Speech, Music Proc 2014:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13636-014-0037-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Haj A (2014) A dual transform audio watermarking algorithm. Multimed Tools Appl 73:1897–1912.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-013-1645-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Haj A, Twal C, Mohammad A (2010) Hybrid DWT-SVD audio watermarking. 2010 5th Int Conf Digit Inf Manag ICDIM 2010:525–529.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2010.5664651
  7. 7.
    Aljuaid N, Gutub A, Khan E (2018) Enhancing PC Data Security via Combining RSA Cryptography and Video Based Steganography", Journal of Information Security and Cybercrimes Research (JISCR), Vol. 1, No. 1, Pages: 8–18, Published by Naif Arab University for Security Sciences (NAUSS), June 2018Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Attari AA, AsgharBeheshtiShirazi A (2017) Robust and Blind Audio Watermarking in Wavelet Domain. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Graphics and Signal Processing - ICGSP ‘17. Singapore, Singapore, pp 69–73Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bansal N, Bansal A, Deolia V, Pathak P (2015) Comparative Analysis of LSB, DCT and DWT for Digital Watermarking. In: 2nd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom). Mathura, India, pp 40–45Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bassia P, Pitas I, Nikolaidis N (2001) Robust audio watermarking in the time domain. IEEE Trans Multimed 3:232–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhat V, Sengupta KI, Das A (2010) An adaptive audio watermarking based on the singular value decomposition in the wavelet domain. Digit Sign Proc 20:1547–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhat V, Sengupta I, Das A (2011) An audio watermarking scheme using singular value decomposition and dither-modulation quantization. Multimed Tools Appl 52:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Charfeddine M, El’Arbi M, Ben AC (2014) A new DCT audio watermarking scheme based on preliminary MP3 study. Multimed Tools Appl 70:1521–1557.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1167-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choudhary A, Chauhan S (2012) Schur decomposition and dither modulation: an efficient and robust audio watermarking technique. Proc CUBE:744–748.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2381716.2381858
  15. 15.
    Deb K, Rahman MA, Sultana KZ et al (2014) DCT and DWT based robust audio watermarking scheme for copyright protection. J Korea Inst Sign Proc Syst 15:1–9Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Deokar SM, Dhaigude B (2015) Blind Audio Watermarking Based On Discrete Wavelet and Cosine Transform. In: 2015 International Conference on Industrial Instrumentation and Control (ICIC). Pune, pp 264–268Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dhar PK, Shimamura T (2017) Blind audio watermarking in transform domain based on singular value decomposition and exponential-log operations. Radioengineering 26:552–561.  https://doi.org/10.13164/re.2017.0552 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dong L, Yan Q, Lv Y, Deng S (2017) Full band watermarking in DCT domain with Weibull model. Multimed Tools Appl 76:1983–2000.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-015-3115-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dutt S (2011) A DWT-HAAR based audio watermarking algorithm. 416–419Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elgamal a F (2013) Block-based watermarking for color images using DCT and DWT. Int J Comput Appl 66:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    feng LJ, Wang HX, Wu T et al (2017) Norm ratio-based audio watermarking scheme in DWT domain. Multimed Tools Appl:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5024-z
  22. 22.
    Full EWK, Metkar S, Kamble HC (2014) Image watermarking by SCHUR decomposition. Int J Inf Comput Technol 4:1155–1159Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ganic E, Eskicioglu AM (2004) Robust DWT-SVD domain image watermarking. Proc 2004 Multimed Secur Work Multimed Secur - MM&Sec ‘04 166 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1145/1022431.1022461
  24. 24.
    Gutub A (2017) Counting-Based Secret Sharing Technique for Multimedia Applications, Multimedia Tools and Applications: An International Journal - Springer, ISSN 1380–7501, DOI  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5293-6, Published online: 2 November 2017
  25. 25.
    Hemalatha S, Acharya UD, Renuka a, Kamath PR (2012) A novel colorImage steganography using Discrete Wavelet Transform. Proc Second Int Conf Comput Sci Eng Inf Technol - CCSEIT ‘12 223–226 . doi:  https://doi.org/10.1145/2393216.2393254
  26. 26.
    Hsu LY, Hu HT (2015) Blind image watermarking via exploitation of inter-block prediction and visibility threshold in DCT domain. J Vis Commun Image Represent 32:130–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2015.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hu HT, Hsu LY (2015) Robust, transparent and high-capacity audio watermarking in DCT domain. Signal Process 109:226–235.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hu HT, Hsu LY (2016) A DWT-based rational dither modulation scheme for effective blind audio watermarking. Circuits, Syst Sign Proc 35:553–572.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-015-0074-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hu HT, Hsu LY (2017) Incorporating spectral shaping filtering into DWT-based vector modulation to improve blind audio watermarking. Wirel Pers Commun 94:221–240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3178-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hu HT, Hsu LY, Chou HH (2014) Variable-dimensional vector modulation for perceptual-based DWT blind audio watermarking with adjustable payload capacity. Digit Sign Process A Rev J 31:115–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2014.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hu HT, Hsu LY, Chou HH (2014) Perceptual-based DWPT-DCT framework for selective blind audio watermarking. Signal Process 105:316–627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hu HT, Chen SH, Hsu LY (2014) Incorporation of perceptually energy-compensated qim into dwt-dct based blind audio watermarking. In: Proceedings - 2014 10th International Conference on Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing. Kitakyushu, Japan, pp 748–752Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hu HT, Hsu LY, Garcia-Alfaro J (2015) Exploring DWT-SVD-DCT feature parameters for robust multiple watermarking against JPEG and JPEG2000 compression. Comput Electr Eng 41:52–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2014.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hua G, Huang J, Shi YQ et al (2016) Twenty years of digital audio watermarking—a comprehensive review. Signal Process 128:222–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kabal P (2003) An Examination and Interpretation of ITU-R BS. 1387: Perceptual Evaluation of Audio QualityGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Karajeh H, Maqableh M (2018) An imperceptible , robust , and high payload capacity audio watermarking scheme based on the DCT transformation and Schur decomposition. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-018-1332-0
  37. 37.
    Kaur N, Kaur U (2013) Audio watermarking using Arnold transformation with DWT-DCT. Int J Comput Sci Eng 2:286–294Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kaur A, Dutta MK, Soni KM, Taneja N (2017) Localized & self adaptive audio watermarking algorithm in the wavelet domain. J Inf Secur Appl 33:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2016.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kavadia C, Lodha A (2013) A review on spatial & transform domain digital watermarking techniques. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci 4:20–22Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lei B, Soon IY, Zhou F et al (2012) A robust audio watermarking scheme based on lifting wavelet transform and singular value decomposition. Signal Process 92:1985–2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Li D, Ji Y, Kim J (2011) A Quantified Audio Watermarking Algorithm Based on DWT-DCT. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 339–340Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lie W-N, Chang L-C (2006) Robust and high-quality time-domain audio watermarking based on low-frequency amplitude modification. IEEE Trans Multimed 8:46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu J, She K (2012) A hybrid approach of DWT and DCT for rational dither modulation watermarking. Circuits Syst Sign Proc 31:797–811.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-011-9331-8 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Looperman Pro Audio Resources Community Forums, https://www.looperman.com, Accessed Date: 15 July, 2017
  45. 45.
    Maha C, Maher E, Mohamed K, Chokri BA (2010) DCT Based blind audio watermarking scheme. In: 2010 International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications (SIGMAP). Athens, Greece, pp 139–144Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Meenakshi K, Rao CS, Prasad KS (2014) a fast and robust hybrid watermarking scheme based on Schur and Svd transform. Int J Res Eng Technol 3:7–11Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mohammad AA (2012) A new digital image watermarking scheme based on Schur decomposition. Multimed Tools Appl 59:851–883.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-011-0772-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mohan BC, Swamy KV (2010) On the use of Schur decomposition for copyright protection of digital images. Int J Comput Electr Eng 2:781–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mohan B, Swamy K, Kumar S (2011) A Comparative performance evaluation of SVD and Schur Decompositions for Image Watermarking. IJCA Proc Int Conf VLSI … 25–30Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Özer H, Sankur B, Memon N (2005) An SVD-based audio watermarking technique. Proc 7th Work Multimed Secur - MM&Sec ‘05 51. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1145/1073170.1073180
  51. 51.
    Pattanshetti P, Dongaonkar S, Karpe S (2015) Digital watermarking in audio using least significant bit and discrete cosine transform. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol 6:3688–3692Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ponni Alias Sathya S, Ramakrishnan S (2018) Fibonacci based key frame selection and scrambling for video watermarking in DWT–SVD domain. Wirel Pers Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5252-1
  53. 53.
    Rajab L, Al-khatib T, Al-haj A (2015) A blind DWT-SCHUR based digital video watermarking technique. J Softw Eng Appl 8:224–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Razafindradina HB, Razafindrakoto NR, Randriamitantsoa PA (2013) Improved watermarking scheme using discrete cosine transform and Schur decomposition. IJCSN - Int J Comput Sci Netw 02:25–31Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Roy S, Sarkar N, Chowdhury AK, Iqbal SMA (2015) An efficient and blind audio watermarking technique in DCT domain. In: 2015 18th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, ICCIT. Dhaka, pp 362–367Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Šego V (2014) The hyperbolic Schur decomposition. Linear Algebra Appl 440:90–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2013.10.037 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Singh D, Singh SK (2017) DWT-SVD and DCT based robust and blind watermarking scheme for copyright protection. Multimed Tools Appl 76:13001–13024.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3706-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Su Q, Niu Y, Liu X, Zhu Y (2012) Embedding color watermarks in color images based on Schur decomposition. Opt Commun 285:1792–1802.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2011.12.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Subir JAM (2016) DWT-DCT based blind audio watermarking using Arnold scrambling and Cyclic codes. In: 3rd International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN). Noida, pp 79–84Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Suresh G, Lalitha NV, Srinivasa Rao C, Sailaja V (2012) An efficient and simple audio watermarking using DCT-SVD. 2012 Int Conf devices. Circuits Syst ICDCS 2012:177–181.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSyst.2012.6188699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Thind DK, Jindal S (2015) A semi blind DWT-SVD video watermarking. Procedia Comput Sci 46:1661–1667.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.02.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tsai H-H, Cheng J-S, Yu P-T (2003) Audio watermarking based on HAS and neural networks in DCT domain. EURASIP J Adv Sign Proc 2003:252–263.  https://doi.org/10.1155/S1110865703208027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wang H, Nishimura R, Suzuki Y, Mao L (2008) Fuzzy self-adaptive digital audio watermarking based on time-spread echo hidinge. Appl Acoust 69:868–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Wang X-Y, Niu P-P, Yang H-Y (2009) A robust digital audio watermarking based on statistics characteristics. Pattern Recogn 42:3057–3064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wang X, Wang P, Zhang P, HY SX (2013) Norm-space, aadaptive, and blind audio watermarking algorithm by discrete wavelet transform. Signal Process 93:913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wu S, Huang J, Huang D, Shi YQ (2005) Efficiently self-synchronized audio watermarking for assured audio data transmission. IEEE Trans Broadcast 51:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Xiang S (2011) Audio watermarking robust against D/a and a/D conversions. EURASIP J Adv Sign Proc 2011:3.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-6180-2011-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Xiang S, Huang J (2007) Histogram-based audio watermarking against time-scale modification and cropping attacks. IEEE Trans Multimed 9:1357–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yang Y, Lei M, Liu X et al (2016) Novel zero-watermarking scheme based on DWT- DCT. China Commun 13:122–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zear A, Singh AK, Kumar P (2016) A proposed secure multiple watermarking technique based on DWT, DCT and SVD for application in medicine. Multimed Tools Appl:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3862-8
  71. 71.
    Zhang J (2015) Audio dual watermarking scheme for copyright protection and content authentication. Int J Speech Technol 18:443–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-015-9287-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.King Abdullah II School for Information TechnologyUniversity of JordanAmmanJordan
  2. 2.Management Information Systems Department, School of BusinessThe University of JordanAmmanJordan

Personalised recommendations