Advertisement

Determination on environmental factors and growth factors affecting tomato yield using pattern recognition techniques

  • Yuha Park
  • Myung Hwan Na
  • Wanhyun ChoEmail author
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

In the area of smart farming, a big data is being created using information and communication technologies such as the Internet of Things and Cloud computing. Drawing clear and reliable information from analyzing the big data is a challenge task for farmers, researchers, consultants and participants in the agricultural production business. Now, however, there are no many researches as much as the participants need. The paper suggests a statistical application approach for seeking the useful information of the agricultural big data. In the paper the dataset is composed in order to conduct quantitative analysis. From various radars and sensors in researched greenhouses, five environmental factors are measured. In addition to using those environmental factors, a dataset is built through collecting four growth factors, and yield of tomato. Using pattern recognition techniques such as dynamic time warping and multidimensional scaling the paper investigates the relationships among three factors, the environmental factors, the growth factors, and the tomato yield in order to find the most important environmental and growth factors with the aim to increasing tomato production in facility farms. Through analyzing the observed dataset using those pattern recognition techniques, the similarities of temporal sequences among the given patterns of the factors can be measured. Therefore the paper determines the environmental factors and the growth factors that have a strong influence on tomato production currently grown in smart farming greenhouses. Using the analysis results, the paper proposes data-driven cultivation strategies for managing the environmental and growth factors to increase the productivities of tomato.

Keywords

Tomato production Smart farming Environmental factors Growth factors Pattern recognition techniques Graphic analysis method Dynamic time warping Multidimensional scaling Data-driven cultivation techniques 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the Research Program of Rural Development Administration (Project No. PJ01283009), and the Korea National Research Foundation (Project No. 2017R1D1A1B03028808) of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government.

References

  1. 1.
    Boyer LR, Feng W, Gulbis N, Hajdu K, Harrison RJ, Jeffries P, Xu X (2016) The use of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi to improve tomato production in coir substrate. Front Plant Sci 7(1237):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaudhuri BB, Rankine D, Linggard R (1983) Automatic Recognition of Isolated Spoken Words with New Features. Electron Lett 39(11):865Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho W, Na M, Park Y (2018) Extraction of optimum condition of cultivation factors to improve tomato production using statistical regression analysis and response surface methodology. Adv Sci Lett 24:2084–2087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coble KH, Mishra AK, Ferrell S, Griffin T (2018) Big data in agriculture: a challenge for the future. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 40(1):79–96.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aepp/ppx056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa JA, Patwari N, Hero AO III (2006) Distributed weighted-multidimensional scaling for node localization in sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks 2(1):39–64.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1138127.1138129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Estrada-Ortiz E, Trejo-Tellez LI, Gomez-Merino FC, Nunez-Escobar R, Sandoval-Villa M (2013) The effects of phosphite on tomato yield and fruit quality. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 13(3):612–620.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162013005000049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fan L, Dube C, Khanizadeh S (2017) The effect of production systems on tomato quality (Phenolic Compounds Marcos Soto-Hernández). IntechOpen 177-213.  https://doi.org/10.5772/67233
  8. 8.
    Giorgino T (2009) Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: The DTW package. Journal of Statistical Software 31(7): 1–24. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v31/i07/. Accessed Aug 2009
  9. 9.
    Giorgino T, Tormene P (2009) DTW: Dynamic time warping algorithms. R package version 1.13–1, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dtw. Accessed 18 May 2018
  10. 10.
    Jaworska N, Chupetlovska-Anastasova A (2009) A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 5(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Letourneau G, Caron J, Anderson L, Cormier J (2015) Matric potential-based irrigation management of field-grown tomato: effects on yield and water use efficiency. Agric Water Manag 161:102–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers CS, Rabiner LR, Rosenberg AE (1981) On the Use of Dynamic Time Warping for Word Spotting and Connected Word Recognition. Bell Labs Technical Journal 60(3):303–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Na M, Park Y, Cho W (2017) A study on optimal environmental factors of tomato using smart farm data. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science. Society 28(6):1427–1435Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Senin P (2008) Dynamic time warping algorithm review, technical report. Information and Computer Science Department. University of Hawaii at Manoa, HonoluluGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stubbs M (2016) Big data in U.S. agriculture, Congressional Research Service Report. 1–14Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sundmaeker H, Verdouw C, Wolfert S, Pérez Freire L (2016) Internet of food and farm 2020. In: Vermesan O, Friess P (eds) Digitising the Industry - Internet of Things Connecting Physical, Digital and Virtual Worlds. River Publishers, Gistrup, pp 129–151Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tuzcu V, Nas S (2005) Dynamic time warping as a novel tool in pattern recognition of ECG changes in heart rhythm disturbances. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems. Man and Cybernetics 1:182–186.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2005.1571142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wolfert S, Ge L, Verdouw C, Bogaardt M-J (2017) Big data in smart farming – a review. Agric Syst 153:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wolfert J, Sørensen CG, Goense D (2014) A Future Internet Collaboration Platform for Safe and Healthy Food from Farm to Fork, Global Conference (SRII), 2014 Annual SRII. IEEE, San Jose, pp 266–273Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhen D, Wang T, Gu F, Ball AD (2013) Fault diagnosis of motor drives using stator current signal analysis based on dynamic time warping. Mech Syst Signal Process 34:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chonnam National UniversityGwangjuSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations