Game analysis of the equity investment exit mechanism of university schools and enterprises under the background of internet multimedia convergence

  • Yuxin YangEmail author


In today’s highly developed information, multimedia involves no longer just the traditional teaching and media industry, but a broader and more comprehensive process. The game analysis of using the Internet multimedia to carry out the investment exit mechanism of colleges and universities can greatly improve Management efficiency. This paper analyses the game form of the equity investment exit mechanism of colleges and universities in the context of Internet multimedia fusion, and analyses its existence and significance to enhance the equity exit mechanism of schools and enterprises, and analyses and discusses them. This paper establishes a game analysis on the exit method and exit timing of college-enterprise equity investment, which has certain reference value. The perfect exit mechanism is an inevitable requirement for the development of equity investment in colleges and universities, and it is an inseparable part of the equity investment system of colleges and universities. This will enable China’s colleges and universities to have a relatively good and standardized operating environment for equity investment, which will drive China’s economic connotation growth. This has related to the construction of many external environments such as capital markets, policies, and regulations. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the multi-level capital market as soon as possible and accelerate the construction of external systems such as policies and regulations.


Multimedia Equity investment Exit mechanism Internet multimedia fusion College-enterprise 



Fund for innovative research team of Xi’an International University No. XAIU-KT201805-2.


  1. 1.
    Agrawal A, Catalini C, Goldfarb A (2014) Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy 14(1):63–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baraldi E, Havenvid MI (2016) Identifying new dimensions of business incubation: a multi-level analysis of Karolinska Institute's incubation system. Technovation 50:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braghirolli LF, Ribeiro JLD, Weise AD, Pizzolato M (2016) Benefits of educational games as an introductory activity in industrial engineering education. Comput Hum Behav 58:315–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chabrak N, Craig R, Daidj N (2016) Nouveau riche, old guard, established elite: agency and the leadership of vivendi universal. Leadership 12(4):398–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engel JS (2015) Global clusters of innovation: lessons from Silicon Valley. Calif Manag Rev 57(2):36–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gleasure R, Feller J (2016) Emerging technologies and the democratisation of financial services: a metatriangulation of crowdfunding research. Inf Organ 26(4):101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hope W (2017) Epochality, temporality and media-communication ownership in Aotearoa-New Zealand. MEDIANZ: Media studies journal of Aotearoa New Zealand, 17(1)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jin DY, Chee F, Kim S (2015) Transformative mobile game culture: a sociocultural analysis of Korean mobile gaming in the era of smartphones. Int J Cult Stud 18(4):413–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kapoor KK, Tamilmani K, Rana NP, Patil P, Dwivedi YK, Nerur S (2018) Advances in social media research: past, present and future. Inf Syst Front 20(3):531–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar A, Bezawada R, Rishika R, Janakiraman R, Kannan PK (2016) From social to sale: the effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. J Mark 80(1):7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lanzolla G, Giudici A (2017) Pioneering strategies in the digital world. Insights from the Axel springer case. Bus Hist 59(5):744–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laukkanen S, Lindell M, Vanjoki A (2017) 15. Corporate entrepreneurship in a large company: skunk works or guided. Handbook of research on corporate governance and entrepreneurship, 397Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee Y, Park H, Cameron GT (2018) Strategic communication in US higher education: testing congruity effects of university identity and image among parents of prospective students. Int J Strateg Commun 12(3):308–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liguori M, Steccolini I (2014) Accounting, innovation and public-sector change. Translating reforms into change. Crit Perspect Account 25(4–5):319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lopez-Gonzalez H, Griffiths MD (2018) Understanding the convergence of markets in online sports betting. Int Rev Sociol Sport 53(7):807–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maniora J (2017) Is integrated reporting really the superior mechanism for the integration of ethics into the core business model? An empirical analysis. J Bus Ethics 140(4):755–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mendes-Da-Silva W, Rossoni L, Conte BS, Gattaz CC, Francisco ER (2016) The impacts of fundraising periods and geographic distance on financing music production via crowdfunding in Brazil. J Cult Econ 40(1):75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Olsen PI, Håkansson H (2017) The roles of deals and business networks in innovation processes. IMP Journal 11(1):25–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rtischev D (2017) A strategic behavior analysis of why ventures are risky for young people in Japan but not in Silicon Valley. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 44:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siegel DS, Wright M (2015) University technology transfer offices, licensing, and start-ups. Chicago handbook of university technology transfer and academic entrepreneurship, 1–40Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Silver L, Berggren B, Fili A (2016) The role of crowdfunding in entrepreneurial ventures: an analysis of recent trends in Sweden. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 13(1):221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stock M, Isenberg V, Reißmann W, Kaiser S, Nieland JU (2017) Fan (fiction) acting on media and the politics of appropriation. Media Commun 5(3):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Töpfer LM (2017) Institutional change in Chinese cross-border finance: foreign investors, the party-state and power resources. Rev Int Polit Econ 24(1):144–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang H, Wang X, Bu F, Wang G, Pan Y (2018) How the asymmetric information creates bubbles in Stock market? Open Journal of Social Sciences 6(08):202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Xi’an International UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations