Advertisement

A unified framework for data integrity protection in people-centric smart cities

  • May AltulyanEmail author
  • Lina Yao
  • Salil S. Kanhere
  • Xianzhi Wang
  • Chaoran Huang
Article
  • 38 Downloads

Abstract

With the rapid increase in urbanisation, the concept of smart cities has attracted considerable attention. By leveraging emerging technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence and cloud computing, smart cities have the potential to improve various indicators of residents’ quality of life. However, threats to data integrity may affect the delivery of such benefits, especially in the IoT environment where most devices are inherently dynamic and have limited resources. Prior work has focused on ensuring integrity of data in a piecemeal manner and covering only some parts of the smart city ecosystem. In this paper, we address integrity of data from an end-to-end perspective, i.e., from the data source to the data consumer. We propose a holistic framework for ensuring integrity of data in smart cities that covers the entire data lifecycle. Our framework is founded on three fundamental concepts, namely, secret sharing, fog computing and blockchain. We provide a detailed description of various components of the framework and also utilize smart healthcare as use case.

Keywords

Internet of Things Smart cities Blockchain Data integrity 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Alghamdi WY, Wu H, Kanhere SS (2017) Reliable and secure end-to-end data aggregation using secret sharing in wsns. In: Wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC), 2017 IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bakıcı T, Almirall E, Wareham J (2013) A smart city initiative: the case of barcelona. J Knowl Econ 4(2):135–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baliga A (2017) Understanding blockchain consensus models. PersistentGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banerjee M, Lee J, Choo K-KR (2017) A blockchain future for internet-of-things security: a position paper. Digital Communications and NetworksGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biswas K, Muthukkumarasamy V (2016) Securing smart cities using blockchain technology. In: , 2016 IEEE 18th international conference on high performance computing and communications; IEEE 14th international conference on smart city; IEEE 2nd international conference on data science and systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS), IEEE, pp 1392–1393Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakrabarty S, Engels DW (2016) A secure iot architecture for smart cities. In: Consumer communications & networking conference (CCNC), 2016 13th IEEE annual, IEEE, pp 812–813Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang X, Yu Y-L, Yang Y, Xing EP (2017) Semantic pooling for complex event analysis in untrimmed videos. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 39(8):1617–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dorri A, Kanhere SS, Jurdak R (2017) Towards an optimized blockchain for iot. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on internet-of-things design and implementation, ACM, pp 173–178Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farooq MU, Waseem M, Khairi A, Mazhar S (2015) A critical analysis on the security concerns of internet of things (iot). Int J Comput Appl 7:111Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ferreira C, Walsh R, Ferreira A (2018) Degradation in urban areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & HealthGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gope P, Hwang T (2016) Bsn-care: a secure iot-based modern healthcare system using body sensor network. IEEE Sens J 16(5):1368–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jararweh Y, Al-Ayyoub M, Benkhelifa E, et al. (2018) An experimental framework for future smart cities using data fusion and software defined systems: the case of environmental monitoring for smart healthcare. Future Generation Computer SystemsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jose J, Jose J, Princy M (2014) A survey on privacy preserving data aggregation protocols forwireless sensor networks. J Comput Inf Technol 22(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Jiang P, Chen T, Luo X, Wen Q (2017) A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Future Generation Computer SystemsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu B, Yu XL, Chen S, Xu X, Zhu L (2017) Blockchain based data integrity service framework for iot data. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on Web services (ICWS), IEEE, pp 468–475Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu C, Yang C, Zhang X, Chen J (2015) External integrity verification for outsourced big data in cloud and iot: a big picture. Futur Gener Comput Syst 49:58–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mazieres D (2015) The stellar consensus protocol: a federated model for internet-level consensus. Stellar Development FoundationGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patil NS, Patil P (2010) Data aggregation in wireless sensor network. In: IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and computing research, vol 6Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perera C, Qin Y, Estrella JC, Reiff-Marganiec S, Vasilakos AV (2017) Fog computing for sustainable smart cities: a survey. ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 50(3):32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rezvani M, Ignjatovic A, Bertino E, Jha S (2015) Secure data aggregation technique for wireless sensor networks in the presence of collusion attacks. IEEE Trans Dependable Secure Comput 12(1):98–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rifi N, Rachkidi E, Agoulmine N, Taher NC (2017) Towards using blockchain technology for iot data access protection. In: 2017 IEEE 17th international conference on ubiquitous wireless broadband (ICUWB), IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sagirlar G, Carminati B, Ferrari E, Sheehan JD, Ragnoli E (2018) Hybrid-iot: Hybrid blockchain architecture for internet of things-pow sub-blockchains. arXiv:1804.03903
  23. 23.
    Salama U, Yao L, Wang X, Paik H-Y, Beheshti A (2017) Multi-level privacy-preserving access control as a service for personal healthcare monitoring. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on Web services (ICWS), IEEE, pp 878–881Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sandhu RS (1993) On five definitions of data integrity. In: DBSec, pp 257–267Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharma PK, Chen M-Y, Park JH (2018) A software defined fog node based distributed blockchain cloud architecture for iot. IEEE Access 6:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharma PK, Moon SY, Park JH (2017) Block-vn: a distributed blockchain based vehicular network architecture in smart city. J Inf Process Syst 13(1):84Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sheng M, Qin Y, Yao L, Benatallah B (2017) Managing the Web of things: linking the real world to the web. Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sivathanu G, Wright CP, Zadok E (2005) Ensuring data integrity in storage: techniques and applications. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on storage security and survivability, ACM, pp 26–36Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Song T, Li R, Mei B, Yu J, Xing X, Cheng X (2017) A privacy preserving communication protocol for iot applications in smart homes. IEEE Internet Things J 4(6):1844–1852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Su K, Li J, Fu H (2011) Smart city and the applications. In: 2011 International conference on electronics, communications and control (ICECC), IEEE, pp 1028–1031Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang Y, Wang X, Zhu S, Cao G (2008) Sdap: a secure hop-by-hop data aggregation protocol for sensor networks. ACM Trans Inf Syst Secur (TISSEC) 11(4):18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yao L, Sheng QZ, Dustdar S (2015) Web-based management of the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput 19(4):60–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yao L, Sheng QZ, Ngu AH, Li X (2016) Things of interest recommendation by leveraging heterogeneous relations in the internet of things. ACM Trans Internet Technol (TOIT) 16(2):9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yi S, Li C, Li Q (2015) A survey of fog computing: concepts, applications and issues. In: Proceedings of the 2015 workshop on mobile big data, ACM, pp 37–42Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zeng Z, Li Z, Cheng D, Zhang H, Zhan K, Yang Y (2018) Two-stream multirate recurrent neural network for video-based pedestrian reidentification. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 14(7):3179–3186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zheng Z, Xie S, Dai H-N, Wang H (2016) Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Work Pap.–2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringUNSWSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of SoftwareUniversity of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations