Advertisement

A multimedia image edge extraction algorithm based on flexible representation of quantum

  • Zhongyue LuEmail author
  • Xiaoming Wang
  • Jianzhong Shang
  • Zirong Luo
  • Chongfei Sun
  • Guoheng Wu
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

To solve the real-time problem of edge extraction algorithm and improve image edge continuity, an edge extraction algorithm based on quantum flexible representation (flexible representation of Quantum, RFQ) is proposed. First, the image is represented by quantum flexibility, the superposition state of the quantum sequence is used to store all the pixels of the image, and the FRQ image is obtained by the quantum parallel computation which efficiency is greatly improved, secondly, by the translation transformation of the X and Y directions of the FRQ image, the relative quanta of the neighboring pixels of the whole image is obtained. According to the quantum bit to define the quantum black boxUΩ, combining the Sobel operator to compute the Sobel gradient of pixels in order to judge different categories of pixels and extract the edges of the image. The experimental results show that the proposed method has better edge continuity and richer detail edge than the current edge extraction algorithm.

Keywords

Flexible representation of quantum Image edge extraction Quantum qequence Quantum black box Sobel gradient 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Khalek S, Abdel-Azim G, Abo-Eleneen ZA et al (2016) New approach to image edge detection based on quantum entropy[J]. Journal of Russian Laser Research 37(2):141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao F, Gousseau Y, Masnou S et al (2011) Geometrically guided exemplar-based inpainting[J]. Siam Journal on Imaging Sciences 4(4):1143–1179MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gui L (2012) An improved image edge feature extraction algorithm based on ant Colony algorithm[J]. Adv Mater Res 490-495(4):120–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hill C, Gordon IE, Kochanov RV et al (2016) HITRAN online: an online interface and the flexible representation of spectroscopic data in the HITRAN database[J]. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transf 177:4–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jiang N, Wang L (2015) Quantum image scaling using nearest neighbor interpolation[J]. Quantum Inf Process 14(5):1559–1571MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jiang N, Wu W, Wang L et al (2015) Quantum image pseudocolor coding based on the density-stratified method[J]. Quantum Inf Process 14(5):1735–1755MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Landgren M, Pdf AA (2014) Segmentation of medical images, applications in echocardiography and nuclear medicine[J]. Licentiate Theses in Mathematical SciencesGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oh SL, Hagiwara Y, Raghavendra U, Yuvaraj R, Arunkumar N, Murugappan M, Acharya UR (2018) A deep learning approach for Parkinson’s disease diagnosis from EEG signals. Neural Comput & Applic:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3689-5
  9. 9.
    Qian C, Fang Y (2018) Adaptive tracking control of flapping wing micro-air vehicles with averaging theory. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology 3(1):18–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rajendra Achary U, Hagiwara Y, Deshpande SN, Suren S, Koh JEW, Oh SL, Arunkumar N, Ciaccio EJ, Lim CM (2019) Characterization of focal EEG signals: a review. Futur Gener Comput Syst 91:290–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thongkamwitoon T, Muammar H, Dragotti PL (2015) An image recapture detection algorithm based on learning dictionaries of edge profiles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics & Security 10(5):953–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van d SM, De With PHN (2000) Near-lossless complexity-scalable embedded compression algorithm for cost reduction in DTV receivers[J]. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 46(4):923–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang S, Song X, Niu X (2014) A novel encryption algorithm for quantum images based on quantum wavelet transform and diffusion[M]// Intelligent Data analysis and its Applications, Volume II. Springer International Publishing, p 243–250Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu J, Xu X (2018) Decentralised grid scheduling approach based on multi-agent reinforcement learning and gossip mechanism. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology 3(1):8–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang Y, Lu K, Gao YH (2015) QSobel: a novel quantum image edge extraction algorithm[J]. SCIENCE CHINA Inf Sci 58(1):12106–012106zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu X, Zhang Q, Liu D, et al (2010) An edge extraction algorithm of thenar palmprint image based on wavelet multi-scale[C]// International Symposium on Information Processing. IEEE Computer Society, p 555–558Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhongyue Lu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaoming Wang
    • 2
  • Jianzhong Shang
    • 1
  • Zirong Luo
    • 1
  • Chongfei Sun
    • 1
  • Guoheng Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Mechatronics and AutomationNational University of Defense TechnologyChangshaChina
  2. 2.Beijing Special Engineering and Design Institute (BSEDI)BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations