Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 78, Issue 3, pp 3203–3220 | Cite as

Trajectory tracking optimization of mobile robot using artificial immune system

  • Seongsoo Cho
  • Bhanu ShresthaEmail author
  • Wook Jang
  • Changho Seo
Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, an optimization method that provides quick response using artificial immune system, is proposed and applied to a mobile robot for trajectory tracking. The study focuses on the immune theory to derive a quick optimization method that puts emphasis on immunity feedback using memory cells by the expansion and suppression of the test group rather than to derive a specific mathematical model of the artificial immune system. Various trajectories were selected in mobile environment to evaluate the performance of the proposed artificial immune system. The global inputs to the mobile robot are reference position and reference velocity, which are time variables. The global output of mobile robot is a current position. The tracking controller makes position error to be converged to zero. In order to reduce position error, compensation velocities on the track of trajectory are necessary. Input variables of fuzzy are position errors in every sampling time. The output values of fuzzy are compensation velocities. Immune algorithm is implemented to adjust the scaling factor of fuzzy automatically. The results of the computer simulation proved the system to be efficient and effective for tracing the trajectory to the final destination by the mobile robot.

Keywords

Artificial immune system Optimization Mobile robot Trajectory tracking 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MISP)(2016R1A4A1011761). This research was conducted by the grant of Kwangwoon University, 2018.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdalla TY, Hamzah MI (2013) Trajectory tracking control for mobile robot using wavelet network. Int J Comput Appl 74(3):32–37Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chun JS, Kim MK, Jung HK, Hong SK (1997) Shape optimization of electromagnetic devices using immune algorithm. IEEE Trans Magn 33(2):1876–1879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dipankar D, Fernando N (2008) Immunological computation: theory and applications. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duan QJ, Wang RX, Feng HS, Wang LG (2005) Applying synthesized immune networks hypothesis to mobile robots. In: Autonomous Decentralized Systems, IEEE Proc, 69–73Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fahimi F (2009) Autonomous robots: modeling, path planning, and control. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gao W (2004) Fast immunized evolutionary programming. In Machine Learning and Cybernetics, IEEE Int Conf, 1:198–203Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayakody JASS, Munagamage R, Munasinghe KDKM, Muhandiram TMMP, Premarathna PAIN, and Rajakaruna RMTP (2015) Design and development of an omni-directional wheeled mobile roBOT. International Research Symposium on Engineering Advancements 2015 (RSEA 2015), 208–210Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jerne NK (1973) The immune system. Sci Am 229(1):52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jerne NK, Cocteau J (1984) IdIOTypic networks and other preconceived ideas. Immunol Rev 79(1):5–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim S, Park C (2005) Optimal tracking controller for an autonomous wheeled mobile robot using fuzzy genetic algorithm. In ICMIT 2005: Cont Sys and Robo 60422C-60422C,  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.664653
  11. 11.
    Kim SH, Park C, Harashima F (2001) A self-organized fuzzy controller for wheeled mobile robot using an evolutionary algorithm. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 48(2):467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leandro N, Castro D, Jonathan T (2002) Artificial immunities: a new computational intelligence approach. Springer-Verlag Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin P, Abney K, Bekey G (2011) Robot ethics: mapping the issues for a mechanized world. Artif Intell 175(5):942–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Luh GC, Liu WW (2008) An immunological approach to mobile robot reactive navigation. Appl Soft Comput 8(1):30–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meshref H, VanLandingham H (2000) Artificial immune systems: application to autonomous agents. In Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2000 IEEE Int Conf, 1: 61–66Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nguyen QH, Vu H, Tran TH, Nguyen QH (2017) Developing a way-finding system on mobile robot assisting visually impaired people in an indoor environment. Multimedia Tools and Applications 76(2):2645–2669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ozcelik S, Sukumaran S (2011) Implementation of an artificial immune system on a mobile robot. Procedia Computer Science 6:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pedraza C, Castillo J, Martínez JI, Huerta P, Bosque JL, Cano J (2011) Genetic algorithm for Boolean minimization in an FPGA cluster. J Supercomput 58(2):244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pham TT, Mulhem P, Maisonnasse L, Gaussier E, Lim JH (2012) Visual graph modeling for scene recognition and mobile robot localization. Multimedia Tools and Applications 60(2):419–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rawlik K, Zarubin D, Toussaint M, Vijayakumar S (2018) An approximate inference approach to temporal optimization for robotics. In: Robotics Research, 145–162Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Razafimandimby C, Loscri V, and Vegni AM (2016, April) A neural network and IoT based scheme for performance assessment in Internet of Robotic Things. In Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI), 2016 IEEE First International Conference on. 241–246Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Russo M (2000) Genetic fuzzy learning. Evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans 4(3):259–273Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sheth PN, Uicker JJ (1971) A generalized symbolic notation for mechanisms. J Manuf Sci Eng 93(1):102–112Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Siegwart R, Nourbakhsh IR (2004) Autonomous mobile robots. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang S, Zhao H, and Hao X (2015, November) Design of an intelligent housekeeping robot based on IOT. In Intelligent Informatics and Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), 2015 International Conference on. 197–200Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Whitbrook AM, Aickelin U, Garibaldi JM (2007) IdIOTypic immune networks in mobile-robot control. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Trans 37(6):1581–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yong B, Zhang G, Chen H, Zhou Q (2016) Intelligent monitor system based on cloud and convolutional neural networks. J Supercomput:1–17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seongsoo Cho
    • 1
  • Bhanu Shrestha
    • 2
    Email author
  • Wook Jang
    • 3
  • Changho Seo
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringSoongsil UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Electronics EngineeringKwangwoon UniverversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Applied MathematicsKongju National UniversityKongjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations