Novel Temporal Perturbation-Based Privacy-Preserving Mechanism for Smart Meters

  • Xiaoyan Wang
  • Zhenquan XuEmail author
  • Ziwei Cai
  • Tao Wang


Smart meters provide strong data support for the intelligent construction of power grids but expose users’ privacy-sensitive information to adversaries. Thus, several mechanisms have been proposed for smart meter privacy protection. However, these existing mechanisms either lack consideration of the protection for customer power consumption mode or focus only on data security and ignore the data availability for intelligent services of smart meters. In this study, we propose a temporal perturbation-based privacy-preserving mechanism to achieve a balance between privacy security and data availability. The time disturbance model improves privacy security by staggering the acquisition and release time of smart meter data, destructs the load characteristics hidden in the power waveform, and realizes the fuzzification of real consumption events. Moreover, data availability for metering and billing, electronic scheduling and management, and value-added services is guaranteed. We analyze data availability and privacy security from theoretical and experimental perspectives, deduce a data availability analysis model, and introduce a non-intrusive load monitoring algorithm as a testing method for evaluating security performance. Evaluation results show that the proposed scheme performs well in protecting users’ consumption pattern and is resistant to attacks by load detection; it also ensures data availability when used for intelligent services.


Smart meter Privacy protection Data availability Time disturbance Non-intrusive load monitoring 



The research work reported in this paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41671443, 61701453), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042017kf0044), and LIESMARS Special Research Funding.


  1. 1.
    Fang X, Misra S, Xue G et al (2012) Smart grid — the new and improved power grid: a survey[J]. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 14(4):944–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayindir R, Hossain E, Vadi S (2016) The path of the smart grid -the new and improved power grid[C]// smart grid workshop and certificate program. IEEE :1–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalogridis G, Cepeda R, Denic SZ et al (2011) ElecPrivacy: evaluating the privacy protection of electricity management algorithms[J]. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2(4):750–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sankar L, Rajagopalan SR, Mohajer S et al (2013) Smart meter privacy: a theoretical framework[J]. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 4(2):837–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li X, Liang X, Lu R et al (2012) Securing smart grid: cyber attacks, countermeasures, and challenges[J]. Commun Mag IEEE 50(8):38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Asghar MR, Dán G, Miorandi D, et al. (2017) Smart meter data privacy: a survey[J]. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials (99):1–1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vuković O, Dán G, Bobba RB (2013) Confidentiality-preserving obfuscation for cloud-based power system contingency analysis[C]// IEEE international conference on smart grid communications. IEEE :432–437Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang Z, Qin Z, Zhu L, et al. (2017) Cost-friendly differential privacy for smart meters: exploiting the dual roles of the noise[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (99):1–1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kursawe K, Danezis G, Kohlweiss M (2011) Privacy-friendly aggregation for the smart-grid[C]// international conference on privacy enhancing technologies. Springer-Verlag :175–191Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Varodayan D, Khisti A (2011) Smart meter privacy using a rechargeable battery: minimizing the rate of information leakage[C]// IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing. IEEE :1932–1935Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li S, Khisti A, Mahajan A (2016) Privacy-optimal strategies for smart metering systems with a rechargeable battery[C]// American control conference. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Backes M, Meiser S (2014) Differentially private smart metering with battery recharging[M]// data privacy management and autonomous spontaneous security. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 194–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dwork C, Mcsherry F, Nissim K (2006) Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis[M]// theory of cryptography. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 637–648zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dwork C (2008) Differential privacy: a survey of results[C]// international conference on theory and applications of MODELS of computation. Springer-Verlag :1–19Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ni J, Zhang K, Alharbi K et al. (2017) Differentially private smart metering with fault tolerance and range-based filtering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid (99):1–1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao J, Jung T, Wang Y et al. (2014) Achieving differential privacy of data disclosure in the smart grid[C]// IEEE INFOCOM. IEEE, :504–512Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shuai L, Mengye L, Gaocheng L et al (2017) A novel distance metric: generalized relative entropy[J]. Entropy 19(6):269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Acs G, Castelluccia C (2011) I have a DREAM!(differentially private smartmetering)[C]//proceedings of the 13th international conference on information hiding.[s.l.]. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 118–132Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Paillier P (1999) Public-key cryptosystems based on composite degree residuosity classes[C]// advances in cryptology - EUROCRYPT '99, international conference on the theory and application of cryptographic techniques, Prague, Czech Republic, may 2-6, 1999, proceeding. DBLP :223–238Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu R, Liang X, Li X et al (2012) EPPA: an efficient and privacy-preserving aggregation scheme for secure smart grid communications[J]. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 23(9):1621–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ruj S, Nayak A (2013) A decentralized security framework for data aggregation and access control in smart grids[J]. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 4(1):196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lin HY, Tzeng WG, Shen ST et al. (2012) A practical smart metering system supporting privacy preserving billing and load monitoring[J]Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu S, Z Pan WF, Cheng* X (2017) Fractal generation method based on asymptote family of generalized Mandelbrot set and its application [J]. J Nonlinear Sci Appl 10(3):1148–1161MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu S, Fu W, He L et al (2017) Distribution of primary additional errors in fractal encoding method[J]. Multimed Tools Appl 76(4):5787–5802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beckel C, Kleiminger W, Cicchetti R, et al. (2014) The ECO data set and the performance of non-intrusive load monitoring algorithms[C]// ACM conference on embedded Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings. ACM :80–89Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhen X, Jinlong W, Guoru D et al. (2018) Device-to-device communications underlying UAV-supported social networking[J]. IEEE Access:1Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang Z, Guo X, Lin Y (2018) Trust management method of D2D communication based on RF fingerprint identification[J]. IEEE Access :1Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Batra N, Kelly J, Parson O, et al. (2014) NILMTK:an open source toolkit for non-intrusive load monitoring[C]// international conference on future energy systems. ACM :265–276Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zeifman M, Roth K (2011) Nonintrusive appliance load monitoring: review and outlook[J]. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 57(1):76–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lin Y, Zhu X, Zheng Z, et al. (2017) The individual identification method of wireless device based on dimensionality reduction and machine learning[J]. J Supercomput (5):1–18Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tan O, Gunduz D, Poor HV (2013) Increasing smart meter privacy through energy harvesting and storage devices[J]. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 31(7):1331–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fan L, Xiong L (2013) Adaptively sharing real-time aggregate with differential privacy. IEEE Trans Knowledge Data Eng (TKDE) 26(9):2094–2106Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ma X, Wang T, Lin Y et al. (2018) Parallel iterative inter-carrier interference cancellation in underwater acoustic orthogonal frequency division multiplexing[J]. Wirel Pers CommunGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bhotto MZA, Makonin S, Bajic I (2017) Load disaggregation based on aided linear integer programming[J]. IEEE Trans Circ Syst II Express Briefs (99):1Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tu Y, Lin Y, Wang J et al (2015) Semi-supervised learning with generative adversarial networks on digital signal modulation classification[J]. Comput Mater Continua 55(2):243–254Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yun L, Chao W, Jiaxing W et al (2016) A novel dynamic Spectrum access framework based on reinforcement learning for cognitive radio sensor networks[J]. Sensors 16(10):1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zoha A, Gluhak et al. (2012) Sensors, Vol. 12, Pages 16838–16866: Non-intrusive load monitoring approaches for disaggregated energy sensing: a survey[J]Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Weiss M, Helfenstein A, Mattern F et al Leveraging smart meter data to recognize home appliances[C]// IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications. IEEE 2012:190–197Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoyan Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhenquan Xu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ziwei Cai
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tao Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote SensingWuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  2. 2.Collaborative Innovation Center for Geospatial TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations