Advertisement

Full-Duplex Enabled Time-Efficient Device Discovery for Public Safety Communications

  • Zeeshan KaleemEmail author
  • Ajmal Khan
  • Syed Ali Hassan
  • Nguyen-Son Vo
  • Long D. Nguyen
  • Hien M. Nguyen
Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Device-to-device (D2D) communications is the integral part of public safety (PS) communications. However, the most important requirement is the users’ rapid discovery to timely communicate the emergency information. The existing half-duplex (HD) results in large time delays because it cannot transceive during same time slot. In-band full duplex (IB-FD) communications is an enabler to quickly discover the user because of simultaneous transmission and reception during same time-frequency block. In this paper, we proposed the frame structure for IB-FD system with prioritized PS users in resource allocation. Moreover, to improve spectral efficiency, time-efficient device discovery resource allocation (TE-DDRA) scheme has been proposed as well, where a user can switch the transmission mode from HD to IB-FD when the demand exceeds the available resources in HD mode. The proposal is validated by system-level simulations in terms of discovery time with conventional random access mode. The simulation results shows that with PS priority mode around 37% discovery time as compared with random access mode.

Keywords

Public safety communications 5G D2D discovery Time efficient discovery 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Newton Prize 2017.

References

  1. 1.
    3GPP (2014) Study on LTE device to device proximity services; radio aspects. Tech. rep., 3GPP TR 36.843 v 12.0.1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    3GPP (2015) LTE device to device proximity services; user equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception. Tech. rep., 3GPP TR 36.877 v 2.0.0Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmad A, Khan MTR, Kaleem Z (2016) Uplink optimal power allocation for heterogeneous multiuser SIMO SC-FDMA networks. Electron Lett 52(24):1990–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmad I, Kaleem Z, Narmeen R, Nguyen LD, Ha DB (2019) Quality-of-service aware game theory-based uplink power control for 5G heterogeneous networks. Mobile Netw Appl 24(2):556–563Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Albasry H, Ahmed QZ (2016) Network-assisted D2D discovery method by using efficient power control strategy. In: IEEE 83Rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andrews JG, Buzzi S, Choi W, Hanly SV, Lozano A, Soong AC, Zhang J (2014) What will 5G be. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 32(6):1065–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anwar MZ, Kaleem Z, Jamalipour A (2019) Machine learning inspired sound-based amateur drone detection for public safety applications. IEEE Trans Veh TechGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deng Y, Kim KJ, Duong TQ, Elkashlan M, Karagiannidis GK, Nallanathan A (2016) Full-duplex spectrum sharing in cooperative single carrier systems. IEEE Trans Cogn Commun Netw 2(1):68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doan XT, Nguyen N, Yin C, Da Costa DB, Duong TQ (2017) Cognitive full-duplex relay networks under the peak interference power constraint of multiple primary users. EURASIP J Wirel Com Netw 2017(1):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Feng D, Lu L, Yuan-Wu Y, Li GY, Li S, Feng G (2014) Device-to-device communications in cellular networks. IEEE Commun Mag 52(4):49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heino M, Korpi D, Huusari T, Antonio-Rodriguez E, Venkatasubramanian S, Riihonen T, Anttila L, Icheln C, Haneda K, Wichman R et al (2015) Recent advances in antenna design and interference cancellation algorithms for in-band full duplex relays. IEEE Commun Mag 53(5):91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hong J, Park S, Choi S (2016) Novel power control and collision resolution schemes for device-to-device discovery. Peer Peer Netw Appl 9(5):913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hu L (2014) Resource allocation for network-assisted device-to-device discovery. In: International conference on wireless communications, vehicular technology, information theory and aerospace & electronic systems (VITAE). IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ITU, R.I.R.M.: 1225 (1998) guidelines for evaluation of radio transmission technologies for imt- 2000 systems. International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation ITUGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaleem Z, Ahmad A, Rehmani MH (2018) Neighbors’ interference situation-aware power control scheme for dense 5G mobile communication system. Telecommun Syst 67(3):443–450Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaleem Z, Chang K (2016) Public safety priority-based user association for load balancing and interference reduction in PS-LTE systems. IEEE Access 4:9775–9785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaleem Z, Chang K (2018) QoS priority-based coordinated scheduling and hybrid spectrum access for femtocells in dense cooperative 5G cellular networks. Trans Emerging Tel Tech 29(1):1–17Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kaleem Z, Hui B, Chang K (2014) QoS priority-based dynamic frequency band allocation algorithm for load balancing and interference avoidance in 3GPP LTE HetNet. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw 2014(1):185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kaleem Z, Khaliq MZ, Khan A, Ahmad I, Duong TQ (2018) PS-CARA: context-aware resource allocation scheme for mobile public safety networks. Sensors 18(5):1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kaleem Z, Li Y, Chang K (2016) Public safety users’ priority-based energy and time-efficient device discovery scheme with contention resolution for prose in third generation partnership project long-term evolution-advanced systems. IET Commun 10(15):1873–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaleem Z, Qadri NN, Duong TQ, Karagiannidis GK (2019) Energy-efficient device discovery in D2D cellular networks for public safety scenario. IEEE Syst J: 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2019.2899922
  22. 22.
    Kaleem Z, Rehmani MH (2018) Amateur drone monitoring: State-of-the-art architectures, key enabling technologies, and future research directions. IEEE Wirel Commun 25(2): 150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaleem Z, Yousaf M, Qamar A, Ahmad A, Duong TQ, Choi W, Jamalipour A (2019) UAV-empowered disaster-resilient edge architecture for delay-sensitive communication. arXiv:1809.09617
  24. 24.
    Kim W, Kaleem Z, Chang K (2015) Power headroom report-based uplink power control in 3GPP LTE-a HetNet. EURASIP J Wirel Com Netw 2015(1):233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kim W, Kaleem Z, Chang K (2015) UE-specific interference-aware open-loop power control in 3GPP LTE-A uplink HetNet. In: International conference on ubiquitous and future networks (ICUFN). IEEE, pp 682–684Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim W, Kaleem Z, Chang K (2017) Interference-aware uplink power control in 3GPP LTE-a HetNet. Wireless Pers Commun 94(3):1057–1071Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li Y, Kaleem Z, Chang K (2016) Interference-aware resource-sharing scheme for multiple d2d group communications underlaying cellular networks. Wirel Pers Commun 90(2):749–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nguyen LD, Kortun A, Duong TQ (2018) An introduction of real-time embedded optimisation programming for uav systems under disaster communication EAI Endorsed Transactions on Industrial Networks and Intelligent Systems 5(17).  https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-12-2018.156080
  29. 29.
    Nguyen MN, Nguyen LD, Duong TQ, Tuan HD (2019) Real-time optimal resource allocation for embedded UAV communication systems. IEEE Wire Commun Lett 8(1):225–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nguyen N, Choi KW, Song L, Han Z (2018) ROOMMATEs: An unsupervised indoor peer discovery approach for LTE D2D communications. IEEE Trans Veh TechnolGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nguyen N, Kundu C, Ngo HQ, Duong TQ, Canberk B (2016) Secure full-duplex small-cell networks in a spectrum sharing environment. IEEE Access 4:3087–3099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Nguyen N, Ngo HQ, Duong TQ, Tuan HD, da Costa DB (2017) Full-duplex cyber-weapon with massive arrays. IEEE Trans Commun 65(12):5544–5558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen VD, Duong TQ, Tuan HD, Shin OS, Poor HV (2017) Spectral and energy efficiencies in full-duplex wireless information and power transfer. IEEE Trans Commun 65(5): 2220–2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Simsek M, Merwaday A, Correal N, Guvenc I (2013) Device-to-device discovery based on 3GPP system level simulations. In: Globecom workshops (GC wkshps). IEEE, pp 555– 560Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tam HHM, Tuan HD, Nasir AA, Duong TQ, Poor HV (2017) MIMO energy harvesting in full-duplex multi-user networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 16(5):3282–3297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xenakis D, Kountouris M, Merakos L, Passas N, Verikoukis C (2016) Performance analysis of network-assisted D2D discovery in random spatial networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 15(8):5695–5707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang B, Li Y, Jin D, Hui P, Han Z (2015) Social-aware peer discovery for D2D communications underlaying cellular networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 14(5):2426–2439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang J, Deng L, Li X, Zhou Y, Liang Y, Liu Y (2017) Novel device-to-device discovery scheme based on random backoff in LTE-advanced networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(12): 11404–11408Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang T, Cai Y, Huang Y, Duong TQ, Yang W (2017) Secure full-duplex spectrum-sharing wiretap networks with different antenna reception schemes. IEEE Trans Commun 65(1):335–346Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentCOMSATS University IslamabadWah CampusPakistan
  2. 2.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentCOMSATS University IslamabadAttock CampusPakistan
  3. 3.School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (SEECS)National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST)IslamabadPakistan
  4. 4.Duy Tan UniversityDuy TanVietnam
  5. 5.Queen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations