Advertisement

Data Transmission Using IoT in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks in Smart City Congestion

  • Muhammad Asim SaleemEmail author
  • Zhou ShijieEmail author
  • Abida Sharif
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Development of Internet of Things (IoT) enables smart city advancement throughout the world. Increasing number of vehicles has brought focus on road safety precautions and in-vehicle communication. This is the right time to focus on the development of new applications and services for vehicular environments. The Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) are an interesting range of Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) where the Vehicle to Vehicle (V2V) and vehicle roadways transmission is possible. The V2V scheme is fresh by combining Wireless Fidelity (Wi-Fi), Bluetooth and other all sorts of communication standards. An immense number of nodes working with these networks and due to their immense displacements, the analysis is prevailing regarding the possibility of routing standards. The estimation of conventional routing standards for MANETs illustrates that their behaviors are minimal in VANETs. The intention is to make use of mediators for routing with an effort to address the before described issues. The mediators are accountable for gathering data related to routing and identifying the optimal paths for forwarding information packets. The routing scheme is based on group routing standards and data cluster framework for locating the best possible routes. In this paper, we analyze smart cities vehicle communication development by implementing IoT. We also discuss the ways to minimize the limitations connected to IoT deployment and implementation in smart city environment using multi mediator scheme.

Keywords

VANET Smart City Network congestion Internet of things Routing 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Talreja R, Sathish S, Nenwani K, Saxena K (2016) Trust and behavior based system to prevent collision in IoT enabled VANET," 2016 International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES), Paralakhemundi, pp. 1588–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOPES.2016.7955707
  2. 2.
    Hasson ST, Hasan ZY (2017) Roads clustering approach’s in VANET models. 2017 annual conference on new trends in information & communications technology applications (NTICT), Baghdad, pp. 316–321. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1109/NTICT.2017.7976140
  3. 3.
    Lazar SA, Stefan CE Future Vehicular networks: What control technologies? vol 2016. 2016 International Conference on Communications (COMM), Bucharest, pp 337–340.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICComm.2016.7528203
  4. 4.
    Chatrapathi C, Rajkumar MN, Venkatesakumar V (2015) VANET based integrated framework for smart accident management system. 2015 International Conference on Soft-Computing and Networks Security (ICSNS), Coimbatore, pp 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSNS.2015.7292411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anandakumar H, Umamaheswari K (2017) Supervised machine learning techniques in cognitive radio networks during cooperative spectrum handovers. Clust Comput 20(2):1505–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ayyappan B, Kumar PM (2016) Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET): Architectures, methodologies and design issues. 2016 Second International Conference on Science Technology Engineering and Management (ICONSTEM), Chennai, pp 177–180.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONSTEM.2016.7560946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Talreja R, Sathish S, Nenwani K, Saxena K (2016) Trust and behavior based system to prevent collision in IoT enabled VANET. 2016 International Conference on Signal Processing, Communication, Power and Embedded System (SCOPES), Paralakhemundi, pp 1588–1591.  https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOPES.2016.7955707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abdelgadir M, Saeed R, Babiker A (2016) Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) dynamic performance estimation routing model for city scenarios. 2016 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT), Tashkent, pp 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISCT.2016.7777397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xie S, Hu X, Xin Z, Li L Time-Efficient Stochastic Model Predictive Energy Management for a Plug-In Hybrid Electric Bus with Adaptive Reference State-of-Charge Advisory. IEEE Trans Veh Technol PP(99):1.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2798662
  10. 10.
    Anandakumar H, Umamaheswari K (2017) An Efficient Optimized Handover in Cognitive Radio Networks using Cooperative Spectrum sensing. Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10798587.2017.1364931
  11. 11.
    Khayamy M, Chaoui H (2018) Efficient PMSM Inverter-Based Drive for Vehicular Transportation Systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol PP(99):1.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2018.2798359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ucar S, Ergen SC, Ozkasap O (2016) Multihop-Cluster-Based IEEE 802.11p and LTE Hybrid Architecture for VANET Safety Message Dissemination. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(4):2621–2636.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2015.2421277 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ji J, Khajepour A, Melek WW, Huang Y (2017) Path Planning and Tracking for Vehicle Collision Avoidance Based on Model Predictive Control With Multiconstraints. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(2):952–964.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2555853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang L, Peng H, Li GY, Shen X (2017) Vehicular Communications: A Physical Layer Perspective. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(12):10647–10659.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2750903 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arulmurugan R, Sabarmathi KR, Anandakumar H (2017) Classification of sentence level sentiment analysis using cloud machine learning techniques. Clust Comput.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-017-1200-1
  16. 16.
    Zhu L, He Y, Yu FR, Ning B, Tang T, Zhao N (2017) Communication-Based Train Control System Performance Optimization Using Deep Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(12):10705–10717.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2724060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang C, Yu FR, Liang C, Chen Q, Tang L (2017) Joint Computation Offloading and Interference Management in Wireless Cellular Networks with Mobile Edge Computing. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(8):7432–7445.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2672701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anandakumar H, Umamaheswari K (2017) A bio-inspired swarm intelligence technique for social aware cognitive radio handovers. Comput Electr Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.09.016
  19. 19.
    Cui J, Zhang J, Zhong H, Xu Y (2017) SPACF: A Secure Privacy-Preserving Authentication Scheme for VANET With Cuckoo Filter. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(11):10283–10295.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2718101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hou X, Li Y, Chen M, Wu D, Jin D, Chen S (2016) Vehicular Fog Computing: A Viewpoint of Vehicles as the Infrastructures. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 65(6):3860–3873.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2532863 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhang C, Huang Y, Jing Y, Yang L (2017) Energy Efficient Beamforming for Massive MIMO Public Channel. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(11):10595–10600.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2756994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharif A, Li JP, Sharif MI (2018) Internet of Things network cognition and traffic management system. Cluster Computing 1–9Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ying B, Nayak A (2017) Anonymous and Lightweight Authentication for Secure Vehicular Networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(12):10626–10636.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2017.2744182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information and Software EngineeringUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina

Personalised recommendations