Advertisement

Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 504–516 | Cite as

State Management Function Placement for Service-Based 5G Mobile Core Architecture

  • Truong-Xuan DoEmail author
  • Younghan Kim
Article
  • 179 Downloads

Abstract

Service-based 5G core architecture is designed to take advantages of network function virtualization and software-defined networking. In addition to the control and data plane separation, the service-based 5G core decouples the computing and storage resources which separates the mobile functions into two categories: “stateless” control functions and state management functions. Such new features improve 5G core network in terms of independent scalability and fast failure recovery. In geo-distributed cloud infrastructure-based 5G core networks, the “stateless” control functions can be deployed to all cloud centers close to access networks to reduce latency and traffic load burden. However, we can not deploy state management functions to all cloud centers which results in the high state transfer cost. In addition, we can not use only one state management function for entire network which results in high traffic load burden. Therefore, the placement of state management functions involves different conflicting design objectives which requires a new model to optimally place these functions. In this paper, we propose a multi-objective model which can achieve the balance between state transfer cost and traffic load burden on state management functions. We first solve our model using εconstraint approach which tries to optimize one objective while keeping another under threshold. Second, we propose an adaptive solution based on adaptive weighted sum approach to find a set of Pareto optimal solutions for our multi-objective model. Simulation results show that our proposed solution offers better balance between two design objectives compared to other solutions.

Keywords

Service-based 5G core network Unstructured data storage function Stateless function Network function virtualization 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Institute for Information and communications Technology Promotion(IITP) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (No. IITP-2018-2017-0-01633, ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) and No.2017-0-00613, Development of Content-oriented Delay Tolerant networking in Multi-access Edge Computing Environment)

References

  1. 1.
    (2013) Network Function Virtualization (NFV), Architecture framework, ETSI GS NFV 002 v 1.1.1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    (2014) Network Function Virtualization (NFV), Management and Orchestration, ETSI GS NFV-MAN 001 v 1.1.1Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    (2017) Architecture enhancements for control and user plane separation of EPC nodes, TS 23.214 v15.0.0Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    (2017) Procedures for the 5G System, 3GPP TS 23.502 v1.3.0Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    (2017) System Architecture for the 5G System, 3GPP TS 23.501 v1.4.0Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baba H, Matsumoto M, Noritake K (2015) Lightweight virtualized evolved packet core architecture for future mobile communication. In: Proceedings of IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC). New Orleans, pp 1812–1816Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bagaa M, Taleb T, Ksentini A (2014) Service-aware network function placement for efficient traffic handling in carrier cloud. In: 2014 IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC). Istanbul, pp 2402–2407Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Basta A, Kellerer W, Hoffmann M, Morper HJ, Hoffmann K (2014) Applying NFV and SDN to LTE mobile core gateways, the functions placement problem. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on all things cellular: operations, applications, and challenges. Chicago, pp 33–38Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Basta A, Blenk A, Hoffmann K, Morper HJ, Hoffmann M, Kellerer W (2017) Towards a cost optimal design for a 5G mobile core network based on SDN and NFV. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 14:1061–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baumgartner A, Reddy VS, Bauschert T (2015) Mobile core network virtualization: a model for combined virtual core network function placement and topology optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2015 1st IEEE conference on network softwarization (NetSoft). London, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen M, Qian Y, Mao S, Tang W, Yang X (2016) Software-defined mobile networks security. Mob Netw Appl 21(5):729–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Do TX, Nguyen VG, Kim Y (2016) SDN-based mobile packet core for multicast and broadcast services. Wireless NetworksGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erel M, Teoman E, Özçevik Y, Seçinti G, Canberk B (2015) Scalability analysis and flow admission control in mininet-based sdn environment. In: 2015 IEEE conference on network function virtualization and software defined network (NFV-SDN). San Francisco, pp 18–19Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gurobi Optimization I (2017) Gurobi optimizer reference manual. http://www.gurobi.com
  15. 15.
    Kiess W, An A, Beker S (2015) Software-as-a-service for the virtualization of mobile network gateways. In: Proceedings of IEEE global communications conference (GLOBECOM 2015). San Diego, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lange S, Gebert S, Zinner T, Tran-Gia P, Hock D, Jarschel M, Hoffmann M (2015) Heuristic approaches to the controller placement problem in large scale SDN networks. IEEE Trans Netw Serv Manag 12:4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mavromatis I, Tassi A, Rigazzi G, Piechocki RJ, Nix A (2018) Multi-radio 5g architecture for connected and autonomous vehicles: application and design insights. EAI Endorsed Trans Indus Netw Intell Syst 4:13Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    NGMN P1 WS1 E2E Architecture Team (2016) Description of network slicing concept. Tech. rep., NGMN AllianceGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nguyen LD (2018) Resource allocation for energy efficiency in 5g wireless networks. EAI Endorsed Trans Indus Netw Intell Syst 5:14Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nguyen N, Duong TQ, Ngo HQ, Hadzi-Velkov Z, Shu L (2016) Secure 5g wireless communications: a joint relay selection and wireless power transfer approach. IEEE Access 4:3349–3359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nguyen VG, Do TX, Kim Y (2016) SDN and virtualization-based LTE mobile network architectures: a comprehensive survey. Wirel Pers Commun 86(3):1401–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nguyen VG, Brunstrom A, Grinnemo KJ, Taheri J (2017) SDN/NFV-based mobile packet core network architectures: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 19(3):1567–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Obadia M, Bouet M, Rougier JL, Iannone L (2015) A greedy approach for minimizing SDN control overhead. In: Proceedings of the 2015 1st IEEE conference on network softwarization (NetSoft). London, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Open Networking Foundation (2014) SDN architecture. ONF TR-502Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paper CW (2017) Evolving the mobile core to being cloud nativeGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pentikousis K, Wang Y, Hu W (2013) Mobileflow: toward software-defined mobile networks. IEEE Commun Mag 51(7):44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Secinti G, Canberk B, Duong TQ, Shu L (2017) Software defined architecture for vanet: a testbed implementation with wireless access management. IEEE Commun Mag 55(7):135–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steffen G, David H, Thomas Z, Phuoc TG, Marco H, Michael J, Ernst-Dieter S, Banse R-PB (2014) Demonstrating the optimal placement of virtualized cellular network functions in case of large crowd events. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on SIGCOMM. New York, pp 359–360Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taleb T, Ksentini A (2013) Gateway relocation avoidance-aware network function placement in carrier cloud. In: Proceedings of the 16th ACM international conference on modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems. BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taleb T, Bagaa M, Ksentini A (2015) User mobility-aware virtual network function placement for virtual 5g network infrastructure. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC). London, pp 3879–3884Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vo N, Duong TQ, Guizani M, Kortun A (2018) 5g optimized caching and downlink resource sharing for smart cities. IEEE Access 6:31,457–31,468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vo N, Duong TQ, Tuan HD, Kortun A (2018) Optimal video streaming in dense 5g networks with d2d communications. IEEE Access 6:209–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Weck O, Kim IY (2005) Adaptive weighted sum method for bi-objective optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 29(2):149–158Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xin J, Erran LL, Laurent V, Jennifer R (2013) SoftCell: scalable and flexible cellular core network architecture. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Acm conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies. Santa Barbara, pp 163–174Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Soongsil UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations