The Analysis of the Slovak Citizens’ Awareness about the Smart City Concept

  • Dagmar Cagáňová
  • Augustín Stareček
  • Natália HorňákováEmail author
  • Petra Hlásniková


An icreasing number of citizens living in cities and their demands for high quality of life and standard of living requires the implementation of smart solutions. Not only the world metropolis but also cities in the Slovak Republic implement the elements of the concept into their cities. Despite the efforts of local governments to improve residents’ lives through various projects oriented on smart elements, the issue of the lack of citizens’ awareness about the Smart City concept and the possibility of their engaging in building a better and smarter city remains. The mentioned issue also results from the survey conducted by the authors of the paper. The main aim of the paper is to analyze the awareness of regional cities’ citizens in the Slovak Republic about the Smart City concept and to propose the recommendations for improving the implementation of the Smart City elements into cities. The survey showed that almost 65 % of the respondents do not know what the term Smart City stands for. Based on the results, the authors recommend better enlightenment and publicity of the Smart City concept among citizens. Only informed and actively involved citizens can bring creative and innovative solutions that can make Smart City implementation more efficient or effective. A questionnaire was created to collect the necessary data. The questionnaire was distributed by the improbable quote selection of randomly addressed citizens in regional cities of the Slovak Republic. The collected data were evaluated by using the statistical program SPSS and MS Excel.


Smart City Concept Citizens Slovakia Regional cities 



The paper is a part of submitted KEGA project “E-platform for improving Collaboration among Universities and Industrial Enterprises in the Area of Education” Project Nr. 030STU-4/2018.


  1. 1.
    Chovanova HH, Babcanova D, Samakova J, Korshunov AI, Mesarosova J (2017) Solving distribution problems with computer technology. In: Managerial trends in the development of enterprises in globalization era, pp 104–115. ISBN 978-80-552-1739-0Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bawa M, Cagáňová D, Szilva I, Špirková D (2015) Importance of internet of things and big data in building smart city and what would be its challenges. In: Smart City 360° : first EAI international summit, Smart City 360°, Bratislava, Slovakia and Toronto, Canada. Revised selected papers, pp 605–616. ISSN 1867-8211Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Žlábek J, Dado M, Špaček R (2015) Inteligentné riešenia pre mestá a obce. [cit. 08-07-2017]. Online:
  5. 5.
    Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Arribas D (2012) Smart cities in perspective – a comparative European study by means of self organizing maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 25:229–246Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sabri S, Rajabifard A, Ho S, Namazi-Rad MR, Pettit C (2015) Alternative planning and land administration for future Smart Cities. In: IEEE technology and society magazine, vol 34, issue 4, pp 33–73.
  7. 7.
    Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H, Meijers E, Piichler-Milhanovic N (2007) Smart cities: ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akiner ME (2016) Smart cities transformation in Turkey. In: New arch-international journal of contemporary architecture, vol 3, issue 3, p 8–16.
  9. 9.
    Jurenka R, Cagáňová D, Horňáková N, Stareček A (2016) Smart City in Terms of Social Innovation and Human Capital. In: The second EAI International Summit, Smart City 360°, Bratislava, Slovakia, 2016Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cagáňová D et al (2015) Innovation in industrial enterprises and intercultural management. University of Zielona Góra, Zielona Góra. ISBN 978-83-933843-4-1Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caragliu A, De Bo C, Nijkamp P (2009) Smart cities in Europe. Italy: 3rd Central European Conference in RegionalScienceGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bauer R (2016) CESCI-Carpathia [cit. 02-09-2017] Online:
  13. 13.
    Ojasalo J, Tahtinen L (2016) Integrating open innovation platforms in public sector decision making: empirical results from Smart City research. In: Technology innovation management review, vol 6, issue 12, pp 38–48Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Špirková D, Cagáňová D (2014) Smart housing in sustainable development. In: Internet of Things.IoT infrastructures. Part 2.LNICST 151,2015: first international summit, IoT360, Rome. Institute for Computer Sciences, Rome, pp 52–59. ISBN 978-3-319-19742-5Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mapa rozdelenia samosprávnych krajov Slovenskej republiky. [cit. 02-07-2017] Online:
  17. 17.
    Petr P (2012) IBM SPSS Statistics 19 a IBM SPSS Modeler 14 – Stručný návod k ovládaní. [cit. 02-07-2017] Online:;jsessionid=398F205BE66796486971C24FC41D5A33?sequence=1
  18. 18.
    Leard Statistics. Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation. [cit. 02-07-2017] Online:
  19. 19.
    Pearson’s chi-square test [cit. 06-07-2017] Online:

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dagmar Cagáňová
    • 1
  • Augustín Stareček
    • 1
  • Natália Horňáková
    • 1
    Email author
  • Petra Hlásniková
    • 1
  1. 1.Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology in TrnavaInstitute of Industrial Engineering and ManagementTrnavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations