Advertisement

Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 940–955 | Cite as

Modelling Green Femtocells in Smart-grids

  • Fadi M. Al-Turjman
Article
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

On going demands to connect massive amounts of the heterogeneous mobile devices and data traffics make the mobile operators in desperate need to find energy-efficient solutions for coverage and real-time services. Accordingly, mobile femtocells are found to be a promising solution in the coming few decades. This paper presents energy-based analysis for mobile femtocells in Ultra-Large Scale (ULS) applications such as the smart-grid. The potential reduction of the consumed energy and service interruption due to mobility and multihop communication effects are considered as well as various performance metrics such as throughput, availability, and delay. In that sense the smart-grid is modeled as a green wireless communication system for traffic offloading while considering mobility of the femtocell base-station (FBS) as well as the FBS cut-offs for energy-saving aspects. A typical scenario, called e-Mobility, is considered as a case study where a set of mobile femtocells are utilized inside a single macrocell in order to achieve optimized utilities’ usage. Numerical results achieved from the proposed smart-grid model have been verified and validated via extensive simulation results while considering typical operational conditions/parameters.

Keywords

Femtocells Queuing theory Green-LTE Smart-grid Cellular radio modeling 

References

  1. 1.
    CISCO, “Cisco Visual Networking Index (VNI): VNI Mobile Forecast Highlights”, 2015-2020, http://www.cisco.com/assets/sol/sp/vni/forecast_highlights_mobile/index.html, 2016
  2. 2.
    Singh G, Al-Turjman F (2016) Learning Data Delivery Paths in QoI-Aware Information-Centric Sensor Networks. IEEE Internet of Things J 3(4):572–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morte M (2016) E-mobility and multiagent systems in smart grid In Proc. Of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Electric Power Engineering (EPE), Karlsruhe, Germany, pp. 1-4Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Banote A, Ubale V, Khaire G (2013) Energy Efficient Communication Using Femtocell- A review. Int J Electron, Commun Instrum Eng Res Dev 3(1):229–236Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Fagih A et al (2013) A priced public sensing framework for heterogeneous IoT architectures. IEEE Trans Emer Top Comp 1(1):133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bou-Harb E et al (2013) Communication security for smart grid distribution networks. IEEE Commun Mag 51(1):42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qutqut M et. al. (2014) Dynamic small cell placement strategies for LTE Heterogeneous Networks, In Proc. of the IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Madeira, Portugal, 1-6Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qutqut M et. al. (2013) MFW: Mobile femto-cells utilizing WiFi, In proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications (ICC), Budapest, Hungary, 5020–5024Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasan MZ et al (2017) A Survey on Multipath Routing Protocols for QoS Assurances in Real-Time Multimedia Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials.  https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2661201
  10. 10.
    Law A (2007) Statistical analysis of simulation output data: the practical state of the art, In Proc. Of the IEEE Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, USA, 77–83Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arshad M, Vastberg A, Edler T (2012) Energy Efficiency Gains Through Traffic Offloading and Traffic Expansion in Joint Macro Pico Deployment In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Wireless Communications and Networking (WCNC), Paris, France, 2203-2208Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Riggio R, Leith D (2012) A measurement-based model of energy consumption in femtocells. In Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Wireless Days, Dublin, Ireland, 1-5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Marsan M, Meo M (2014) Queueing systems to study the energy consumption of a campus WLAN. Comput Netw 66(1):82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silva A, Meo M, Marsan M (2012) Energy-performance trade-off in dense WLANs: A queuing study. Comput Netw 56(1):2522–2537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ambene G, Anni G (2014) Queuing Theory and TelecommunicationsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bolch G et. al. (2006) Queueing networks and Markov chains: modeling and performance evaluation with computer science applications, John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elkourdi T, Simeone O (2011) Femtocell as a relay: An outage analysis. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 10(12):4204–4213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Al-Turjman F (2016) Information-centric sensor networks for cognitive IoT: an overview. Ann Telecommun 72(1):1–16Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gong J, Zhou S, Niu Z (2011) Queuing on energy-efficient wireless transmissions with adaptive modulation and coding, In Proc. Of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications (ICC), Kyoto, Japan, 1–5Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borodakiy V et. al. (2014) Modelling and performance analysis of pre-emption based radio admission control scheme for video conferencing over LTE, In Proc. Of the ITU Kaleidoscope Academic Conference, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 53–59Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chowdhury M et. al. (2011) Service quality improvement of mobile users in vehicular environment by mobile femtocell network deployment, In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on ICT Convergence (ICTC), Seoul, Korea, 194–198Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karimi O, Liu J, Wang C (2012) Seamless wireless connectivity for multimedia services in high speed trains. IEEE Sel Areas Commun 30(4):729–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saghezchi F, Radwan A, Rodriguez J (2017) Energy-aware relay selection in cooperative wireless networks: An assignment game approach. Ad Hoc Netw 56(1):96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Baloch R et al (2010) A mathematical model for wireless channel allocation and handoff schemes. Telecommun Syst 45(4):275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zeng Q, Agrawal D (2002) Modeling and efficient handling of handoffs in integrated wireless mobile networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 51(6):1469–1478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sucasas V (2016) A survey on clustering techniques for cooperative wireless networks. Ad Hoc Netw 47(1):53–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mukherjee A et al (2013) Femtocell based green power consumption methods for mobile network. Comput Netw 57(1):162–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Trivedi K, Dharmaraja S, Ma X (2002) Analytic modeling of handoffs in wireless cellular networks. Inf Sci 148:155–166MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    El Bouabidi I et al (2014) Design and analysis of secure host-based mobility protocol for wireless heterogeneous networks. J Supercomput 70(1):1036–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Beigy H, Meybodi M (2015) A learning automata-based adaptive uniform fractional guard channel algorithm. J Supercomput 71(1):871–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Al-Turjman F, Hassanein H (2012) Towards augmented connectivity with delay constraints in WSN federation. Int J Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput 11(2):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singh G, Al-Turjman F (2016) A data delivery framework for cognitive information-centric sensor networks in smart outdoor monitoring. Comput Commun 74(1):38–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Deruyck M et. al. (2012) Modelling the power consumption in femtocell networks, In Proc. Of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Paris, France, 30-35Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang W, Shen G (2010) Energy efficiency of heterogeneous cellular network, In Proc. Of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 1–5Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chakka R (1998) Spectral expansion solution for some finite capacity queues. Ann Oper Res 79:27–44MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhang J et al. (2010) Femtocells: technologies and deployment, Wiley Online LibraryGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Qutqut M et al. (2013) HOF: A History-based Offloading Framework for LTE Networks Using Mobile Small Cells and WiFi, In Proc. of the IEEE Local Computer Networks (LCN), Sydney, Australia, 77-83Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Solmaz G, Akbas M, Turgut D (2015) A Mobility Model of Theme Park Visitors. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 14(12):2406–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer EngineeringMiddle East Technical UniversityMersin 10Turkey

Personalised recommendations