Advertisement

Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 407–419 | Cite as

Influence of Krylov subspace in Graph Isomorphism for Mobile Networks

  • T. RamrajEmail author
  • R. Prabhakar
Article
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Identification of isomorphism among graphs is one of the computationally challenging tasks in computer science that couldn’t be solved in polynomial time. In this paper, we derive a polynomial time algorithm that allows direct comparison between different graph structures to check for graph isomorphism. This paper suggest to represent graphs in a common mathematical space (Symmetric Positive Semi-Definite space), so that two isomorphic graphs always map to the same coordinates in a mathematical space. This kind of mathematical representation is generated based on the neighbourhood influences between nodes of a graph which enhances the graph topological structure at the node level in the form of krylov subspace, in polynomial time. Experiments are conducted using publicly available benchmark graph database. From the simulation, it is observed that the representation recommended in this work acts like a signature for each graph with guaranteed isomorphism. Further the proposed approach tries to identify the molecular structure of any application-specific graphs and categorizes them effectively in a polynomial time inspite of its NP-completeness.

Keywords

Graph Matching Graph Isomorphism Krylov Subspace Polynomial time Mathematical space 

References

  1. 1.
    Pelillo M (1999) Replicator equations, maximal cliques, and graph isomorphism. Neural Comput 11(8):1933–1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conte D, Foggia P, Sansone C, Vento M (2004) Thirty years of graph matching in pattern recognition. Intl J Patt Recog Art Intel 18(3):265–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinheiro MA, Kybic J (2016) Geometric graph matching using monte carlo tree search. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach IntGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gori M, Maggini M, Sarti L (2005) Exact and approximate graph matching using random walks. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Int 27(7)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tuzel O, Porikli F, Meer P (2006) Region covariance: a fast descriptor for detection and classification. Proc European Conf Comput VisGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porikli F, Tuzel O (2006) Covariance tracker. Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Patt RecognGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pang Y, Yuan Y, Li X (2008) Gabor-Based Region Covariance Matrices for Face Recognition. IEEE Trans Circ Syst Video Technol 18(7):989–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ullmann, Julian R (2010) Bit-vector algorithms for binary constraint satisfaction and subgraph isomorphism. J Exp AlgorithGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aho AV, Hopcroft JE, Ullman JD (1974) The design and analysis of computer algorithms. Add WesleyGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hopcroft JE, Wong J (1974) Linear time algorithm for isomorphism of planar graphs. Proc 6th Ann ACM Symposium Theory Comput 172–184Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dickinson PJ, Bunke H, Dadej A, Kraetzl M (2004) Matching graphs with unique node labels. Pattern Anal Applic 7(3):243–254MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiang X, Bunke H (1999) Optimal quadratic-time isomorphism of ordered graphs. Pattern Recogn 32(17):1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luks EM (1982) Isomorphism of graphs of bounded valence can be tested in polynomial time. J Comput Syst Sci 25(1):42–65MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cordella LP, Foggia P, Sansone C, Vento M (1999) Performance evaluation of the vf graph matching algorithm. Proc. 10th Int’l Conf Image Anal Proc 1172–1177Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cordella LP, Foggia P, Sansone C, Vento M (2004) A (sub)graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel 26(20):1367–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Messmer BT, Bunke H (1999) A decision tree approach to graph and subgraph isomorphism detection. Pattern Recogn 32(12):1979–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    He H, Singh AK (2008) Graphs-at-a-time: query language and access methods for graph databases. SIGMOD-08 405–418Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang S, Li S, Yang J (2009) GADDI: distance index based subgraph matching in biological networks. EDBT 192–203Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao P, Han J (2010) On graph query optimization in large networks. PVLDB 3(1):340–351Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ambauen R, Fischer S Bunke H (2003) Graph edit distance with node splitting and merging and its application to diatom identification. In Proc 4th Intl. workshop on Graph Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, LNCS 2726, Springer. 95–106Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cherian A, Sra S, Banerjee A, Papanikolopoulos N (2013) Jensen- Bregman LogDet divergence with application to efficient similarity search for covariance matrices. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Mach Intel 35(9)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Querido T, Loiola EM, De Abreu NM, Boaventura-Netto PO, Hahn P (2007) A survey for the quadratic assignment problem. EJOR 657–690Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hyuk Cha S (2007) Comprehensive survey on distance / similarity measures between probability density functions. Int J Math Model Methods Appl Sci 1(4):300–307Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Jong KA, Spears WM (1989) Using genetic algorithm to solve NP-complete problems. Proc Int’l Conf Genet Algorithms 124–132Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aalo Y, Bronstein A, Kimmel R (2015) On convex relaxation of graph isomorphism. Proc Ntnl Acad Sci 112(10):2942–2947MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shrivastava A, Li P (1996) A new space for comparing graphs. IEEE/ ACM Intl Conf Adv Soc Netw Anal MiningGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang J, Wang H, Zhou Y, McDonald N (2015) Multiple Kernel Multivariate Performance Learning Using Cutting Plane Algorithm IEEE Intl Conf on Syst Man Cybernet 187–1875Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yang X, Yu Q, He L, Guo T (2013) The one-against-all partition based binary tree support vector machine algorithms for multi-class classification. Neurocomputing 113:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aflalo Y, Brezis H, Kimmel R (2015) On the optimality of shape and data representation in the spectral domain. SIAM J Imaging Sci 8(2):1141–1160MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li Z, Liu J, Tang J (2015) Robust Structured Subspace Learning for Data Representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 37(10):2085–2098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Krylov AN (1931) On the numerical solution of equations whose solution determine the frequency of small vibrations of material systemsGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arsigny V, Fillard P, Pennec X, Ayache N (2006) Log-Euclidean Metrics for Fast and Simple Calculus on Diffusion Tensors. Magn Reson Med 56(2):411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Van Loan CF, Golub GH (1996) Matrix Computations, Third ed. Johns Hopkins Univ PressGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Foggia P, Sansone C, Vento M (2001) A Database of Graphs for Isomorphism and Subgraph Isomorphism Benchmarking. Proc Third IAPR TC-15 Int’l Workshop Graph-Based Represent Patt Recogn 176–187Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Riesen K, Bunke H (2008) IAM graph database repository for graph based pattern recognition and machine learning. SSPRGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Engineering & Information TechnologyCoimbatore Institute of TechnologyCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations