Advertisement

Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 394–406 | Cite as

Development of Fuzzy based Energy Efficient Cluster Routing Protocol to Increase the Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks

  • S. BalajiEmail author
  • E. Golden Julie
  • Y. Harold Robinson
Article

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Network is a wide area monitoring tools supporting for Scientific Research, Low-power microscopic sensors. WSN uses limited resource memory, computation power, bandwidth, and energy. The Cluster Routing protocol is the best methodologies for energy efficiency in the wireless sensor network. Cluster Routing Protocols are used to form a cluster creation on the selection of cluster head (CH). Then the data packets are sending from one CH to another CH and finally data packets are send to the base station. CHs are selected by using the setup phase. This system proposed a multi hop transmission, where the data packets are send from one hop to another hop. Finally these data packets are transmitted to the base station. To transmit the packets from source sensor to wireless sensor network base station via the cluster head, using the fuzzy logic type 1with three parameters such as trust factor and distance. The fuzzy logic predicts the nodes, which is having high trust factor, and near to the base station CH will be selected as best forwarder by using Type 1 fuzzy logic. It will direct to increase the life time of network plus reduce the overhead of network.

Keywords

Cluster routing protocols Fuzzy logic Weight 

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz IF, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y et al (2002) A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 40(8):102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Lindsey and C. S. Raghavendra, “PEGASIS: Power-efficient Gathering in Sensor Information Systems”, Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 9, no. 924, (2002) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu X (2012) A survey on clustering routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. Sensors 12(8):11113–11153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ali MS, Dey T, and Biswas R (2008) ALEACH: Advanced LEACH routing protocol for wireless microsensor networks. Int Conf Electr Comput Eng ICECE 909–914Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harold RY, Rajaram M, Golden JE, Balaji S (2016) Dominating set algorithm and trust evaluation scheme for secured cluster formation and data transferring. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Comput Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 10:388–393Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harold Robinson Y, Rajaram M, Golden Julie E, Balaji S (2016) “Tree based data fusion clustering routing algorithm for illimitable network administration in wireless sensor network”, world academy of science, engineering and technology. Int J Comput Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 10(6):1123–1130Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harold Robinson Y, Rajaram M (2016) A memory aided broadcast mechanism with fuzzy classification on a device-to-device mobile ad hoc network. Wirel Pers Commun:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3213-0
  8. 8.
    Arbab E, Aghazarian V, Hedayati A, Ghazanfari Motlagh N (2012) A LEACH-based clustering algorithm for optimizing energy consumption in wireless sensor networks” 2nd international Conference on computer science and information technology (ICCSIT'2012) SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manjeshwar DP, Agrawal E (2001) TEEN: A routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks, In Proceedings of the 15th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). San Francisco,CA, USA, pp 2009–2015Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karnik, N. N., & Mendel, J. M. (1998). An introduction to type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In proceeding of IEEE international Conference on fuzzy systems (FUZZ) (Vol. 2, pp. 915–920)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harold RY, Golden JE, Balaji S (2016) Bandwidth and delay aware routing protocol with scheduling algorithm for multi hop mobile ad hoc networks. World Acad Sci Eng Technol Int J Comput Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 10(8):1512–1521Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar SS, Kumar MN, Sheeba VS (2011) Fuzzy logic based energy efficient hierarchical clustering in wireless sensor networks. Int J Res Rev Wirel Sens Netw (IJRRWSN) 1(4):53–57Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liang QL, Mendel JM (2000) Equalization of nonlinear time-varying channels using type-2fuzzy adaptive filters. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 8(5):551–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulkarni RV, Forster A, Venayagamoorthy GK (2011) Computational intelligence in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 13(1):68–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balaji S, Rajaram M (2016) SIPTAN: securing inimitable and plundering track for ad hoc network. Springer, Wireless Personal Communications, pp 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3187-y Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baranidharan B, Srividhya S, Santhi B (2014) Energy efficient hierarchical unequal clustering in wireless sensor networks. Indian J Sci Technol 7(3):301–305Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heizelman W, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceeding of the 33rd annual Hawaii international Conference on system sciences (HICSS) (pp. 3005–3014). Maui, HIGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ye M, Li C, Chen G, Wu J (2005) EECS: an energy efficient cluster scheme in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of IEEE international workshop on strategies for energy efficiency in ad hoc and sensor networks. Phoenix, ArizonaGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Balaji S, Rajaram M (2014) “EUDIS-An Encryption Scheme for User-Data Security in Public Networks”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Int J Comput Inf Syst Control Eng 8(11):1825–1830Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shen B, Zhang SY, Zhong YP (2006) Wireless sensor network clustering routing protocol. J Softw 17(7):1588–1600CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shurman MM, Alomari ZA, and Mhaidat KM (2014) An Efficient Billing Scheme for Trusted Nodes Using Fuzzy Logic in Wireless Sensor Netw Wireless Eng Technol 5:62-73Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Castillo O, Melin P (2008) Type-2 fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh AK, Goutele S, Verma S, Purohit N (2012) An energy efficient approach for clustering in WSN using fuzzy logic. Int J Comput Appl 44(18):8–12Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    O. Younis and S. Fahmy, “HEED: A Hybrid, Energy-efficient”, Distributed Clustering Approach for Ad Hoc Sensor Networks. Mobile Compu, vol. 3, no. 366, (2004) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ArunSamPaul Thomas G, Karthik Ganesh R, Kandasamy A, Balaji S, Harold Robinson Y (2011) An advanced controlled-flooding routing with Group Organization for Delay Tolerant Networks using A-SMART. Emerging trends in electrical and computer technology (ICETECT), 978-1-4244-7926-9/11, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harold Robinson Y, Rajaram M, Golden Julie E, Balaji S (2016) “TBOR: tree based opportunistic routing for mobile ad hoc networks”, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Int J Comput Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 10(6):1115–1122Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Robinson YH, Balaji S, Rajaram M (2016) ECBK: enhanced cluster based key management scheme for achieving quality of service. Circuits Syst 7:2014–2024.  https://doi.org/10.4236/cs.2016.78175 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Balaji S, Harold Robinson Y, Rajaram M (2016) SCSBE: secured cluster and sleep based energy-efficient sensory data collection with mobile sinks. Circuits Syst 7:1992–2001.  https://doi.org/10.4236/cs.2016.78173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harold Robinson Y, Golden Julie E, Balaji S, Ayyasamy A (2016) Energy aware clustering scheme in wireless sensor network using neuro-fuzzy approach, wireless personal communications. Spring:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3793-8
  30. 30.
    Mendel JM (2001) Uncertain rule-based fuzzy logic system: introduction and new directions. Prentice Hall PTR, UpperSaddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Balaji S, Julie EG, Rajaram M, Robinson YH (2016) Fuzzy based particle swarm optimization routing technique for load balancing in wireless sensor networks, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Int J Comput Electr Autom Control Inf Eng 10(7):1384–1393Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Indranil G, Denis R, Srinivas SS (2005) Cluster-head election using fuzzy logic for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd annual communication networks and services research Conference (CNSR) (pp. 255–260)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jiang H, Sun Y, Sun R, Hindawi HX Fuzzy-Logic-Based Energy Optimized Routing for Wireless Sensor Networks. Pub Corp Int J Distrib Sens Netw 2013(216561):8.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/216561
  34. 34.
    Karnik NN, Mendel JM, Liang QL (1999) Type-2 fuzzy logic systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 7(6):643–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim JM, Park SH, Han YJ, Chung TM (2008) CHEF: cluster-head election mechanism using fuzzy logic in wireless sensor networks. In proceedings of the international Conference on advanced communication technology (ICACT) (pp. 654–659)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang K (2014) Wireless sensor networks." Principles, design and applications (2014).Zhang, Degan, et al. "An energy-balanced routing method based on forward-aware factor for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 10(1):766–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, H, Wang J (2014) An effective image representation method using kernel classification." Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI), 2014 I.E. 26th international Conference on. IEEE (pp. 853-858)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tuia D, Camps-Valls G, Matasci G, Kanevski M (2010) Learning relevant image features with multiple-kernel classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(10):3780–3791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang H, Wang J (2014) An effective image representation method using kernel classification. In tools with artificial intelligence (ICTAI), 2014 I.E. 26th international Conference on (pp. 853-858). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Qi C, Zhou Z, Sun Y, Song H, Hu L, Wang Q (2017) Feature selection and multiple kernel boosting framework based on pso with mutation mechanism for hyperspectral classification. Neurocomputing 220:181–190Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pardo A, Real E, Krishnaswamy V, López-Higuera JM, Pogue BW, Conde OM (2017) Directional kernel density estimation for classification of breast tissue spectra. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(1):64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao F, Guibas L (2004) Wireless sensor networks:an information processing approach. Publishers –San Francisco, Morgan KaufmannGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fan.C.-S. (2013) Rich: region-based intelligent cluster-head selection and node deployment strategy in concentric-based WSNs. Adv Electr Ana Maria Popescu Comput Eng 13(4):3–8.  https://doi.org/10.4316/AECE.2013.04001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chattwejee M, Das SK, Turgut D (2002) WCA: a weighted clustering algorithm for mobile ad hoc networks. Clust Comput 5:193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lee C, Jeong T FRCA: A Fuzzy Relevance-Based Cluster Head Selection Algorithm for Wireless Mobile Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks. Division of Electronic Engineering, Chonbuk National University, Jeonbuk, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aslam M, Rasheed MB, Shah T, Rahim A, Khan ZA, Qasim U, Qasim MW, Hassan A, Khan A, Javaid N Energy optimization and Performance Analysis of Cluster Based Routing Protocols Extended from LEACH for WSNsGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Klir G–J, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, New JerseyzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mahmoud MM, Lin X, Shen X et al (2015) Secure and reliable routing protocols for heterogeneous multihop wireless networks. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 26(4):1140–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ayyasamy A, Venkatachalapathy K (2012) Increased throughput for load based channel aware routing in MANETs with reusable paths. Int J Comput Appl 40(2):20–23Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ayyasamy A, Venkatachalapathy K (2015) Context aware adaptive fuzzy based QoS routing scheme for streaming services over MANETs. Wirel Netw 21(2):421–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Balaji
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Golden Julie
    • 2
  • Y. Harold Robinson
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringFrancis Xavier Engineering CollegeTirunelveliIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAnna University Regional CampusTirunelveliIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringSCAD College of Engineering and TechnologyTirunelveliIndia

Personalised recommendations