Advertisement

Lack of association between functional polymorphism of DNA repair genes (XRCC1, XPD) and clinical response in Indian chronic myeloid leukemia patients

  • Somprakash Dhangar
  • Vinay Shanbhag
  • Chandrakala Shanmukhaiah
  • Babu Rao VundintiEmail author
Original Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The resistance for the tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) occurs mainly due to BCR/ABL1 dependent and independent mechanisms. The defective DNA repair due to functional polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, might act as an etiological factor for leukemia progression. The study was carried out to understand the role of DNA repair genes (XRCC1, XPD) polymorphisms in Imatinib mesylate (IM) resistant CML patients. The study was carried out in total 87 CML patients (43 nonresponders-cases and 44 responders) who were treated with Imatinib. The treatment and follow-up was done according to European LeukemiaNet guidelines. The genotyping of selected SNPs were studied using RFLP and confirmed with Sanger sequencing (20%). The statistical analysis was performed using online tools (Socscistatistics and GraphPad InStat software). In our study no significant association was inferred between genotypes of DNA repair genes (XRCC1; rs1799782, rs25487, and XPD; rs13181) and complete cytogenetic response as well as molecular response. However there might be a possibility of association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln genotype AA/GA and cytogenetic response though it is statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Though none of the genotypes of the DNA repair genes showed association with IM response, near association between XRCC1Arg399Gln genotype and cytogenetic response observed in our study. Hence, large sample size should be studied to establish the association of SNPs of DNA repair genes and IM response. Our study is a novel and important to explain the role of DNA repair genes polymorphisms in IM resistance.

Keywords

DNA repair genes Double strand break (DSB) Clinical response Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) Imatinib mesylate 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was carried out from Institutional core grant from Indian Council of Medical Research, India. Thanks also due to study participants for their participation in follow up studies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Banescu C, Trifa AP, Demian S et al (2014) Polymorphism of XRCC1, XRCC3, and XPD genes and risk of chronic myeloid leukemia. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G et al (2013) European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood 122(6):872–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stein B, Smith BD (2010) Treatment options for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who are resistant to or unable to tolerate Imatinib. Clin Ther 32(5):804–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deligezer U, Akisik EE, Dalay N (2007) Lack of association of XRCC1 codon 399Gln polymorphism with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Anticancer Res 27:2453–2456Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marintchev A, Robertson A, Dimitriadis EK, Prasad R, Wilson SH, Mullen GP (2000) Domain specific interaction in the XRCC1-DNA polymerase beta complex. Nucleic Acids Res 28:2049–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Lanas A, Bujanda L et al (2017) Relevance of DNA repair gene polymorphisms to gastric cancer risk and phenotype. Oncotarget 8(22):35848–35862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feki-Tounsi M, Khlifi R, Louati I et al (2017) Polymorphisms in XRCC1, ERCC2, and ERCC3 DNA repair genes, CYP1A1 xenobiotic metabolism gene, and tobacco are associated with bladder cancer susceptibility in Tunisian population. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(28):22476–22484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozgoz A, Hekimler Ozturk K, Yukselturk A et al (2019) Genetic variations of DNA repair genes in breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 25(1):107–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang LJ, Wang HT, Wang XX (2016) Association of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer risk in a Chinese population. Genet Mol Res 15(2):1–7Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu J, Meng F, Kong LY et al (2008) Association between Imatinib-resistant BCR-ABL mutation negative leukemia and persistent activation of LYN kinase. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:926–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S et al (2003) Detection of BCR-ABL mutations in patients with treated with Imatinib is virtually always accompanied by clinical resistance, and mutations in the ATP phosphate binding loop (P-loop) are associated with a poor prognosis. Blood 102(1):276–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Quintas-Cardama A, Kantarjian HM, Cortes JE et al (2009) Mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance to Imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Control 16:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K et al (2001) Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR–ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science 293:876–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donato NJ, Wu JY, Stapley J et al (2004) Imatinib mesylate resistance through BCR-ABL independence in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Cancer Res 64:672–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Giles FJ, Kantarjian HM, Bekele BN et al (2002) Bone marrow cyclooxygenase-2 levels are elevated in chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia and are associated with reduced survival. Br J Haematol 119:38–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Le Coutre P, Tassi E, Varella-Garcia M et al (2000) Induction of resistance to Abelson inhibitor STI571 in human leukemic cells through gene amplification. Blood 95:1758–1766Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    El-din MS, Raslan H, Hamid SA et al (2012) Detection of XRCC1 gene polymorphisms in Egyptian patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Comp Clin Pathol 21:505–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penserga ET, Skorski T (2007) Fusion tyrosine kinases: a result and cause of genomic instability. Oncogene 26:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richardson C, Jasin M (2000) Frequent chromosomal translocations induced by DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 405:697–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pawlowska E, Blasiak J (2015) DNA repair-a double-edged sword in the genomic stability of cancer cells-the case of chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Mol Sci 16(11):27535–27549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salimizand H, Amini S, Abdi M, Ghaderi B, Azadi NA (2016) Concurrent effects of ABCB1 C3435T, ABCG2 C421A, and XRCC1 Arg194Trp genetic polymorphisms with risk of cancer, clinical output, and response to treatment with Imatinib mesylate in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Tumour Biol 37(1):791–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang F, Zhao Q, He HR, Zhai YJ, Lu J, Hu HB, Zhou JS, Yang YH, Li YJ (2015) The association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and risk of leukemia in different populations: a meta-analysis of case-control studies. Onco Targets Ther 8:3277–3287Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lunn RM, Helzlsouer KJ, Parshad R et al (2000) XPD polymorphisms: effects on DNA repair proficiency. Carcinogenesis 21(4):551–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guillem VM, Cervantes F, Martinez J et al (2010) XPC genetic polymorphisms correlate with the response to Imatinib treatment in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Am J Hematol 85(7):482–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ozcan A, Pehlivan M, Karaca E, Ozkınay C (2011) Polymorphisms of the DNA repair gene XPD (751) and XRCC1 (399) correlates with risk of hematological malignancies in Turkish population. Afr J Biotechnol 10:8860–8870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sorour A, Ayad MW, Kassem H (2013) DNA repair genes and their role for the development of acute myeloblastic leukemia. Genet Test Mol Biomarker 17(3):195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen S, Tang D, Xue K et al (2002) DNA repair gene XRCC1 and XPD polymorphisms and risk of lung cancer in a Chinese population. Carcinogenesis 23(8):1321–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rybicki BA, Conti DV, Moreira A et al (2004) DNA repair gene XRCC1 and XPD polymorphisms and risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13(1):23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CytogeneticsNational Institute of Immunohaematology (ICMR)MumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of HematologyKEM HospitalMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations