Preparation and characterization of resistant starch type III from enzymatically hydrolyzed maize flour
- 165 Downloads
Polysaccharides including resistant starch are categorized as dietary fiber and are used as an important prebiotic. Similar to soluble fibers, resistant starch also has a number of physiological effects that have been shown to be beneficial for health. Starch hydrolyzing enzymes, most importantly amylases, play essential roles in the production of resistant starch. This study aimed to develop α-amylase-treated maize flour with slow digestibility and unique physicochemical characteristics compared to native maize flour. In the current study, resistant starch type III from maize flour was prepared using α-amylase obtained from indigenously isolated Bacillus licheniformis. The α-amylase gene from B. licheniformis was amplified and cloned into the pET-24(a) vector, expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells and purified by metal ion affinity chromatography. The purified enzyme enhanced the yield of resistant starch 16-fold in maize flour. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the granular structure of maize flour was disrupted into a dense network with irregular structure, and X-ray diffractograms confirmed the transformation from an amorphous to a crystalline structure upon α-amylase treatment. Thermogravimetric analysis revealed increased amylose content of α-amylase-treated maize flour. Moreover, α-amylase-treated maize flour resulted in a significant enhancement of the desired properties of maize flour, such as resistant starch content, amylose, milk absorption capacity, and iodine and fatty acid complexing ability, and a reduction in swelling power, water binding, oil absorption capacity, and in vitro digestibility compared to untreated maize flour. Resistant starch type III showed low digestibility and increased complexing ability with iodine and fatty acid and therefore could be a safe and beneficial alternative as a coating material for the delivery of active, sensitive ingredients to the colon.
Keywordsα-Amylase Bacillus licheniformis Resistant starch Slow digestibility Resistant starch with unique characteristics
The authors thank the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan and TUBITAK, Turkey for providing financial assistance to carry out this work (Grant No. 9-5(Ph-1-MG-4)/Pak-Turk/R&D/HEC/2017.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
We declare no conflict of interest.
- 3.Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH (1992) Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr 46:33–50Google Scholar
- 4.Sutherland E (2018) What is resistant starch? Men’s Health 2018Google Scholar
- 6.Marlatt KL, White UA, Beyl RA, Peterson CM, Martin CK, Marco ML, Keenan MJ, Martin RJ, Aryana KJ, Ravussin E (2018) Role of resistant starch on diabetes risk factors in people with prediabetes: design, conduct, and baseline results of the STARCH trial. Contemp Clin Trials 65:99–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Peterson CM, Beyl RA, Marlatt KL, Martin CK, Aryana KJ, Marco ML, Martin RJ, Keenan MJ, Ravussin E (2018) Effect of 12 wk of resistant starch supplementation on cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with prediabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 108:492–501CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Illanes A (2008) Enzyme biocatalysis: principles and applications. SSBMGoogle Scholar
- 26.Abada EA (2018) Application of microbial enzymes in the dairy industry. In: Kuddus M (ed) Enzymes in food biotechnology, 1st edn. Academic Press, Singapore, pp 61–72Google Scholar
- 27.Kruger NJ (2002) The Bradford method for protein quantitation. In: Walker JM (ed) The protein protocols handbook, 3rd edn. Humana Press, Totowa, pp 17–24Google Scholar
- 36.Eliasson A-C (2017) Starch: physicochemical and functional aspects, carbohydrates in food, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 501–600Google Scholar
- 48.Kwak JH, Paik JK, Kim HI, Kim OY, Shin DY, Kim H-J, Lee JH, Lee JH (2012) Dietary treatment with rice containing resistant starch improves markers of endothelial function with reduction of postprandial blood glucose and oxidative stress in patients with prediabetes or newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis 224:457–464CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar