Associations between the presence of specific antibodies to the West Nile Virus infection and candidate genes in Romanian horses from the Danube delta
- 173 Downloads
The West Nile virus (WNV) is a mosquito-borne flavivirus causing meningoencephalitis in humans and animals. Due to their particular susceptibility to WNV infection, horses serve as a sentinel species. In a population of Romanian semi-feral horses living in the Danube delta region, we have analyzed the distribution of candidate polymorphic genetic markers between anti WNV-IgG seropositive and seronegative horses. Thirty-six SNPs located in 28 immunity-related genes and 26 microsatellites located in the MHC and LY49 complex genomic regions were genotyped in 57 seropositive and 32 seronegative horses. The most significant association (pcorr < 0.0002) was found for genotypes composed of markers of the SLC11A1 and TLR4 genes. Markers of five other candidate genes (ADAM17, CXCR3, IL12A, MAVS, TNFA), along with 5 MHC class I and LY49-linked microsatellites were also associated with the WNV antibody status in this model horse population. The OAS1 gene, previously associated with WNV-induced clinical disease, was not associated with the presence of anti-WNV antibodies.
KeywordsWest Nile virus Horse Restriction fragment length polymorphism Microsatellite SLC11A1 TLR4 MHC NKR Polymorphism
This research was supported by the Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC) CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02, and by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, project CEITEC 2020 [the Czech National Sustainability Programme NPU LQ1601, Grant No. LQ1601]. The work of ADM and GA was supported by the Grant UEFISCDI PCCDI 57/2018.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All blood samples were collected primarily for veterinary surveillance purposes, as part of the Romanian national strategic plan for diseases surveillance. All samplings were conducted by licensed veterinarians in compliance with all legal, ethical and professional standards and following the verbal consent of all owners.
- 8.Mashimo T, Lucas M, Simon-Chazottes D et al (2002) A nonsense mutation in the gene encoding 2’-5’-oligoadenylate synthetase/L1 isoform is associated with West Nile virus susceptibility in laboratory mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11311–11316. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.172195399 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Stejskalova K, Janova E, Horecky C, Horecka E, Vaclavek P, Hubalek Z, Relling K, Cvanova M, D’Amico G, Mihalca AD, Modry D, Knoll A, Horin P (2019) Genetic susceptibility to West Nile virus infection in Camargue horses. Res Vet Sci 124:284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2019.04.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gâştescu P (2012) The Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. Geography, biodiversity, protection, management. Water resources and wetlands conference proceedings 2012:431–442Google Scholar
- 18.Stejskalova K, Janova E, Horecky C et al (2019), Associations between West Nile Virus infection and candidate genes in Romanian horses from the Danube delta: not only OAS1 [dataset] Supplementary files, Mendeley Data, v3Google Scholar
- 23.Pagano M, Gauvreau K (2000) Principles of biostatistics, 2nd edn. Brooks/Cole, BelmontGoogle Scholar
- 24.Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT (2010) Statistical algorithms in Review Manager 5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252093205_Statistical_Algorithms_in_Review_Manager_5. Accessed 5 Dec 2018
- 28.Cotar AI, Falcuta E, Prioteasa LF, Dinu S, Ceianu CS, Paz S (2016) Transmission dynamics of the West Nile virus in mosquito vector populations under the influence of weather factors in the Danube Delta, Romania. EcoHealth 13:796–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-016-1176-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 37.Galdino H, Saar Gomes R, Dos Santos JC, Pessoni LL, Maldaner AE, Marques SM et al (2016) Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis amastigotes induces the expression of TNFα and IL-10 by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro in a TLR4-dependent manner. Cytokine 88:184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2016.09.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar