Advertisement

Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 3791–3800 | Cite as

Identification and sequencing of the gene encoding DNA methyltransferase 3 (DNMT3) from sea cucumber, Apostichopus japonicus

  • Hyun-Hee Hong
  • Sung-Gwon Lee
  • Jihoon Jo
  • Jooseong Oh
  • Seongmin Cheon
  • Hyun-Gwan Lee
  • Chungoo ParkEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

The sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus is well known as a traditional tonic food and as a commercially important cultured aquatic species. This species produces saponins, and has a high potential to cope with environmental stress, such as aestivation, organ regeneration, and wound healing. Recently, several studies have shown that cellular reprogramming and the physiological responses of the sea cucumber to environmental changes, including aestivation, are potentially mediated by epigenetic DNA methylation. The DNA methyltransferase (DNMT)1 and DNMT3 genes are independent participants in the maintenance and de novo methylation of specific sequences. Sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) and starfish (Asterina pectinifera), which belong to the same phylum as A. japonicus, have both DNMT1 and DNMT3 genes. However, it was previously reported that DNMT1 is present, but DNMT3 is absent, in A. japonicus. In the present study, we sequenced the full-length cDNA of the A. japonicus DNMT3 gene. The newly sequenced DNMT3 gene comprises three major conserved domains (Pro-Trp-Trp-Pro (PWWP), plant homeodomain (PHD), and S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase (AdoMet-MTase)), indicating that the DNMT3 possibly has de novo DNA methylation catalytic activity. Gene structure and phylogenetic analysis showed that sea cucumber DNMT3 is evolutionarily conserved in the Echinodermata. Next, we demonstrated the conservation of DNMT3 gene expression in sea cucumber and starfish belong to same phylum, echinoderm. Using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, sea cucumber DNMT3 mRNA was detected in testis tissue, but not in other tissues tested, including the respiratory tree, muscle, tentacle, intestine, and ovary. This is inconsistent with previous reports, which showed the expression of DNMT3 in ovary, but not in testis of the starfish A. pectinifera, indicating the tissue- and species-specific expression of DNMT3 gene. Although further studies are needed to clarify the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms of DNMT3 and its application to the aquaculture industry, our findings may provide insights into the sea cucumber biology.

Keywords

Sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus DNA methylation DNMT3 RACE-PCR Phylogenetic analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Collaborative Genome Program (No. 20180430), and “Development of methods for controlling and managing marine ecological disturbance-causing and harmful organisms” (MEDHO), and “Research center for fishery resource management based on the information and communication technology (ICT)” of the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries of the Republic of Korea to C.P.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human subject or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

11033_2019_4821_MOESM1_ESM.tiff (17.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (TIFF 17582 kb)
11033_2019_4821_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (4 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (TIFF 4096 kb)
11033_2019_4821_MOESM3_ESM.tiff (3 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (TIFF 3072 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Jaenisch R (1995) Developmental genetics—role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Scientist 9:15Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tycko B (1997) DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Rev Mutat Res 386:131–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5742(96)00049-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beard C, Li E, Jaenisch R (1995) Loss of methylation activates Xist in somatic but not in embryonic-cells. Genes Dev 9:2325–2334.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.9.19.2325 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharp AJ, Stathaki E, Migliavacca E, Brahmachary M, Montgomery SB, Dupre Y, Antonarakis SE (2011) DNA methylation profiles of human active and inactive X chromosomes. Genome Res 21:1592–1600.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.112680.110 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borgel J et al (2010) Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nat Genet 42:1093.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.708 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franco R, Schoneveld O, Georgakilas AG, Panayiotidis MI (2008) Oxidative stress, DNA methylation and carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 266:6–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curradi M, Izzo A, Badaracco G, Landsberger N (2002) Molecular mechanisms of gene silencing mediated by DNA methylation. Mol Cell Biol 22:3157–3173.  https://doi.org/10.1128/Mcb.22.9.3157-3173.2002 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanchez-Romero MA, Cota I, Casadesus J (2015) DNA methylation in bacteria: from the methyl group to the methylome. Curr Opin Microbiol 25:9–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2015.03.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lyko F (2018) The DNA methyltransferase family: a versatile toolkit for epigenetic regulation. Nat Rev Genet 19:81–92.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2017.80 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bird AP, Wolffe AP (1999) Methylation-induced repression—belts, braces, and chromatin. Cell 99:451–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81532-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith ZD, Meissner A (2013) DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 14:204–220.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3354 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sasaki H, Matsui Y (2008) Epigenetic events in mammalian germ-cell development: reprogramming and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 9:129–140.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2295 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rebollo R, Romanish MT, Mager DL (2012) Transposable elements: an abundant and natural source of regulatory sequences for host genes. Annu Rev Genet 46:21–42.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155621 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schultz MD et al (2015) Human body epigenome maps reveal noncanonical DNA methylation variation. Nature 523:212.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14465 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Law JA, Jacobsen SE (2010) Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat Rev Genet 11:204–220.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2719 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lister R et al (2013) Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 341:629.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237905 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xie W et al (2012) Base-resolution analyses of sequence and parent-of-origin dependent DNA methylation in the mouse genome. Cell 148:816–831.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.035 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Colot V, Rossignol JL (1999) Eukaryotic DNA methylation as an evolutionary device. BioEssays 21:402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Suzuki MM, Bird A (2008) DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 9:465–476.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2341 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Drewell RA et al (2014) The dynamic DNA methylation cycle from egg to sperm in the honey bee Apis mellifera Development 141:2702–2711.  https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.110163 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riviere G, Wu GC, Fellous A, Goux D, Sourdaine P, Favrel P (2013) DNA methylation is crucial for the early development in the Oyster C gigas. Mar Biotechnol 15:739–753.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-013-9523-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tweedie S, Charlton J, Clark V, Bird A (1997) Methylation of genomes and genes at the invertebrate-vertebrate boundary. Mol Cell Biol 17:1469–1475.  https://doi.org/10.1128/Mcb.17.3.1469 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keller TE, Han P, Yi SV (2016) Evolutionary transition of promoter and gene body DNA methylation across invertebrate-vertebrate boundary. Mol Biol Evol 33:1019–1028.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv345 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen TP, Li E (2004) Structure and function of eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases. Curr Top Dev Biol 60:55–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lei H, Oh SP, Okano M, Juttermann R, Goss KA, Jaenisch R, Li E (1996) De novo DNA cytosine methyltransferase activities in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development 122:3195–3205PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R (1992) Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell 69:915–926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schermelleh L et al (2007) Dynamics of Dnmt1 interaction with the replication machinery and its role in postreplicative maintenance of DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res 35:4301–4312.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm432 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gao F et al (2012) Differential DNA methylation in discrete developmental stages of the parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis. Genome Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r100 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adema CM et al (2017) Whole genome analysis of a schistosomiasis-transmitting freshwater snail. Nat Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15451 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Geyer KK et al (2017) The Biomphalaria glabrata DNA methylation machinery displays spatial tissue expression, is differentially active in distinct snail populations and is modulated by interactions with Schistosoma mansoni. PloS Neglect Trop D.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang XT et al (2014) Genome-wide and single-base resolution DNA methylomes of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas provide insight into the evolution of invertebrate CpG methylation. Bmc Genomics 15:4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-1119 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Choe S, Ohshima Y (1961) On the morphological and ecological differences between two commercial forms, green and red of the japanese common sea cucumber, Stichopus japonicus Selenka Nippon. Suisan Gakkaishi 27:97–106.  https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.27.97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kan-No M, Kijima A (2002) Quantitative and qualitative evaluation on the color variation of the japanese sea cucumber Stichopus japonicus aquaculture. Science 50:63–69.  https://doi.org/10.11233/aquaculturesci1953.50.63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bahrami Y, Zhang W, Franco C (2014) Discovery of novel saponins from the viscera of the sea cucumber Holothuria lessoni. Mar Drugs 12:2633–2667.  https://doi.org/10.3390/md12052633 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim SK, Himaya SWA (2012) Chapter 20 - Triterpene glycosides from sea cucumbers and their biological activities. In: Advances in food and nutrition research, vol 65. Academic Press, pp 297–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416003-3.00020-2
  36. 36.
    Thimmappa R, Geisler K, Louveau T, O’Maille P, Osbourn A (2014) Triterpene biosynthesis in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:225–257.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120229 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carnevali M, Burighel P (2010) Regeneration in echinoderms and ascidians. In: eLS.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0022102
  38. 38.
    Rychel AL, Swalla BJ (2009) Regeneration in hemichordates and echinoderms. Stem cells in marine organisms. Springer, Netherlands, pp 245–265.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2767-2_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    De Carvalho DD, You JS, Jones PA (2010) DNA methylation and cellular reprogramming. Trends Cell Biol 20:609–617.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Yakushiji N et al (2007) Correlation between Shh expression and DNA methylation status of the limb-specific Shh enhancer region during limb regeneration in amphibians. Dev Biol 312:171–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.09.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhao Y, Chen MY, Storey KB, Sun LN, Yang HS (2015) DNA methylation levels analysis in four tissues of sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus based on fluorescence-labeled methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism (F-MSAP) during aestivation. Compar Biochem Physiol B 181:26–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2014.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhao Y, Chen MY, Su L, Wang TM, Liu SL, Yang HS (2013) Molecular cloning and expression-profile analysis of sea cucumber DNA (Cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 and methyl-CpG binding domain type 2/3 genes during aestivation. Compar Biochem Physiol B 165:26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2013.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cameron RA, Samanta M, Yuan A, He D, Davidson E (2009) SpBase: the sea urchin genome database and web site. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D750–D754.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn887 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fujihara Y, Miyasako H, Kato K, Hayashi T, Toraya T (2012) Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of starfish DNA (Cytosine-5)-methyltransferases. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 76:1661–1671.  https://doi.org/10.1271/bbb.120161 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Reich A, Dunn C, Akasaka K, Wessel G (2015) Phylogenomic analyses of Echinodermata support the sister groups of Asterozoa and Echinozoa. PLoS ONE 10:e0119627.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119627 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Finn RD et al (2016) The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D279–D285.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sievers F et al (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7:5.  https://doi.org/10.1038/msb.2011.75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 60. Mol Biology and Evolution 30:2725–2729.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Milne I, Wright F, Rowe G, Marshall DF, Husmeier D, McGuire G (2004) TOPALi: software for automatic identification of recombinant sequences within DNA multiple alignments. Bioinformatics 20:1806–1807.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth155 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Yang A-F et al (2010) Stability comparison of cytb and β-actin gene expression in sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 1:020Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wu H, Zhang Y (2014) Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell 156:45–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.019 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ponger L, Li WH (2005) Evolutionary diversification of DNA methyltransferases in eukaryotic genomes. Mol Biol Evol 22:1119–1128.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi098 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jo J et al (2016) Comparative transcriptome analysis of three color variants of the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus. Mar Genom 28:21–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2016.03.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E (1999) DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99:247–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81656-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Du HX et al (2012) Transcriptome sequencing and characterization for the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka, 1867). PLoS ONE 7:4.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jo J et al (2017) Draft genome of the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus and genetic polymorphism among color variants. Gigascience 6:5.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giw006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang XJ et al (2017) The sea cucumber genome provides insights into morphological evolution and visceral regeneration. PLoS Biol.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003790 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Golding MC, Westhusin ME (2003) Analysis of DNA (cytosine 5) methyltransferase mRNA sequence and expression in bovine preimplantation embryos, fetal and adult tissues. Gene Expr Patterns 3:551–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hirasawa R, Chiba H, Kaneda M, Tajima S, Li E, Jaenisch R, Sasaki H (2008) Maternal and zygotic Dnmt1 are necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of DNA methylation imprints during preimplantation development. Genes Dev 22:1607–1616.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1667008 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Huntriss J et al (2004) Expression of mRNAs for DNA methyltransferases and methyl-CpG-binding proteins in the human female germ line, preimplantation embryos, and embryonic stem cells. Mol Reprod Dev 67:323–336.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    La Salle S, Mertineit C, Taketo T, Moens PB, Bestor TH, Trasler JM (2004) Windows for sex-specific methylation marked by DNA methyltransferase expression profiles in mouse germ cells. Dev Biol 268:403–415.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.12.031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    La Salle S, Trasler JM (2006) Dynamic expression of DNMT3a and DNMT3b isoforms during male germ cell development in the mouse. Dev Biol 296:71–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.04.436 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Marques CJ, Pinho MJ, Carvalho F, Bieche I, Barros A, Sousa M (2011) DNA methylation imprinting marks and DNA methyltransferase expression in human spermatogenic cell stages. Epigenetics 6:1354–1361.  https://doi.org/10.4161/epi.6.11.17993 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Li Y et al (2019) Dynamics of DNA methylation and DNMT expression during gametogenesis and early development of scallop Patinopecten yessoensis. Mar Biotechnol 5:4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-018-09871-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences and TechnologyChonnam National UniversityGwangjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Oceanography, Marine Ecological Disturbing and Harmful Organisms Research CenterChonnam National UniversityGwangjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations